Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
7 years ago
Part 1-Rodgers’ Play:

11:43 4th Q, 1st and 10 down by 14: Carolina brings 5. Mike calls the PERFECT play. GB has Cobb and Nelson right, who run deep; Rodgers [also lined-up right] runs a 10 yard curl to the right; and Jones, lined up right, ran out to the right. Carolina only has 4 guys on right side of field. 2 DBs and a deep safety tracked Cobb/Nelson deep. Leaving one, Keuchly, to guard Jones and Rodgers, who are 20 yards apart. Indeed this was Read 1A and 1B for Rodgers and Keuchly was frozen half way between; so wherever Rodgers releases the ball it’ll be good for 15 or more. Instead Rodgers decides to satiate his dotard base, most of whom consider themselves knowledgeable to expert, with a big play and gets SACKED. And here’s the thing with 1 LB on 2 receivers and 5 rushing: the blitz limits the time to make the big play and the big play has to occur with 5 guarding the other 3 receivers. This is the cost for willfully skipping wide open receivers early in the progression, it means the others are most likely covered.

Rodgers REPEATEDLY passed up open shorter routes for the big play, a few he made, the dotards were happy; I wasn’t. Playing outside the offense increases the # of times the ball returns Carolina w/o a score. Plus, NO WAY he survives 6 games taken so many extra, senseless, unnecessary, stupid hits.

And those back to back 4th Q sacks on 3rd/5 and 4th/14 were disgraceful. He purposefully submarined his team’s chances because the little egocentric stat whore didn’t want 2 INCs or another INT on his permanent record.

Part 2-The corporate model:

Large American corporations work to one end: SOCIOPATHIC PROFIT. These profits turn on the way consumers consume their product. Football corporate profit typically increases with winning, so most try; but make no mistake, winning is not an ultimate goal in any way. If losing with a Rodgers makes more profit than winning without him; Rodgers will start no matter how may loses. If a coach interferes with the profit plan, no matter how good his football decisions; he will be fired [See McAdoo].

Similarly, blog and corporate profits hinge on the way consumers consume their product, hence, their product is adjusted to satiate the appetite of their consumers.

Part 3-Fans Affect Play

#12 single-handedly destroyed GB’s odds to beat Carolina because he could not control the kiddy, playground, selfish, messiah-complexed, sociopathic part of his nature. Though this “quality” resides in most successful professional athletes; if it appears, they beat it back because they know if they play like a total douche ass clown a KNOWLEDGEABLE fan base will turn. The fans by their consumption will cause truthful media, endorsements to dry up and the team will allow football people to make roster decisions based solely on football and not PR or profit.

Cubs fan Steve Bartman attended a game and statistically put his team at a disadvantage: Cubs needed 27 outs to win; Bartman got the Marlins 28. In his defense, this back-stab was not planned.

Likewise, it was the dotard Packer fan that served as Carolina’s 12th and 13th man, much like Bartman was there for the Marlins. Except they acted willingly and with malice and forethought continually refusing to blame Rodgers for his crap play; they REFUSE to hold him accountable for his beyond stupid, selfish and stat whore play. Blog and beat writers write their satiating slop to gratify their consumers; truthful articles about Rodgers are tempered or discarded. And 1265 is doomed to another year of Aaron Doppelganger Rodgers.

How many more superbowls are we going to sacrifice lose because dotard fans enjoy providing a warm place in their mouths for Rodgers’ pagoda?

STOP IT!
STOP being sycophant little mindless twits that give our opponents better odds of winning and most important: have some god damn pride!
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
"Carolina Loss in on he GB Fan"

Huh?
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
On the plays where Rodgers REPEATEDLY passed up open shorter routes. Tell me exactly the play called was, what the progressions of the play were, what the defense was showing.

Otherwise give it up because you don't know.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Cheesey
7 years ago
Has Barfarn EVER had something positive to add in threads???
Why change NOW???
Oh....wait...."positive" hate, "positive" whining.....LOL!😝 😂
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
7 years ago
How much do you want to bet Barfarn never used the word "dotard" before Kim Jong-un leveled that epithet against Donald Trump?

Friendly hint, Comrade Barfarn: You might think it makes you sound sophisticated, educated, or clever to bandy about old-fashioned-sounding insults like "dotard," but the word doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. Flogging perfectly good English words so egregiously just makes you sound pretentious, hyperbolic, and worst of all, shrill.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
7 years ago

Flogging perfectly good English words so egregiously just makes you sound pretentious, hyperbolic, and worst of all, shrill.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Pretty accurate description regardless of the words used.
7 years ago

"Carolina Loss in on he GB Fan"

Huh?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



he has no idea either
Nonstopdrivel
7 years ago
It looks to me like it's supposed to be "Carolina loss is on the GB fan." Looks like he might have been Swyping on a mobile device when he wrote it.

But seriously, the loss is the fault of the fans? Really, Barfarn? Really?
UserPostedImage
beast
7 years ago

It looks to me like it's supposed to be "Carolina loss is on the GB fan." Looks like he might have been Swyping on a mobile device when he wrote it.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



That's what I was thinking as well.

Also there seems to be a catchphrase that's been repeating

have some god damn pride!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 

Have some god damn pride!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 

And I believe he said it, in a now deleted post as well.


Feels weird, just randomly going around questioning others people pride.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
7 years ago
Nonstop..,..you KNOW he now has to get a dictionary to look up all dem words you dun used in yur post!😁
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (20m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (21m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (21m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (29m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (29m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (50m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.