Matchup [2017] Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Green Bay Packers· Page 2

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

7 years ago

The Green Bay offense came into this game ranked 25th in the league? Where would they rank had Rodgers not played the first few weeks? 💤 😕 😢

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#12

The Green Bay offense came into this game ranked 25th in the league? Where would they rank had Rodgers not played the first few weeks? 💤 😕 😢

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Our D is ranked 24th to go along with our lowly ranked O. Both units firmly in the bottom 1/3 of the league.

We narrowly defeated a bad Tampa team at home.

Can't see a reason to be fired up as long as Hundley is at QB or we have our defense. 12 only changes one variable, so I remain as I am until that 2nd variable changes.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#13

so I remain as I am until that 2nd variable changes.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You remain as you are no matter what... even if all variables are changed... you'll still be own grumpy ol fart yelling at the homer kids to stop running on your blades of grass, and complaining about how things can't be like the good old days, even though we're old enough to know the good old days we're really as good as it's being glorified out to be.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#14

199yds rushing, many 3 and outs are the 2 variables , plus bad Brett day and it all adds up.

Of course the only stat that matters is the finsl score.
There are no style points in The NFL!

The goal is to get to 7-6 after next week!

Nothing else matters!

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#15

beast... change is the only way to happiness as far as my fandom is concerned. Nobody, unless they like losing, should be happy here. Why you keep hammering me for wanting to watch a winner is the real mystery.

Winners are the team hoisting the Lombardi on that podium last game in February. If you trust this regime because they got lucky once in 12 years that's on you. Says nothing about me. Winning makes me happy. You can be happy with 2nd best on down. Good for you.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

isocleas2
Member

7 years ago

#16

beast... change is the only way to happiness as far as my fandom is concerned. Nobody, unless they like losing, should be happy here. Why you keep hammering me for wanting to watch a winner is the real mystery.

Winners are the team hoisting the Lombardi on that podium last game in February. If you trust this regime because they got lucky once in 12 years that's on you. Says nothing about me. Winning makes me happy. You can be happy with 2nd best on down. Good for you.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

The Packers have won more games than just about anyone over the last couple decades, they have as many superbowl appearances (and wins) than all but a couple teams. They've done just fine at winning, some fans are just unreasonable with their expectations.

Btw I liked it better when you avoided the forums during the season and I avoided the forums in the off-season. Your constant debbie downerism is depressing, the Packers just won and here you are acting like someone just pissed in your cheerios. I also suspect even if you got the changes you want you still wouldn't be a happy. You're a dog chasing a car even if you caught it you wouldn't know what to do with yourself.

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#17

Our D is ranked 24th to go along with our lowly ranked O. Both units firmly in the bottom 1/3 of the league.

We narrowly defeated a bad Tampa team at home.

Can't see a reason to be fired up as long as Hundley is at QB or we have our defense. 12 only changes one variable, so I remain as I am until that 2nd variable changes.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

And with the great Aaron Rodgers as QB GB narrowly beat an extremely mediocre Cincinnati team.

packerfanoutwest
Member

7 years ago

#18

And with the great Aaron Rodgers as QB GB narrowly beat an extremely mediocre Cincinnati team.

Originally Posted by: wpr

I remember that game. Play calling that game was very poor. Rodgers even said, "stupid fucking call"
But when you have a "highly successful coach",................

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

dfosterf (5h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (5h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (5h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (12h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (13h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (14h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (14h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (14h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (16h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24