Impressive win on the road without 33 and 88 for most of it.

Why the gushing for Jamaal Williams? 20-67 is not much of a day in the NFL.

Needed 2-3 wins. There's one. It takes playing a poor QB to get it but thankfully there's Flacco, Fitzpatrick and whomever Cleveland trots out. All beatable QBs. A chance.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

Most of Williams yards came after contact. They were not easy, but he seemed to have key runs on key downs.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 

Not bad at all for the 3rd string RB. I wonder how many snaps he took in practice with the 1st string this week?

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Thanks Ted Thompson!

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

An objective comment to 20-67 is that it's not gush worthy.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

This is the opposite of objective!

To assert 20-67 objectively quantifies William's performance is to assert that all 20-67 games by a RB are the same.

Of course, it requires remedial football acumen to know that a run game can be affected by an O-line's performance and/or whether the D is playing downhill expecting the run and/or playing with 6,7,8 or 9 men in the box; etc.

And because this analysis is closer to bat crap crazy then objective, you are wrong. William's performance today was not only "gush worthy," it was stellar.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn