wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
7 years ago


Perhaps Aaron Rodgers was on to something when he campaigned for Jared Cook to remain a Packer.
We all know what happened next. Cook and general manager Ted Thompson couldn’t agree on a number and Cook ended up in Oakland.
But Thompson didn’t leave the cupboard bare. He went out and signed Martellus Bennett, who was coming off his second-best season of his career. He caught 75 percent of his targets from Tom Brady for 701 yards and seven touchdowns en route to his first Super Bowl ring.
But there’s one problem: through four games, Bennett looks nothing his 2016 self. He has lacked explosion, has appeared sluggish and has displayed butterfingers with four drops.
Bennett was brought to Green Bay because he’s a veteran that knows how to win and he is an excellent blocker. The blocking reason is interesting to me. How important is a blocking tight end on a pass-heavy team?
Through four games, Bennett is ranked 17th among all tight ends by averaging 35 yards a game. I really thought that Bennett would mimic Jermichal Finley’s dynamic ability and put the offense on another level. I was wrong. Bennett doesn’t look like Finley, he actually looks like Richard Rodgers.
Which begs the question, who exactly is Bennett? The 10-year pro has notched only four seasons with 55-plus receptions. Finley had three such seasons in just a six-year career.
The Packers need Bennett. Especially now with Davante Adams potentially missing time after a suffering a jarring reckless hit at the hands of Danny Trevathan. Bennett needs to eat up defenders and the middle of the field so that the edges are free for Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, Adams and Geronimo Allison. (I would mention Jeff Janis, but I don’t expect him to see an offensive snap this year, barring a rash of injuries.)
I’ve always said that tight ends are the ultimate equalizer in this league. If you have an athletic, dynamic tight end, you have a distinct advantage and will see a mismatch on each and every play.
However, Bennett has turned into an albatross thus far. He is holding this offense back. And to prove it, Bennett really wanted to build a rapport with Rodgers in the summer. However, those two still aren’t on the same page because Bennett still doesn’t have a red zone target.
Do the Packers need Bennett to win another NFC North title? No. But they will need him to secure home field advantage in the NFC playoffs and punch the Packers’ tickets to the first Super Bowl since 2010.
With the amount of injuries this team has gone through, the Packers could use a dominating performance. Not just to reinforce that they weren’t wrong about the former Patriot, but to take some pressure off an offense that had to start a guard at tackle on Thursday because the starters and second-stringers are all hurt.
Filed Under:[URL=/blog/category/1265-lombardi-ave/ted-thompson" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]Ted Thompson[/URL][URL=/blog/category/corys-corner" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]Cory's Corner[/URL][URL=/blog/category/featured" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]Featured[/URL][URL=/blog/category/packer-offense/tight-ends" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]Tight ends[/URL]NFL Categories:[URL=/taxonomy/term/12336" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]Green Bay Packers[/URL]Tags:[URL=/tag/martellus-bennett" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]Martellus Bennett[/URL][URL=/tag/green-bay-packers" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]green bay packers[/URL][URL=/tag/aaron-rodgers" typeof="skos:Concept" property="rdfs:label skos:prefLabel" datatype="]Aaron Rodgers[/URL]
Like



Like Like

0 points



[/URL]


Continue Reading @ [url=http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CheeseheadTv/~3/4neb22X1IwE/corys-corner-marty-bennett-is-just-mediocre-519]CheeseheadTV 

CheeseheadTV wrote:



Oops. I got the wrong post.
Bennett's fine. We don't need All World at TE. He is doing a half way decent job. There is a reason he has played for 5 teams. Good but not great can keep you on the move in this league.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
7 years ago
Some of the drops have been bad but it looks to me like we have no real plan of how to use Bennett. If we had Gronkowski running 2 yard routes to the sideline he wouldn't be very effective for us either. Bennett is a huge receiver and we basically do nothing with him vertically and a lot of the passes Rodgers has thrown to him are low which makes it tougher for a really tall guy to catch. Put the ball up there and let the guy use his size and wingspan.

We use him in the passing game basically the same way we'd use a 5'9" slot WR.
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
Martellus Bennett is being kept in to help block because of the OL injuries. We'll see a better Bennett once we get out Tackles back.
UserPostedImage
shield4life
7 years ago
I'll add to what Zero & Steve stated as well, that it takes time to build chemistry with your new QB as well.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
DoddPower
7 years ago

Martellus Bennett is being kept in to help block because of the OL injuries. We'll see a better Bennett once we get out Tackles back.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I agree. The Packers haven't been able to use him as they likely intended yet. That should change if the offensive line gets healthy, though. And regardless, he is a beast blocker. A plodding receiver though, but a great blocking TE is valuable, especially with these offensive line injuries.
Barfarn
7 years ago
I'm loathe to criticize the genius that is MM's ability to structure an offense.

Did a blurb on Rich Rodgers' stellar production a year ago when running the seam or middle as opposed to 5 yard curls and as Steve says those 2 yard to the sideline plays that aren't even outs, they are just so flaccid.

The 1-line curls can be a weapon; Bennett cannot be covered and he can fall for 2 more yards. But these "out" routes, which leave TEs vulnerable like a seedling being cut down by a 64" chainsaw and I think to injury as well, leave me perplexed.

There is no way Marty is having trouble with the playbook, per se; but he might be having a little trouble getting on same page as Rodgers with the post snap adjustments. Haven't noticed this because they are running many routes that bring this into play.

This is not a indictment because even Jordy has had a few. EG There was a 3rd and long deep in GB territory and Jordy did a deep slant and Rodgers expected a deep drag. Rodgers expecting a sliding Jordy to be there, threw to 1 yard past marker and Jordy was 4-5 yards beyond that spot. Romo said that was one Rodgers was better off not throwing, but it was a great pass if Rodgers and Jordy were on same age.

As Dodd says, His blocking is valuable. Plus, its lighting a fire under Rich Rodgers booty. in previous years Rodgers has been kinda dainty when he blocks; this year he's more animal/martysaurous.
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
I do wonder if Rodgers preference for the ball being as hard as possible plays into drops. We have seen Just about every Wr and TE go through drops at some time with him. When you have a hard ball thrown hard an in positions that are a little low or behind it makes the catch harder to make.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Bigbyfan
7 years ago
We won't see Bennett's true impact on our offense until the Packers get both their starting OTs in the lineup.
blank
beast
7 years ago
In the first 3 weeks of 2016, Jared Cook had 6 catches for 53 yards.
In the first 3 weeks of 2017, Martellus Bennett has 11 catches for 102 yards

In the first 4 weeks of 2017, Martellus Bennett has 17 catches for 141 yards
In the first 10 weeks of 2016, Jared Cook had 6 catches for 53 yards

I think it is fair to say Bennett is doing better than Cook did to start as a Packer. We will just have to wait and see how it finishes.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago

In the first 3 weeks of 2016, Jared Cook had 6 catches for 53 yards.
In the first 3 weeks of 2017, Martellus Bennett has 11 catches for 102 yards

In the first 4 weeks of 2017, Martellus Bennett has 17 catches for 141 yards
In the first 10 weeks of 2016, Jared Cook had 6 catches for 53 yards

I think it is fair to say Bennett is doing better than Cook did to start as a Packer. We will just have to wait and see how it finishes.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I think the stats for 2016 might be off. The 10 regular season  games (he missed six) for Jared Cook he had 30 receptions and 377 yards with 1 TD.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (11h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (12h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
22-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.