We got the officiating gifts this weekend, Remember that in the future when...

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

The block in the back of Rodgers was a weak call at best, Unless something happened off camera, I don't see a punch thrown for the ejection of Lane, if anything Adams should have been flagged. And the Non-call PI. There clearly was contact, yet I can see why the call wasn't made also.

So in the future, when the calls don't go our way, think back and remember yesterday, when we came out on the winning side.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Mr_Bumpy
Member

7 years ago

Now maybe we can finally let "fail mary" go?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

7 years ago

I was surprised Jimmy Graham was allowed to grab a players helmet and hold. I thought that was a foul. I'm glad they just let them play. Hopefully it stays that way consistently.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

I don't think it was a "punch", but the guy did shove his arm into Adam's neck. That could be what they flagged.
The push into Rodgers back wasn't that much, but it WAS in his back which is a foul.
About time we get some ref "payback".

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member Topic Starter

7 years ago

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

I'm wondering if the "punch" happened before and Adams turning and grabbing the facemask was a reaction rather than the beginning. Otherwise why would Adams have stopped, he wasn't blocking he was chasing the play.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

steveishere
Veteran Member

7 years ago

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

The cameras i've seen all cut away before Lane gets off of Adams too so we never saw that part of it but Adams in the interview didn't seem to think he got punched.

Poppa San
Member

7 years ago

Some of these are from memory and I was not 100% concentrating on the game as I was not in the best viewing location but here goes:
so the first play of the game wasn't intentional grounding because???
Cobb was flagged for taunting? What words did he use?
The PI non-call. How far past the endline did the moon-rocket pass land?
Davante Adams got tackled for a PI noncall.
How many forearms around his thorax does CM3 need to suffer before he wins a holding call?
The Packers DBs were reffed the same way as the Legion of Boom has been called for years. Finally!

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

I awoke this morning with a headache. I still went to work. She went back to sleep.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

Cobb WAS taunting the guy after the catch. You could see that clearly on the TV.
I was actually saying "Stop it Cobb! You'll get flagged!"
I get it that these 2 teams have no love for each other. But doing something DUMB like that that stops a very promising drive is stupid. Add the 15 yards that was lost, and they may have at least got a FG out of it.
Fortunately in the end it didn't cost us.

Porforis
Veteran Member

7 years ago

The block in the back of Rodgers was a weak call at best

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Granted, I only saw the replay once but it seemed extremely straightforward to me - Rodgers was chasing after the defender, another defender is running up from behind and shoves him in the back enough to alter his course. Didn't make a difference in the play in the end but still. Can someone explain this to me?

Unless something happened off camera, I don't see a punch thrown for the ejection of Lane, if anything Adams should have been flagged. And the Non-call PI. There clearly was contact, yet I can see why the call wasn't made also.

So in the future, when the calls don't go our way, think back and remember yesterday, when we came out on the winning side.

I mean, he drove his forearm into Adams' face then down to his neck. DEFINITELY shouldn't have been an ejection but I'm not surprised it was a flag.

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#10

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

There was no punch... but there might of been an elbow wedged to the throat at the end.

Adams did go down as if he was punched though, and CB Lane's right arm was extended, that's the best I can come up with, for saying a punch was thrown. And then it looked like Lane's left arm sorta coiled-up like it was gonna do something, but at best that's an open hand slap to the back as Lane gets on top of Adams.

[Edited, I believe the ref Dave Parry (who I read called the ejection, is on the sideline to the right (not shown) of these camera angles]

I believe between these two videos you see the whole thing.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (4h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (10h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (21h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (21h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS