The Texans aren't good...period.Neither are the Lions.Washington was in the playoffs last year and so were we.Neither team was very good.
You just lambasted me for glossing over peoples wonderful points.Tell me who Detroit beat this year?They were a bottom feeder.The Texans are an embarrassment.How they're in the playoffs is curious to me.
If I ask you point blank...Do you think the Texans and Detroit are good teams your response will likely be tangential:THEY'RE BOTH IN THE PLAYOFFS!!!!That isn't an answer to the question.
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa
The part not quoted here is just a downer and I can't imagine why anyone would spend so much time trying to ruin others joy in their teams success, anyhow.
You said the Packers beat NOBODY. I pointed out that THREE of the SIX teams (stop me if you freaking heard this before) were in the playoffs. Thus, they are NOT half dozen NOBODY's as you proclaim.
Good is a relative term that can change from one persons perception to another persons.
For the sake of this right here right now, I'm going define "good" as in a team that I feel could compete for the Super Bowl.
Eagles, no.
Texans, no. Good defense, but absolutely nothing at QB worth bragging about.
Seahawks, yes.
Bears, no. Defense vastly improved over last portion of season, but no. QB play killed them. Awesome RB though.
Vikings, no. Very good defense, but their OL was their Achilles even though their QB set an NFL record for completion percentage.
Lions, if Slay is 100%, I would say yes, but without one of the top 5-7 CB's in the NFL (yes, he is that underrated) I just don't think Cinderella has enough pixy dust to last through midnight. No.
Under that definition, the only team I can say is good would be Seahawks.
The thing with saying what team is good and what team is not doesn't make sense. The NFL is about situations and matchups.
In the playoffs there are 12 teams and I would only say 8 of them are good and legitimate contenders for the Super Bowl - in my mind anyhow.