luigis
8 years ago
Ok this one is on me.
We all know Mike reads this forum every week and digests all the posts.
Remember the day we made a joke about Peppers playing TE and then he dropped a TD pass next week?

I (and others) called Mike a conservative coach last week, he took it seriously, he wasn't going to kneel, no way.Granted,it was kind of absurd but he did what he had to do.

Now if you want to criticize Mike consider what you write....
Luis
nerdmann
8 years ago

I doubt nerd was serious when he made that suggestion but I do think Mike McCarthy is conscious of those things at times. Certainly he is not going to call a pass to Adams in that case but I do believe that if a player is close to a significant mark Mike McCarthy will try to do what he can to get him there within reason. He won't put a player in jeopardy or risk a game or really try to rub it in but I do think he would make an effort to try to accommodate such things if he could and it wouldn't change his philosophy too much. The problem with passing yards is if the guy ain't open he ain't open and even if the call is to him and he's covered there is only so much the coach can do. One thing he wouldn't do is tell Aaron to throw it to Adams no matter what to get him his yards but I could very easily see him calling a few plays that would be intended for Adams if he knew the situation. That's all anyone could ask or expect.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



Put it this way, if Davante hadn't dropped about 20 passes this season, they might have tried a little harder to get him there. 😎
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

I was kinda wondering about that call as well but I wouldn't call Mike McCarthy stupid for making it. First of all, as Zero said, we have no idea why he did call it. Get a first down and Detroit never touches the ball again, I'd be willing to bet that is what he was thinking and he would be right. No chance for another 4th quarter comeback. They wouldn't have even needed a first down as three running plays would likely take an additional 10 seconds off the clock over three kneel downs.

I get what you are saying Barfan but IMO the only reason it was questionable is because of what did happen. 9 series out of 10 and probably more that's three runs into the line and go home.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



I'm sure I would have commented on it regardless of the result. When I didn't see the Victory formation; I jumped up and startled those I was watching game with😂. We were all celebrating and it stopped; because we all knew we were a fumble away from having OT possible. Detroit could have got the ball with 1:25 left and a TO.

When I saw the ball go to Kerridge, I yelled KERRIDGE!?! Then when we saw Spriggs we just couldn't believe it. During the injury time out, every orifice of McCarthy's anatomy was discussed as being penetrated by everything from a "dull ice pick" to "Long Dong Schlong's cryogenically frozen cock" [I cant stop laughing about this one]. Relief hit the room when out of the TO, they lined up in V. Did you see the knee to Rodgers' head on the onside recovery? Onside kicks are concussion makers.

McCarthy had no plan; he just wasn't thinking. There is no excuse for this. Proof of this is by what he did next: 2X kneel down.

Now if he's going to kneel 2x to leave 26 seconds on the clock; why would he not kneel 3x to leave 7-8 seconds or less? If the goal is not to punt, cause there's some risk there; then why not run 2 more times to try for the first and not give ball back. With Detroit selling out on the run and our OL not anywhere near being a road grader, there is only a .0001% chance of getting the 1st running up the middle.
sschind
8 years ago

Put it this way, if Davante hadn't dropped about 20 passes this season, they might have tried a little harder to get him there. 😎

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Don't know if it was 20 but if he had caught a couple more they wouldn't have needed to try.

Nonstopdrivel
8 years ago
Davante Adams reminds me of James Jones with his penchant for dropping the ball that hits him on the fingertips, then later making up for it with a wildly improbable catch no one should have been able to make. Maybe it's a flaw in Rodgers' passing style, but I have to think it boils down to a problem with focus.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Don't know if it was 20 but if he had caught a couple more they wouldn't have needed to try.

Originally Posted by: sschind 


You are right, it was not 20, it was 5.

5 drops Davante Adams
2 drops Jordy Nelson and Jared Cook

Odell Beckham had 6,
Mike Evans had 7,
Michael Crabtree had 9,
Leveon Bell had 5,
TY Hilton had 6,
Julian Edelman had 5.


Source: Stats INC 
UserPostedImage
Porforis
8 years ago

Davante Adams reminds me of James Jones with his penchant for dropping the ball that hits him on the fingertips, then later making up for it with a wildly improbable catch no one should have been able to make. Maybe it's a flaw in Rodgers' passing style, but I have to think it boils down to a problem with focus.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I'd be perfectly cool with Adams turning into James Jones 2.0. I think he's got the talent to be more of a Greg Jennings but we'll see.

Although I do kind of get Adams vibes from Allison. Love seeing the young guys grow up!
PackFanWithTwins
8 years ago
My first guess is that giving the kid 1 carry kicked in some provision of his contract.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Porforis
8 years ago

My first guess is that giving the kid 1 carry kicked in some provision of his contract.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



That he gets no money if he gains negative yards? How shrewd, Ted! 😁
uffda udfa
8 years ago

Again, READING COMPREHENSION!

Maybe most coaches may have run X3 in Seattle [Read Herring!] But, the premise of the argument is that Mike is a genius and he knows better; HE DID NOT CALL THOSE SEATTLE RUNS!!! Please, listen or otherwise educate yourself: Mike trusts Aaron and there is a check to pass on every run play GB has!

If the issue is Kerridge's confidence, why put him in a situation that has 99.999% chance of failure?
And if he had a nice gain, so what, the game was over with 3x kneel.

The odds of a fumble were at least multiplied by 100; the odds of injury by thousands. And now we lost our #6 OLman and may have pupped a starter for 2017. Injuries occur; but to increase their odds is 100% unconscionable.

Uffda may not come back: after 6 2015 games he predicted GB going undefeated; at 4-6 didn't see us wining one; oh and one of my favorites Adams is too slow to be an effective WR. Guys like him make these crazy factless void of football acumen ramblings. If a few come true, they taught their unavailing genius; if not, they disappear in shame. And pop up again as...I dont know "Thorn-in-the-arse."

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Oh, so wrong. I thought a perfect season hinged on game at Denver. I said this before the season.

I did say 8-8 for this year was a dream. Aaron awoke from his coma and I'm bummed it'll take 10 years for a book to come out explaining why/how.

As to the topic, I agree. It is fun watching some not understanding nuance and trying to equate apples to oranges. MM is DiMM. I've always maintained I wanted more intelligence from the HC position.

Running horse and Kerridge was senseless. Watching it spun into we don't know what thinking went into that decision IS the point here. Idiotic doesn't begin to cover it.

I'm glad Coughlin is gone. Perhaps, MM has just enough to outlast his porn stached protege on Sunday.

Oh. It's after the season. It's why they call it the post-season. Can't wait to read about what a great season it was at the point we're eliminated. We were favored to win every game before the season. 10-6 is a dismal failure but we did beat 5 bad teams and one horrible road team so I understand the enthusiasm. Nothing changes.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (3h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.