Porforis
8 years ago
The hilarious thing is that people can sit here and scream about Aaron Rodgers being a bum by playing like a middle-of-the-road quarterback for a year and a half, and a complete loose cannon like I don't know, Ryan Leaf. Spoiled rotten.
nerdmann
8 years ago

We were closer than I thought 😂 😂 😂 😂.

And you are 100% correct; why dont i blame Bostick? It's expectations. Rodgers is on a completely different mental level than any other QB in history. The little things he does are truly awe inspiring. One didn't get much press; a few weeks ago he read if a QB slides head first and no one touches he can get up and run. The darn refs kept blowing the whistle on him 😂. Though its for the better, if he pulls that off, 11 guys will be waiting and hoping he tries it again, they wont touch him just so he can get up or they will head hunt him on the ground.

To see him intentionally give into bad play [not staying in pocket, going through his reads, etc] and bad team building behavior, makes me nuts. Gotta admit, after 1.5 years, i gave up. Just assumed he'd be a good boy for a week or 2 and fall back, be a good boy for a week, and fall back, just like Jay.

He came back for Minny and I can feel it; he's gonna show up in Detroit too. Now after we get a lead, he needs to put it out of this mind and stay in the pocket an execute the game plan.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



It's playoff time. He needs to start "really trying."
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

The hilarious thing is that people can sit here and scream about Aaron Rodgers being a bum by playing like a middle-of-the-road quarterback for a year and a half, and a complete loose cannon like I don't know, Ryan Leaf. Spoiled rotten.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



Please don't put us people in the same generalized label as those whack jobs. Thank you. 😍
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
8 years ago

If you honestly think Aaron's play over the last 5 -7 games is the same as it was earlier in the season then you are crazy. In your opinion it was the receivers and you are entitled to that opinion but the opinion of many others was that Rodgers was not performing up to the level that most of us knew he could. Yes there were a few, a very few, who were saying bench him for Hundley but the vast majority of people who were criticizing him were also saying he is our best chance to win and he just has to fix what was wrong with him. IMO he has done that. I don't know what happened but there is no doubt that his game has improved. Yes 40 TDs and 4000-4500 yards is a great year but I think even you would have to admit that he had some pretty bad games where he missed a lot of open guys or seemingly ignored them all together. Then again, maybe not.

Originally Posted by: sschind 



It is hard to imagine that Aaron's throws that were high and outside were all the receiver's fault. It happened so many times.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
8 years ago

It is hard to imagine that Aaron's throws that were high and outside were all the receiver's fault. It happened so many times.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Also hard to imagine it's the receivers fault when he wasn't stepping into his throws or going through his progressions.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DoddPower
8 years ago

The hilarious thing is that people can sit here and scream about Aaron Rodgers being a bum by playing like a middle-of-the-road quarterback for a year and a half, and a complete loose cannon like I don't know, Ryan Leaf. Spoiled rotten.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



Yeah, Packers fans are the worst.
Cheesey
7 years ago
As it ALWAYS is, the QB gets most of the "attaboys" or "he stinks!" depending on if we win or lose.

That said, Rodgers has been playing like...well.....AARON RODGERS the last 5 games. And that is what we needed to have a chance at the playoffs.
He COULD have just mailed it in, and given up. But he didn't, and we have a shot at being "one of six" as Mike McCarthy said in 2010.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
Matt Ryan has been just as good over the last five games as Aaron Rodgers.

Rodgers
ATT: 161
COMP: 115 (71.4%)
YDS: 1,367
TD: 11
INT: 0
RATING: 119.8
SACK: 10

Ryan
ATT: 152
COMP: 110 (72.3%)
YDS: 1,366
TD: 10
INT: 2
RATING: 116.3
SACK: 12
UserPostedImage
nyrpack
  • nyrpack
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

Matt Ryan has been just as good over the last five games as Aaron Rodgers.

Rodgers
ATT: 161
COMP: 115 (71.4%)
YDS: 1,367
TD: 11
INT: 0
RATING: 119.8
SACK: 10

Ryan
ATT: 152
COMP: 110 (72.3%)
YDS: 1,366
TD: 10
INT: 2
RATING: 116.3
SACK: 12

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



in those 5 games only 1 team is in the playoffs and thats the chiefs which was a loss, aaron during this stretch is 2-0 and you can throw in minny as a viable team just eliminated !!


jimmy b.
packerfan21
7 years ago

Matt Ryan has been just as good over the last five games as Aaron Rodgers.

Rodgers
ATT: 161
COMP: 115 (71.4%)
YDS: 1,367
TD: 11
INT: 0
RATING: 119.8
SACK: 10

Ryan
ATT: 152
COMP: 110 (72.3%)
YDS: 1,366
TD: 10
INT: 2
RATING: 116.3
SACK: 12

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



But Matt Ryan has a legit rushing game (ranked 7th or 8th in the league) and arguably the best WR in the game right now. If you swap Ryan and Rodgers around I'd be willing to bet that Ryan would would not be as successful (stat and wins wise) where as Rodgers would probably have the same if not better stats and possibly a better record. Due to that, I believe Rodgers is more valuable to his team. Seriously if the MVP award is not about who is more valuable but who has the better stats or more wins overall then the award should just be called something else. The only reason why I would see Rodgers not winning it this year is due to the early to mid games where he played very average or below average but seriously, the teams success highly falls on his play and that to me is what should determine how valuable you are in the NFL.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (9h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (17h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (22h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.