mi_keys
8 years ago

You use CBS and Yahoo! and I'll raise you NFL.com  and FoxSports.com  and MMQB.com  which have Packers 8th and Buccaneers 7th!!

BUT -- FoxSports  and MMQB  also have them flipped on their NFL Standings so they are just as freaking confused as me! lol

Your move!! lol


I'm leaning towards the common games thing is an error and it's supposed to slide to the next tie-breaker.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



You'd think something as simple as standings would be presented consistently across all major sports media. I suppose not.

Assuming CBS and the strength of victory tiebreaker crew are correct, and Green Bay is currently edging Tampa, it's important to note that the strength of tiebreaker could swing back in Tampa's favor depending on results across the league over the next two weeks (i.e. teams Tampa Bay beat outperform teams Green Bay beat).
Born and bred a cheesehead
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

You'd think something as simple as standings would be presented consistently across all major sports media. I suppose not.

Assuming CBS and the strength of victory tiebreaker crew are correct, and Green Bay is currently edging Tampa, it's important to note that the strength of tiebreaker could swing back in Tampa's favor depending on results across the league over the next two weeks (i.e. teams Tampa Bay beat outperform teams Green Bay beat).

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



It is a little mind boggling. The rules are printed in black and white and how some can show accuracy and some be wrong is just baffling.

I'm fairly confident the common games thing is probably using the data from the prior week since this week has yet to conclude and therefore it is off. I bet this time tomorrow Packers are ahead of Buccaneers in all standings.
UserPostedImage
Barfarn
8 years ago

It is a little mind boggling. The rules are printed in black and white and how some can show accuracy and some be wrong is just baffling.

I'm fairly confident the common games thing is probably using the data from the prior week since this week has yet to conclude and therefore it is off. I bet this time tomorrow Packers are ahead of Buccaneers in all standings.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Mi Keys' common game analysis is spot on. These guys are calculating this stuff for everyone, we focus only on GB. Our analysis will generally be more reliable. Just be glad Wash has a tie; this gets real spoke in a 3 way tie break.

ON SOV and SOS I don't use W/L%, I just count the # of wins [and this year ya gotta watch for ties, but they cancel in every situation between GB and TB]. It gives a better feel for just how close the tie break is.

Right now:
We are 1 win ahead of TB in Strength of victory, if Carolina wins tonight, which we're hoping for to get ahead of Wash...then we will be tied with TB for SOV.

Then, we're onto strength of schedule. Presently GB has a solid lead of 6 wins that will be reduced to 5 if Carolina wins and increases to 7 if Wash wins. We'll also pick up 16 wins for Minn and Det in coming 2 weeks to 11 for TB for playing NO and CAR [12 if Car wins tonight]. So assuming Car wins, we'll have an almost insurmountable lead of 9 wins on SOS.

Many games cancel each other [EG KC plays SD in week 17/NY plays Philly in week 16; making it so TB cant pick up any ground/we cant lose any ground] and considering our SOS teams already have a 9 game lead and are presumably better; if we end up tied in SOV, we will win the SOS tie break unless something real freaky occurs.
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Mi Keys' common game analysis is spot on. These guys are calculating this stuff for everyone, we focus only on GB. Our analysis will generally be more reliable. Just be glad Wash has a tie; this gets real spoke in a 3 way tie break.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



He said what I had said, didn't he? lol.

I am calculating for everyone, not just the Packers. My goodness, you think statistical analysis is something I just started doing this morning on the crapper? (ps, you'd be right!)

I am not glad Redskins have a TIE, I would rather them have a LOSS instead.
UserPostedImage
beast
8 years ago

The Packers can actually reach the 2nd seed.

With a lot of pixy dust.


Buccaneers must lose 2 of last 3 (Cowboys, Saints and Panthers)
Falcons must lose against Panthers AND Saints
Seahawks must lose to Cardinals AND 49ers
Packers must beat Vikings AND Lions

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It's very hard to picture the Seahawks losing to these 49ers, who settled in and looking towards next year, not fighting out each game like the Bears seem to be doing. Then again, the Seahawks STILL haven't won against an NFC team on the road (yet).

Seahawks road games
Preseason
W - Chiefs (not NFC)
W - Raiders (not NFC)
Real Season
L - Rams
W - Jets (not NFC)
T - Cardinals
L - Saints
W - Patriots (not NFC)
L - Buccaneers
L - Packers
? - 49ers

So I guess... if the 49ers try hard... there is a chance?

I believe we are in a win and you're in scenario now. I haven't found a path with both wins and missing playoffs.

The Packers can actually lose against Lions and still make playoffs. They just need Redskins to lose 2 of last 3 and Buccaneers to lose all three.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yep, if the Packers win both games then they're the Division Champions, and division champs get a home playoff game.

I haven't look in the "what-ifs" of them losing lately, but I find it interesting you mentioned losing to the Lions and can still get in... is that also true for the Vikings? .... a week ago, I just used that link that was posted in the thread you give me a hard time by not explaining something in chat... and it seemed to suggest that the Vikings game was more important than the Lions game for some reason... like the Packers had a higher chance of earning a wildcard spot by beating the Vikings and losing to the Lions than they did of losing to the Vikings and losing to the Lions. I just found it interesting that according to that site, the Vikings game was more important to the Packers because of some tie breaking rule(s).

But bottom line, if the Packers win their last two games, then they're in. Of course... the Vikings would love to spoil that for the Packers and they're next.... and while the Vikings have seriously struggled, their problems have been with stopping the pass rush.... while injuries have been doing a great job recently of stopping the pass rush for the other teams. Packers need to make sure they can get pressure against the Vikings backfield before the ball gets out of the backfield.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

I haven't look in the "what-ifs" of them losing lately, but I find it interesting you mentioned losing to the Lions and can still get in... is that also true for the Vikings?

Originally Posted by: beast 



Packers can lose to Vikings and beat Lions and they'd still get the division. Does that answer your question? If not, I'm afraid I'm not following what ya asking.

If Packers win vs Vikings and lose to Lions, they need help to get in. But, if they lose to Vikings and beat Lions, nothing else really matters because Packers win tie-breaker over Lions for division.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago
The tie-breaker rules are as follows for Wild-Card team.
[list=1]
  • Head-to-head, if applicable.
  • Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
  • Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
  • Strength of victory.
  • Strength of schedule.
  • Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  • Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
  • Best net points in conference games.
  • Best net points in all games.
  • Best net touchdowns in all games.
  • Coin toss.[/list]

  • 1: Buccaneers and Packers did not play each other.
    2: Both are 6 - 4
    3: Both are 3 - 2
    4: Both have .442
    5: Packers .510 and Buccaneers .505


    And that is why Packers are 6th seed and Buccaneers are 7th seed in the current conference standings.

    And if you doubt that, here is the official stuff from NFL's Game Statistic and Information System.

    UserPostedImage
    steveishere
    8 years ago

    Packers can lose to Vikings and beat Lions and they'd still get the division. Does that answer your question? If not, I'm afraid I'm not following what ya asking.

    If Packers win vs Vikings and lose to Lions, they need help to get in. But, if they lose to Vikings and beat Lions, nothing else really matters because Packers win tie-breaker over Lions for division.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    That's only if Detroit loses to Dallas. If they beat Dallas and we lose to Minnesota they still have 1 more win than us even if we beat them for a 2nd time.
    nerdmann
    8 years ago

    The tie-breaker rules are as follows for Wild-Card team.
    [list=1]

  • Head-to-head, if applicable.
  • Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
  • Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
  • Strength of victory.
  • Strength of schedule.
  • Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
  • Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
  • Best net points in conference games.
  • Best net points in all games.
  • Best net touchdowns in all games.
  • Coin toss.[/list]

  • 1: Buccaneers and Packers did not play each other.
    2: Both are 6 - 4
    3: Both are 3 - 2
    4: Both have .442
    5: Packers .510 and Buccaneers .505


    And that is why Packers are 6th seed and Buccaneers are 7th seed in the current conference standings.

    And if you doubt that, here is the official stuff from NFL's Game Statistic and Information System.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    Whoa, we're IN as of right now!? That blows my mind man! It's a wild card, but we're on the inside looking out. Let's keep this going!

    “Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
    Zero2Cool
    8 years ago

    That's only if Detroit loses to Dallas. If they beat Dallas and we lose to Minnesota they still have 1 more win than us even if we beat them for a 2nd time.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    This is accurate.
    UserPostedImage
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (30m) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
    dfosterf (2h) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
    Zero2Cool (2h) : what is Schefter saying?
    dfosterf (2h) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
    dfosterf (2h) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
    Mucky Tundra (9h) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
    Mucky Tundra (9h) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
    Mucky Tundra (9h) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
    Mucky Tundra (9h) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
    dfosterf (14h) : *Orzech*
    dfosterf (14h) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
    Zero2Cool (15h) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
    wpr (16h) : YES!!!!!!
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
    Zero2Cool (16h) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
    Zero2Cool (16h) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
    wpr (17h) : He played pretty good.
    Zero2Cool (17h) : NAZIR STACKHOUSE HAS MADE THE 53
    Zero2Cool (18h) : NOOOOO KALEN IS GONE
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Kalen King and Kamal Hadden making it. me thinks
    schroeder84 (19h) : @dfosterf I suspect Elgersma WILL be hard to hide. Raw, but talented
    Zero2Cool (21h) : pp.com is broken, halt testing, gotta go do work things for a bit
    hardrocker950 (21h) : Mecole Hardman was released, to the surprise of few
    Zero2Cool (21h) : PP.com updated. Reset Password works, and now User Profile pages are a thing
    Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : Soft hope plan is having fantasy football weekly on-site that i build. cannot do that with this setup.
    Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It's older technology, resource hog, cannot be upgraded/changed. That's to start.
    packerfanoutwest (25-Aug) : Ok, but what is wrong with this site?
    Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : check out packerpeople.com
    Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Oh crap I missed that! I thought it was a 2026 pick
    Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : It wasn't even next year pick, it's two years away. old dog food value
    Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Yep! Everytime a team trades with Howie that team is the loser (so says the media)
    Zero2Cool (25-Aug) : We are hosed.
    Mucky Tundra (25-Aug) : Per Schefter, GB is sending a 6th rounder for OT Darian Kennard
    Zero2Cool (24-Aug) : Finally got new site to keep folks logged in. New tech is pain sometimes
    dfosterf (23-Aug) : Taylor Elgersma is going to be very hard to hide.
    Mucky Tundra (23-Aug) : Matthew Golden=DAWG (so load the wagons!!) !!!!!
    dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
    Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
    Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
    Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
    Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
    Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
    Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
    Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
    Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
    Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
    dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    53m / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    18h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

    23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.