Porforis
8 years ago

If the Packers kicked and made that FG, the Bears would have been forced to go for it on 4th down and would have probably been up by 1 and that last drive would have had a lot more pressure on the team. When it was tied 27 up, you are more relaxed because in your mind you're thinking at worst it's a tie. When you're down by one, you know you gotta amp some shit up lol

Not excusing Mike McCarthy going for it earlier, just tossing that out there. Also, I was good with going for it, I just very much didn't like the play call, or at least what looked like what was called. I think on 4th and 3 you run quick slants and lead the WR to the ball and zingalingding 1st down!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Didn't consider that, good point. Doesn't change my original statement about not liking it at the time and I still say you go for it, but I get that you're not trying to argue with that point, just showing that it actually may have played out in our benefit in the end.

I like going for it on 4th and manageable aggressively a LOT more when Rodgers is healthy. If it's not 4th and 1 or less, I always like throwing the ball, Rodgers always has the option to scramble for the 1st down if he doesn't have someone open.
8 years ago

Amazing that basically every DC in the league that actually gets paid goes into a soft defense, when all the experts watching from home know better.

So what do you want Mike to do? If he just runs the ball to eat clock and burn timeouts, you complain that he is choking, when he is running pretty much normal plays and the clock doesn't get chewed up, you complain that he is choking. It couldn't possibly be that for two series in the 4th, the offense didn't execute enough, not could it.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



Just think what would/could have happened if Mike McCarthy went for the FG to make it 10-0? Instead, numbnuts goes for it on 4th and 3, not 4th and 2. Numbnuts calls timeout and what happens? Rodgers gets sacked. Bears ball, momentum changes, they go down and make it 7-3. Pack go 3 and out, Bears then go down and take the lead 10-7. 3rd quarter...Pack come out and intercept Barkley, and proceed to a 27-10 lead, Bears fans start leaving the game.
Now fast forward to the 3rd quarter, Pack up 27-10......Capers goes into his soft zone, Bears start scoring and Mike McCarthy doesn't know what to do, so on 1st and 10, he starts going for the bomb. Pack go 3 and out again and again. Mike McCarthy doesn't know what to do, except going back to his predictable play calling and play not to lose..........
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Just think what would/could have happened if Mike McCarthy went for the FG to make it 10-0? Instead, numbnuts goes for it on 4th and 3, not 4th and 2. Numbnuts calls timeout and what happens? Rodgers gets sacked. Bears ball, momentum changes, they go down and make it 7-3. Pack go 3 and out, Bears then go down and take the lead 10-7. 3rd quarter...Pack come out and intercept Barkley, and proceed to a 27-10 lead, Bears fans start leaving the game.
Now fast forward to the 3rd quarter, Pack up 27-10......Capers goes into his soft zone, Bears start scoring and Mike McCarthy doesn't know what to do, so on 1st and 10, he starts going for the bomb. Pack go 3 and out again and again. Mike McCarthy doesn't know what to do, except going back to his predictable play calling and play not to lose..........

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest 



I just don't understand why Mike McCarthy keeps calling these sacks. Why doesn't he call a play that scores every time? Seems like a waste to me.

😎
UserPostedImage
8 years ago

I just don't understand why Mike McCarthy keeps calling these sacks. Why doesn't he call a play that scores every time? Seems like a waste to me.

😎

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



you tell me, Rodgers got sacked 3 times after timeouts
DarkaneRules
8 years ago
Mike would be the last person I blamed if we lost. Davante knows. He tweeted about. Damarius knows. He was taken out of the game. But we won. YAY. Two more to go.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Cheesey
8 years ago
Let's see.......Davante Adams had TWO drops that would have been touchdowns. Jordy Nelson would have had a HUGE gain on one throw, but the refs missed the defender grabbing his arm and pulling it down before the ball got there.
You know, the Bears players get paid to play too! Plus, you KNOW they wanted to knock the Packers out of playoff hopes.
The fact that Aaron Rodgers was pretty much a sitting duck in the pocket didn't help. There were MANY times where he normally would have taken off for big gains. He toughed it out, and with no time outs he got down the field to FG position, and, WE WON!

And who here would have thought that Monty would have run for 162 yards and TWO TD's? I sure didn't!
And there were a few times where I was yelling at the TV, "Why are you running the ball???" as Monty SEEMED to be stopped at the line of scrimmage, when he burst through for big gains.
Shows you how much I know!🤣
UserPostedImage
Porforis
8 years ago


And there were a few times where I was yelling at the TV, "Why are you running the ball???" as Monty SEEMED to be stopped at the line of scrimmage, when he burst through for big gains.
Shows you how much I know!🤣

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Guilty here too.

Those stupid runs to the outside need to die though. They get >2 yards maybe one out of 10 times and losses 7/10 times.
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Numbnuts calls timeout and what happens? Rodgers gets sacked.

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest 


you tell me, Rodgers got sacked 3 times after timeouts

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest 


You're right, he was sacked three times after a timeout. Two of the three timeouts were taken by Chicago.

Sack #1 not after timeout
Sack #2 after Chicago timeout
Sack #3 after Green Bay timeout
Sack #4 after Chicago timeout

Seems like that Chicago Numbnuts did a good job calling timeouts. Twice after a timeout the Bears sacked Rodgers. Damn that Mike McCarthy!!!
UserPostedImage
Porforis
8 years ago

You're right, he was sacked three times after a timeout. Two of the three timeouts were taken by Chicago.

Sack #1 not after timeout
Sack #2 after Chicago timeout
Sack #3 after Green Bay timeout
Sack #4 after Chicago timeout

Seems like that Chicago Numbnuts did a good job calling timeouts. Twice after a timeout the Bears sacked Rodgers. Damn that Mike McCarthy!!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



McCarthy called a timeout but Rodgers loves freelancing and sticking it to his coach so much that he put McCarthy in handcuffs so he couldn't call a timeout after Chicago called a timeout so that he could blame McCarthy for the sacks because he's a self-centered diva that likes being sacked to stick it to his coach.
nerdmann
8 years ago

Let's see.......Davante Adams had TWO drops that would have been touchdowns. Jordy Nelson would have had a HUGE gain on one throw, but the refs missed the defender grabbing his arm and pulling it down before the ball got there.
You know, the Bears players get paid to play too! Plus, you KNOW they wanted to knock the Packers out of playoff hopes.
The fact that Aaron Rodgers was pretty much a sitting duck in the pocket didn't help. There were MANY times where he normally would have taken off for big gains. He toughed it out, and with no time outs he got down the field to FG position, and, WE WON!

And who here would have thought that Monty would have run for 162 yards and TWO TD's? I sure didn't!
And there were a few times where I was yelling at the TV, "Why are you running the ball???" as Monty SEEMED to be stopped at the line of scrimmage, when he burst through for big gains.
Shows you how much I know!🤣

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Most QBs are sitting ducks when they hold the ball for 8+.

And yeah, he could throw ot away wihout a grounding call if there is a player within 15 yards. QBs hrow it out of bounds all the time.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (9h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (14h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (23h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.