The only WR we would think about taking at #9 would be Crabtree if he is there.. but even then, I think we would take away the pick and move down.
"DakotaT" wrote:
I know most people don't agree with me on this but I like Jeremy Maclin more than Michael Crabtree.
Yes Crabtree is the better player right now but I don't see much potential or room for growth in him because he's gotten a lot it out already and he doesn't have that deep speed. I see him as a good #1 but not great for reason.
Maclin is a lot more raw but he has huge potential. I mean he's a more talented Steve Smith type talent in a 6-1, 200 pound body with room to add more muscle.
I just see a lot more upside in Maclin even though Crabtree is better right now but the draft is about the future not about right now.
"beast" wrote:
Beast, I think the Packers have proven that 1st round receivers are not a necessity, and in our system, a number 1 wideout isn't even wanted (my opinion).
I've always felt a top ten pick should be used on a dominent defensive lineman, left tackle, quarterback, or cover corner. Of course there are exceptions like a Sean Taylor at safety. Neither of the receivers you mention are top ten material.
Florio strives and thrives on controversy, and he caught RP's attention.
"pack93z" wrote: