wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
Since we are all experts and know what is going on in the Packer's Front Office I thought we could say what the next few transactions will be.

1. Goode will be signed and Davis will go on IR.
2. Janis goes to IR and Allison is signed from the PS.
In 4 weeks:
3. Goodson will be reinstated and take Dorleant's place.
4. Pennel will be reinstated and take Ringo's place.
5. In 5 weeks they bring Lindsey back from the PUP and let him practice. (That's earlier than needed to by the PUP.) After 7 weeks he is added to the roster and Hawkins is released. He moves to the PS and takes the place of Allsion's replacement.
6. Around week 9 or 10 either Janis or Davis will be recalled but they wait until an injury to a WR to be named later.
UserPostedImage
luigis
8 years ago
1. Yes I think this is happening. Although going to Jacksonville with Barcaly or Perillo as our LS would be a fun experiment.
2. I don't think so, I think we just wait for Janis to recover.
3. I think Goodson is gone forever and I think that is a good thing.
4. Pennel will be back but I think the roster spot will be freed from a DB (Dorleant), we only have a few DLs and too many DBs.
5. Hawkins stays Linsley will come back at the expense of Murphy.
Luis
nerdmann
8 years ago

1. Yes I think this is happening. Although going to Jacksonville with Barcaly or Perillo as our LS would be a fun experiment.
2. I don't think so, I think we just wait for Janis to recover.
3. I think Goodson is gone forever and I think that is a good thing.
4. Pennel will be back but I think the roster spot will be freed from a DB (Dorleant), we only have a few DLs and too many DBs.
5. Hawkins stays Linsley will come back at the expense of Murphy.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



I agree they keep Janis for ST, if they IR someone else it will probably be Davis.

They'll keep Goodson for the 4 weeks, in case someone breaks their leg or something. If we don't need him, he can go play in Minnesota.

I also think we'll keep Hawkins. Dude could be the next Tramon. As for Linsley, I suspect he may never play again. Hope he can come back, but at this point, I'm not optimistic.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

1. Yes I think this is happening. Although going to Jacksonville with Barcaly or Perillo as our LS would be a fun experiment.
2. I don't think so, I think we just wait for Janis to recover.
3. I think Goodson is gone forever and I think that is a good thing.
4. Pennel will be back but I think the roster spot will be freed from a DB (Dorleant), we only have a few DLs and too many DBs.
5. Hawkins stays Linsley will come back at the expense of Murphy.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



I am not married to these moves. Other than the first one all are a reach. I was looking for discussion so I suggested few that are not so likely to happen. Such as if Goodson comes back I will be a little surprised. And I realize they are thin on the DL.

As far as Barclay and Perillo as LS, I wouldn't have minded it with some of the old Jags teams but they are a little better this year. I have stated for years that I hate giving a spot on the roster to someone who is solely a LS. I just don't believe that a backup C or OG can't become a decent LS if he put in the practice time effort.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
8 years ago
Wayne, if a player gets IRed, they are done for the year. They can only come back off the PUP list. #6 on your original post can't happen.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
8 years ago

Wayne, if a player gets IRed, they are done for the year. They can only come back off the PUP list. #6 on your original post can't happen.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



It's a new rule.

Teams can take 1 player off IR during the season. However that player can't be put on IR before the cut down to 53.

Last season was the first year with that new rule. At that time, you had to name the player you wanted to bring back, at the time you first IR'd him. I think we used it on Quarless.

This year, you can bring back any player you want from IR, you don't have to designate that player at the time that you place them on IR. But you can only re-activate one player.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
steveishere
8 years ago

Wayne, if a player gets IRed, they are done for the year. They can only come back off the PUP list. #6 on your original post can't happen.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Teams are allowed to bring 1 IR player back as long as they have been on IR for 6 weeks I believe. They have to have been put on IR after the cut to 53 though.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
Thanks guys. I forgot about the 6 weeks min on IR.
Here's the story that goes along with the change in the IR rule for this year. 


NFL owners passed a change to the league's bylaws Wednesday, proposed by the Buffalo Bills, that will give teams more flexibility in deciding which player they designate to return from injured reserve.

The new bylaw will allow teams to choose one player to return to practice among their players already on injured reserve, provided that player has spent at least six weeks on injured reserve. That player would then be able to return to the active roster and play in a game two weeks later.

The NFL's previous rule, adopted in 2012, required teams to designate the player they wanted to return from injured reserve at the time they placed him on the list. That player would then be eligible to return to practice in six weeks and play two weeks later.


UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (28m) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (12h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (12h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (12h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (16h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (18h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (20h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (20h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (21h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (22h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (22h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.