DakotaT
8 years ago



Frankly, I think the third option is where we are going with this. I thought they drafted Bakhtiari to play right tackle or guard. I never saw him as a left tackle. He doesn't have the quickness or the measurables. Spriggs does. If you draw up a left tackle on paper, then it'll look a lot like him. He has the size, quickness, and strength to man the position for a decade. Honestly, I think this is what's going to happen.

LT: Briggs
LG: Bakhtiari
C: Tretter
RG: Lang
RT: Bulaga

With that said, I'm not sure I'm comfortable seeing the Packers shuffle guys around their offensive line this late in the process. They could have easily trotted out the above lineup in 2017, and rolled with what they had in 2016. Perhaps Spriggs impressed them so much, that they can't keep him off the field. That's my theory. I just don't know how I feel about it, yet.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



That would work for now, and next year they let Lang walk, put Lindsley back at center and kick tretter to right guard. Big problem being Bahktiari wanting free agent left tackle money in his contract year. I would say the tackle to move inside would be Bulaga, and kick Bahktiari over to RT and Spriggs at LT.
UserPostedImage
beast
8 years ago

I think the Packers have a long-term plan in place. It's not Lane Taylor or Don Barclay, so let's just try to chill.

Here are some options:

1. Move J.C. Tretter to guard and keep a healthy Corey Linsley at center. (Obviously, not happening in the short-term.)
2. Move Bryan Bulaga to guard and play Jason Spriggs at right tackle.
3. Kick David Bakhtiari inside to guard; Start Jason Spriggs at Left Tackle.

Frankly, I think the third option is where we are going with this. I thought they drafted Bakhtiari to play right tackle or guard. I never saw him as a left tackle. He doesn't have the quickness or the measurables. Spriggs does. If you draw up a left tackle on paper, then it'll look a lot like him. He has the size, quickness, and strength to man the position for a decade. Honestly, I think this is what's going to happen.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



First off, Barclay played RT pretty well for an OG... he struggled with speed around the edge, but if he could get his hands on guys, he normally stopped them in their tracks. On the inside he should be able to keep up with the DTs.

As far as the 3rd option... I hate it... I don't care how a player looks... I care about how a player plays... and Bak looks like an OG but he plays like an LT. He simply doesn't have the power for OG... it's his biggest weakness... and playing him against even more powerful players is a good idea? I don't think so. Also Spriggs looked like a great LT... so why wasn't he drafted like one? Because he does NOT play like one (yet)... he's not consistent enough to be trusted as a starting LT unless you don't have a better option and the Packers do with Bak.

UserPostedImage
luigis
8 years ago
There are no options. Taylor will start at LG.

Barclay is the backup for both guard positions and center, maybe even RT (chills).
Spriggs is the backup at LT.
Murphy is there because Teddy drafted him, the kid can't play.

Luis
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
8 years ago
This is a good if Sitton's back (or some other injury we don't know about) means he's done as an effective player. If it's the back, then we'll know soon when it's announced he "failed a physical" with a team who would have signed him and that other term releases/IRs him or whatever. Or if he doesn't sign by the second game of the season.

I can't think of any other scenario under which this move makes sense.

I think that Porky's third option is the most likely, too. And long term, I think Spriggs is going to be the LT, regardless. However, I still don't see the rationale of letting Sitton go now. (Anyone who saw practices or talks to Packer players in GB stores know anything about how much Bakhtiari has practiced at G in, say, the last two years?

I want to know what Aaron Rodgers really thinks. Something tells me his "happy feet" problem is only going to get worse this year. Unless he gets injured first, that is.

Not only does the team not have anyone who has demonstrated anything close to being able to perform at Sitton's level, who is Bahktiari going to have to help him out?

Unless something magic happens, the left side of the line is going to peak at "mediocre" this year.

And here I was hoping I wouldn't have to bitch about the OL this year. Hah. That dead horse just got resuscitated.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
uffda udfa
8 years ago
Great move for the locker room...



UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
8 years ago

There are no options. Taylor will start at LG.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



There are always options. And I'm not sold on Taylor being the best one (yet).
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
8 years ago
Taylor blows. It has to be a line reshuffle which is exactly what you want going into the season. I guess it really didn't matter we were so scared to play our whole offense there wasn't any continuity anyway.

Ultimately, the one indisputable fact from this whole speculation over Sitton is...

We got NOTHING for a pro bowl G. Nothing. Brett Favre made himself a public spectacle and was held onto "for the good of the org" so we could get something for him. When it comes to Sitton there was nothing public and he gets released for...again...nothing. Bad business. Bad GM'ing. You took a pro bowl guard and released him instead of getting something at some point. It was really for the good of this org? LOL...Yes, the Favre drama was for the good of the org. We got picks out of it. No drama with Sitton...no picks. Logical.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
8 years ago

We literally don't know who is starting where on the OL in Jax. Doesn't sound like a great plan to me.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Yeah that's a problem isn't it? Thing is no where is it required for the average fan know. TeddyT and Coach Mikey need to know. You will see shortly.
UserPostedImage
luigis
8 years ago

Taylor blows. It has to be a line reshuffle which is exactly what you want going into the season. I guess it really didn't matter we were so scared to play our whole offense there wasn't any continuity anyway.

Ultimately, the one indisputable fact from this whole speculation over Sitton is...

We got NOTHING for a pro bowl G. Nothing. Brett Favre made himself a public spectacle and was held onto "for the good of the org" so we could get something for him. When it comes to Sitton there was nothing public and he gets released for...again...nothing. Bad business. Bad GM'ing. You took a pro bowl guard and released him instead of getting something at some point. It was really for the good of this org? LOL...Yes, the Favre drama was for the good of the org. We got picks out of it. No drama with Sitton...no picks. Logical.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Trust me, we are not releasing Sitton to reshuffle the entire line and make all TC worthless. Taylor will play LG and all the others will keep their positions.
They trust Taylor can play as Sitton. I kind of like Taylor, but I would have never in my sanity released Sitton for no compensation.
Luis
DakotaT
8 years ago

Trust me, we are not releasing Sitton to reshuffle the entire line and make all TC worthless. Taylor will play LG and all the others will keep their positions.
They trust Taylor can play as Sitton. I kind of like Taylor, but I would have never in my sanity released Sitton for no compensation.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



So what's your take when Lindsley is healthy? Who plays center and who plays LG?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
TheKanataThrilla (3m) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (4m) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (51m) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (52m) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (3h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (3h) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (4h) : I should have put it in quotes
dfosterf (4h) : It is the title of a you tube video.
dfosterf (4h) : I'm not assuming anything
beast (10h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (15h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (15h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (15h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (22h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

3h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.