wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

By not spending big money on other team's unrestricted free agents, GM Ted Thompson is able to keep his own players. When's the last time the Packers lost a really good young starter? The answer is offensive lineman Mike Wahle in 2005. Since then, Thompson has been able to lock up, among others, Bryan Bulaga, MorganContinue Reading›› 

Continue Reading @ Michael Rodney 

Michael Rodney wrote:



We had discussed Uncle Teddy's shortcomings many times. But what else do we have to talk about this time of the year?
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
8 years ago
And how many times has Ted been content to re-sign his own average/serviceable starter instead of going after a FA who would be an upgrade?

"Signing your own players" is important. But it's also important to recognize that many of your players can possibly be improved on.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
nerdmann
8 years ago
I'm still the only one to have commented on the article at the site. I guess it's because I'm right, and everybody knows it.

The last couple years, I thought the biggest thing that prevented us from succeeding in the playoffs was Mike’s fear-based game management. Belichek doesn’t mind running up the score. For some reason, Mike just emotionally clenches down and wants to run out the clock in the third quarter.

Overall though, I think Ted’s biggest problem when it comes to players is the training staff. It just seems like our guys are hurt more often and more seriously than other teams. That one year Bulaga popped a knee ligament in the Family Night scrimmage, and kept on playing for the rest of the series.

I mean, a dude is just playing, to traumatic impact, no twisting, and his knee just falls apart? What’s up with that?

How many GMs draft even ONE Nick Collins, much less, then having to turn around and find another one? The list goes on. Jermicheal Finley. Ted drafts Eddie Lacy AND JOhnathan Franklin in the same draft. Only gets to keep one of them.

Not all these guys have injury histories either. Ted gambled on Justin Harrell, but look at some of these other guys. Derrick Sherrod was starting to stabilize when he went down too. Talk all the smack you want about how he was a bust, but iirc he had no training camp due to the lockout, then they tried to move him to G, which was never going to work, the dude is just too enormous and lanky. But yeah. Sherrod was just getting his feet under him when he broke the HELL out of that leg. Keep in mind Ted had a 4th rounder who came out of nowhere and has held the LT position down for a few years.

Ted also had a guy (Tretter) who could have been serviceable last year, but he didn’t see the field until what, 3 weeks later?

What’s that trainer’s name, the guy who works for Stanford football? He came in and reduced injuries by 87% in his first year there. They’ve been doing pretty well over there. So this is not a coincidence.

Anyway, these guys would all be in their prime right now. Terrance Murphy. That dude was the real deal. Even a guy like Dez Bishop, gone to injury. Ted gets us plenty of players, it’s just that a large portion of the time, he has to go out and do it all over again.

And he DOES.


“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DoddPower
8 years ago

And how many times has Ted been content to re-sign his own average/serviceable starter instead of going after a FA who would be an upgrade?

"Signing your own players" is important. But it's also important to recognize that many of your players can possibly be improved on.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



I don't think Ted questions whether some outside players could theoretically help the Packers. I think the risk or uncertainly just bothers him, especially when usually coupled with an inflated value and potential compensatory selection implications. When players are drafted, developed, and have only played for the Packers, they are essentially indoctrinated in their philosophy, as Greg Jennings alluded in the past. I think "outsiders" sometimes make Ted nervous. Maybe he thinks they will come in and start saying things to young players like "Well team X does things this way, and it's much better, etc." Ted just has to feel completely comfortable with the risks of free agency, and most of the time, other General Managers will be willing to take more risks than Ted Thompson, which is why most of the free agents sign elsewhere.
Bigbyfan
8 years ago
I miss the days of "I Love Greg Jennings" threads.... now every thread seems to end up with people arguing /complaining about the same two things.
blank
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

I miss the days of "I Love Greg Jennings" threads.... now every thread seems to end up with people arguing /complaining about the same two things.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



You're more than welcome to create topics. There is a little Current Headlines thing on the left or you can go to Packers > Current Headlines and find the most current 50 headlines. It is FREE. 😁 It does not cost you a single penny and only a few moments of your time. And I'm seeing a lot more discussions more so than arguing/complaining lately. Sorry you're seeing just those two things.
UserPostedImage
TheKanataThrilla
8 years ago
Will his way work when we don't have a MVP/HoF caliber QB?
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

I'm still the only one to have commented on the article at the site. I guess it's because I'm right, and everybody knows it.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Ancient history. Look at this year's FA list. Tell me what Terrance Murphy's injury has to do with not picking up the phone and making a causal inquiry about Trevathan?
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

I miss the days of "I Love Greg Jennings" threads.... now every thread seems to end up with people arguing /complaining about the same two things.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



As I said discussing Uncle Teddy and his shortcomings is all we have at this time of the year. Do you want to talk about Gregorious? Ok begin...
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

I don't think Ted questions whether some outside players could theoretically help the Packers. I think the risk or uncertainly just bothers him, especially when usually coupled with an inflated value and potential compensatory selection implications. When players are drafted, developed, and have only played for the Packers, they are essentially indoctrinated in their philosophy, as Greg Jennings alluded in the past. I think "outsiders" sometimes make Ted nervous. Maybe he thinks they will come in and start saying things to young players like "Well team X does things this way, and it's much better, etc." Ted just has to feel completely comfortable with the risks of free agency, and most of the time, other General Managers will be willing to take more risks than Ted Thompson, which is why most of the free agents sign elsewhere.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



ANY GM in ANY sport who will not look at all the avenues available to him/her in order to improve the team is suspect. You can't play scared and you can't manage scared. We have seen Mikey's failures because he is afraid to lose and then usually does. Let's blame the QB, special teams or fill in the blank player for the loss.

Uncle Teddy can not afford to limit the opportunities that are out there. Well actually he can. Too many fans are more than happy with a 10-6 record and then go 0-1 or 1-1 in the playoffs. Teddy has the easiest gig on the planet and he knows it. There is no owner looking over his shoulder. They print money any time they want to. Fans hand it over all day long and are happy about it. If anyone dares question him, fans scream about how spoiled we have it because xyz team has not made the playoffs in 50 years.

These fans then point to all the huge contracts that other teams give and the players who fail to live up to those contracts. But that is not every single FA every single year. You don't have to over pay and at the same time you don't have to dumpster dive either. Maybe Trevathan wouldn't be the answer. We will never know because Uncle Teddy wouldn't even call his agent. What would have happened if he bumped the price one time? Ryan Pace and Co would have bumped their offer at least once too. Fox wanted him too badly to only make one offer and then walk away. Especially given Teddy's MO of never going after quality FAs. They would have assumed this would not turn into a long drawn out bidding war..
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (14m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (22m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (34m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.