I don't love the 1 year deal. Just kicking the can down the street to what will be a chaotic 2017 offseason.
Originally Posted by: musccy
I agree, I don't like the one year part, it's a one year prove it deal, and it's not even a low prove it deal. I think it would of been better if it was conditional, like he had to have ___ many sacks or play ___% of the time to get the full amount. Of course they could of just been matching another team or something, and Neal did have a four million per year deal before the cap went higher.
Also I'd like to have Hayward back (at least if the price is right). He's very good in the nickel role, and really teams play in nickel something like 70% of the time, and it seems to be going up. Plus while I normally really like Hyde, last year seemed to be an off year for him. Plus Hayward keeps Rollins in the dime role which he seemed to dominate at and gives us more CB depth.