Zero2Cool
9 years ago

Doesn't surprise me.

Quit putting words in mouth.

I'll give you a hint - if a team is top 5 in the ESPN power rankings, and our soft team plays them - you might want place a bet against the Packers.

Please see the Sherman Packers. They were the kings of beating the weak sisters and getting pounded by physical teams.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 


ESPN rankings? Most ignorant random list out there.

Here. I help.

Zero Rankings > ESPN Rankings.

Now you know! 😂

UserPostedImage
DakotaT
9 years ago

ESPN rankings? Most ignorant random list out there.

Here. I help.

Zero Rankings > ESPN Rankings.

Now you know! 😂

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



That's like getting football tips from a Vikings fan.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

That's like getting football tips from a Vikings fan.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Any and every Vikings fan has enough sense not to trust ESPN. Think of the QBR and nothing needs said. 😎
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

I've never understood this statement.

A team can only play who is on their schedule.

So you are saying the 6 teams The Packers have beaten fall into the weak sister category.

Which teams remaining on their schedule do you NOT consider a weak sister?
I would like to know in advance so I can go against the Packers in Pick em.
I need to make up a few games.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



True, a team can only play the next opponent on their schedule. No disagreement there.

The Packers have failed to beat an opponent with a winning record on the road in a few seasons now. I think it goes back to 2012 or maybe it was 2010. Either way, that is not good. You cannot win a Super Bowl when you can't even beat any team on the road that has a winning record.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
9 years ago
It's pretty difficult to explain to homers that their team is soft, when they refuse to take off their blinders. Oh well, can't say some of us haven't tried.
UserPostedImage
luigis
9 years ago

True, a team can only play the next opponent on their schedule. No disagreement there.

The Packers have failed to beat an opponent with a winning record on the road in a few seasons now. I think it goes back to 2012 or maybe it was 2010. Either way, that is not good. You cannot win a Super Bowl when you can't even beat any team on the road that has a winning record.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Some people say "coaches are good, the problem is the talent/players", now I wonder how can the same players play well at home and not be able to win a single game against a good team on the road for YEARS.


Luis
Laser Gunns
9 years ago
Packers: good enough to make bad teams look bad, average teams look average... And good teams look unstoppable.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

True, a team can only play the next opponent on their schedule. No disagreement there.

The Packers have failed to beat an opponent with a winning record on the road in a few seasons now. I think it goes back to 2012 or maybe it was 2010. Either way, that is not good. You cannot win a Super Bowl when you can't even beat any team on the road that has a winning record.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



That may be true and and I Will agree that's not good.
However that is not the same as saying all they do is beat "weak sisters".

Top 5 in power rankings(anybody's), means that in any given week there are 27 "weak sisters".

S omebody wants to call me a "homer", because I understand that The Packers are not going to win every game and I don't panic when they do lose, then I guess I'm a "homer".

I'm not blind to the fact the Packers have problems, mostly due to injuries, but I sure as hell not going to panic and join the "Fire Everyone" crowd as a solution.

8 games don't make a season.

There's only 1 fan base HAPPY at the end of every year.

I always hope The Packers will win that last game, disappointing when they don't but it's not the end of the world.


I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Fan Shout
beast (14h) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.