Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago
We got one of our lost young ducklings back in Thomas. Now I'm hoping we can sign Henry back to PS.

After we signed Perillo yesterday Denver cut Mitchell Henry. They cut him before week 6 so he didn't accrue a full season and replaced him w/ a street FA. If faced w/ a choice between Denver's and GB's PS, he should chose GB's.

W/ Q being a UFA and maybe facing a suspension next year he should realize he's behind Rodgers and Perillo. In Denver he'd be behind Daniels and Green, who are under contract until 2018. Plus, GB will have a stud QB over the next 5 years; Denver, probably not.

To sweeten the pot, it'd cost about 300K more at this juncture; GB should pay his salary as if on the 53!

Of course, he would then provide sweet intel on Denver's O and D, cause he's a smart kid!
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago
Why would we want this guy? He never showed anything in preseason (unlike Thomas). Just to give us intel on Denver? Peyton improvises so much that it wouldn't make much difference. Anyway, we're way better than the Broncos.

Better R. Rodgers, Quarless (in a while), Backman, and probably even Perillo.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
beast
9 years ago

cause he's a smart kid!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 


That made it sound like you have some sort of man-crush on him.

We got one of our lost young ducklings back in Thomas. Now I'm hoping we can sign Henry back to PS.

After we signed Perillo yesterday Denver cut Mitchell Henry....
W/ Q being a UFA and maybe facing a suspension next year he should realize he's behind Rodgers and Perillo. In Denver he'd be behind Daniels and Green, who are under contract until 2018. Plus, GB will have a stud QB over the next 5 years; Denver, probably not.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Packers IRed S Richardson, brought up TE Perillo and signed CB/S Kyle Sebetic to the practice squad. So the Packers already have gotten "one of our lost young ducklings back" in Sebetic, who I liked his potential to possibility play back-up S.

So with no free spots, bring back TE Mitchell Henry would involve releasing/cutting someone, looking at the PS it's most likely be TE Henry vs TE Blake Annen (who's already on the practice squad). Henry might be the better long term prospect when it comes to reachable potential.

But like you said he could sign else where too, in GB he's behind Rodgers, Backman and Perillo (for now) and in Denver is behind Daniels, Green, Gordon (who they released him for) and have their own prospect on their PS.



UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

That made it sound like you have some sort of man-crush on him.


Packers IRed S Richardson, brought up TE Perillo and signed CB/S Kyle Sebetic to the practice squad. So the Packers already have gotten "one of our lost young ducklings back" in Sebetic, who I liked his potential to possibility play back-up S.

So with no free spots, bring back TE Mitchell Henry would involve releasing/cutting someone, looking at the PS it's most likely be TE Henry vs TE Blake Annen (who's already on the practice squad). Henry might be the better long term prospect when it comes to reachable potential.

But like you said he could sign else where too, in GB he's behind Rodgers, Backman and Perillo (for now) and in Denver is behind Daniels, Green, Gordon (who they released him for) and have their own prospect on their PS.


Originally Posted by: beast 



They already had their choice. They signed Sebetic.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
9 years ago

They already had their choice. They signed Sebetic.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



They had their choice of available FAs.... TE Henry wasn't available then, so no they didn't have their choice between TE Henry and the others currently on the PS as until after they signed Sebetic (since the 53 man cut down).

And besides with Richardson going to the IR, I think they wanted another DB on the practice squad. They might like one TE over another TE still on the practice squad. I doubt they switch out, but you never know.

I also wonder if we'll be seeing more of Backman or Perillo at TE with Quarless gone... I don't think Backman is ready, but if he were, he might be the Packers best deep threat from the TE position.

UserPostedImage
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago

Why would we want this guy? He never showed anything in preseason (unlike Thomas). Just to give us intel on Denver? Peyton improvises so much that it wouldn't make much difference. Anyway, we're way better than the Broncos.

Better R. Rodgers, Quarless (in a while), Backman, and probably even Perillo.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



I thought that he didn't do much either; until i saw Denver put him on their 53! Then i said, wowwwwwww nelly, what did i miss! Think about it: probably 50 UDFA and late round TEs were released on final cut downs and Denver picked this guy and tossed their 53rd best player into the sea for him. I keep a min of 2 years of preseason games [FYI😁] and I went through the games and charted everyone of Henry's plays. In the games he showed wayyyyyy more than Backman and to my surprise more than Perillo. Now I'm not saying cut Backman 'cause he has super upside and the guy has desire, so, unless he's Janisly challenged he will be successful.

Henry had only 1 catch; but he had a club on his had for the first 3 PS games [Saints 3Q, 3:10], he ran a sweet route exactly where he was supposed to be and made the catch going to the ground.

But, I was really watching him: EG in 4Q 13:06 2nd goal from 16; beats the LB badly and is wide open in EZ, but Hundley hit White underneath.

4th Q 7:17 he and White are split right, as they are breaking the huddle it is Henry that tells White where he's supposed to line-up. White catches his 2nd TD and Tex says Henry did nothing😲 😂.

Go to 3Q at 11:01 and beyond in Philly game and watch this kid block with a big club; he also played 1st team KOR and Punt special teams w/ the club. Awesome.

3rd Q 13:44 Pitts game, speaking of Janisly challenged: Janis was playing X and Henry the H [in line]. Henry ran a 5 yard square out, got separation and Tolzein threw a perfect strike. But Janis was in wrong spot and his guy cut in front on Henry. This really pissed me off 'cause I wanted to see if Henry could catch that pass with the club on.

I'll bet Denver sent a mole to our practices and saw this guy catching everything with that club on.

In Denver he was active for 2 games [Week 3 and 5] he played on 2 ST team units for them and got one offensive snap.



That made it sound like you have some sort of man-crush on him.


Packers IRed S Richardson, brought up TE Perillo and signed CB/S Kyle Sebetic to the practice squad. So the Packers already have gotten "one of our lost young ducklings back" in Sebetic, who I liked his potential to possibility play back-up S.

So with no free spots, bring back TE Mitchell Henry would involve releasing/cutting someone, looking at the PS it's most likely be TE Henry vs TE Blake Annen (who's already on the practice squad). Henry might be the better long term prospect when it comes to reachable potential.

But like you said he could sign else where too, in GB he's behind Rodgers, Backman and Perillo (for now) and in Denver is behind Daniels, Green, Gordon (who they released him for) and have their own prospect on their PS.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I got man crushes on all potential 1st contract studs; and proud of it!

Yes agreed I like Sebetic too.

Annen has been with 3-4 programs and with his Lyerla-type measureables something is wrong for him to keep being released. He's the guy i think must go. but whatever; Henry was one of our best 63, If he wants to come, then we gotta keep him. Maybe Bradford goes or Williams or Robinson. [Dont forget we need a spot for Pinkard in a few weeks too].

They had their choice of available FAs.... TE Henry wasn't available then, so no they didn't have their choice between TE Henry and the others currently on the PS as until after they signed Sebetic (since the 53 man cut down).

And besides with Richardson going to the IR, I think they wanted another DB on the practice squad. They might like one TE over another TE still on the practice squad. I doubt they switch out, but you never know.

I also wonder if we'll be seeing more of Backman or Perillo at TE with Quarless gone... I don't think Backman is ready, but if he were, he might be the Packers best deep threat from the TE position.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Yes! Henry wasn't released until after Perillo was promoted and probably after Sebetic was offered a job.

And Backman is not ready; but Perillo is. And I'm guessing MM's got some deep surprises packages in store for us with Backman in the future. Maybe we'll see some 2 TE stuff this week w/ Rodgers and Perillo.

PS I got a man crush on Perillo too!
Zero2Cool
9 years ago

UserPostedImage
beast
9 years ago

They already had their choice. They signed Sebetic.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


and now Henry... told you they didn't have their full choice then [whip2]

Annen has been with 3-4 programs and with his Lyerla-type measureables something is wrong for him to keep being released. He's the guy i think must go. but whatever; Henry was one of our best 63, If he wants to come, then we gotta keep him.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Yeah I don't think Annen has gotten used to route running, he seems like an H-back blocker with more potential that he'll probably never be able to reach. Where Henry seems like a natural receiver with more upside potential that's reachable, and as a couple of TEs have talked about, they came into the NFL not liking or not having any idea how to block and you can learn to block, much harder for them to learn how to be a good receiver.


UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Aha!

He's white. No wonder everyone's all excited.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
greengold
9 years ago

Aha!

He's white. No wonder everyone's all excited.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



You are joking, right? RIGHT?

I hope so.

Dude that got released, Blake Annen? He's white too. It happens, some players are white. 🤬

Mitchell Henry had some highlight reel catches this spring despite having a broken finger for much of camp. The coaches had a lot invested in him and hoped to sneak him onto the practice squad. Unfortunately he didn't clear waivers.

Now he's back. Skin color has nothing to do with it. If that was a joke, apologize. If it wasn't a joke, grow up!
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (17h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (17h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Rude!
beast (21h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

17h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.