Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
9 years ago
BLOCKING: Adv. Rodgers

Rodgers: On Lacy 8 yard run [last play of 3rd Q] a hole open in right A gap only problem Aaron Donald is standing right in the middle of it. Then BAM Rodgers smacks him out of the hole pinning him up against the scrum of Linsley/Walker/Laurenitis/Brockers. Again Rodgers MOVED Donald OUT OF THE HOLE!!!!!

Graham: Couldn’t block my grandma.

RECEIVING: Adv Graham-but not by alot

Rodgers: 25 Targets 19 catches 155 yards 8.2 avg 2 Td’s; 1 run 11 yards; 1 DPI, 1 2 point conv.

Graham: 28, 21, 204, 9.7, 2, 0, 0, 0

And Graham had 23 more snaps through 4 games

Graham leads his team in targets and we know Rodgers is the 3rd or 4th option behind Adams, Cobb and maybe Jones.

SPECIAL TEAMS: Adv. Rodgers
Jimmy Graham don’t play STs and Rodgers plays the all important edge blocker on FG unit and important “wedge” role on KORs.

PENALTIES: By end of year Adv. Rodgers
Last year Rodgers; one for 5 yards; and he’s had 2 [playing TE] this year 1 10 yard holding; 1 Illegal block for 15 yards.

Graham no penalties this year but 11 penalties for 85 yards in the 3 year period between 2012-14

FUMBLES: Adv. Rodgers
Both have zero fumbles this year. But 5 career Fumbles for Graham; zero Rodgers

DROPS: Adv. Rodgers
Both have no drops this year [Rodgers was not given a drop for the play yesterday]. Career wise Rodgers has 1 drop in 55 targets [a 1.8% drop rate]; Graham 35 drops in 623 [a horrible 5.6% career drop rate].

TOOLNESS: Huge Adv. Graham
He chooses not to learn to block for his team

In 2013, in a game v. Falcons Graham dunked over the goal post and knocked the goal post out of kilter causing almost a 30 minute delay in the game. So the league passed a rule, for obvious and good reason that they’ll be no more dunking. Only a sociopath would be offended by such a rule. Graham last year before a PS game was warned he’d be penalized if he dunked; in protest he dunked TWICE causing a 15 yard penalty each time.

In 2015, Graham was going to cost the Saints an $8M cap hit. They traded him and suffered a cap hit of $9M. It cost NO 1M of their cap to get rid of him. Usually teams get rid of guys to save cap money; NO was desperate to get rid of him.
beast
9 years ago

I still think of Graham as one of the best (potential) possession wide receivers in the NFL. I agree with the idea that Graham is more of a WR than a TE.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
9 years ago

I still think of Graham as one of the best (potential) possession wide receivers in the NFL. I agree with the idea that Graham is more of a WR than a TE.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Graham would undoubtedly be a MUCH better receiver in the Packers offense than Richard Rodgers. But ultimately, I'm glad the Packers didn't trade for him.
yooperfan
9 years ago
I believe that Seattle throwing the big bucks at Graham who is not a complete player because he simply refuses to be a blocker has created a "chemistry" mess in Seattle.
Thankfully Ted didn't go down that road.
Graham is a helluva receiver but I'll take Richard Rodgers at tightend any day.
No "chemistry" problems in Green Bay.
Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Jimmy Graham is a Ferrari, sure, it would be nice to have one, but the Packers are better off with a truck that does the heavy lifting. The Truck (Richard Rodgers) is going to cost less overall and have lower insurance payments and give more production where needed.

Graham is a Wide Receiver and sooner Seattle uses him as such, sooner they will get more bang for their buck. Right now, they have a Ferrari sitting in the garage while they try racing with a Ford Fairmont.
UserPostedImage
musccy
9 years ago
PFT Jimmy Graham 

PFT tried to blame the Seahawks for trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, which I understand to a point...many of us predicted the issues this creates for a running - based team to essentially give up 2 blockers (Unger and whoever graham was replacing on the field).

To keep this Packers related, yes, I prefer RRODG who has less talent, but chooses to be a more complete player.
nerdmann
9 years ago
RR needs to get more yards per reception. He needs to get down the seam once in awhile.

However the Packers seem to have gone almost exclusive with the short passing game of late. So much so that the Rams were jumping those short routes. I'm all for high percentage passing, but when they jump the short routes, that's when you pump fake and throw it over their heads.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
dhazer
9 years ago
I see alot of people including the media say how much talent Graham has, but does he really? I don't even think he can sniff Gronks jockstrap. Does Graham have more talent than Rodgers? Well as many have stated he doesn't block and he gives up on plays if its not for him. He is a big wr but if he was to lineup at Wr all the time he wouldnt do much. He lineups against safetys and LBs where he has the mismatch advantage.

Graham is like a 8 for receiving and a 1 or 2 for blocking and I see Rodgers as a 6 or 7 for blocking and a 5 or 6 for receiving, so lets look at the totals Graham has a total of 9 or 10 and Rodgers has a 11 or 13. To me that would say Rodgers has more talent.


People along with the media fall into the fantasy stats as talent. They regualar guys that just bring their lunchbox to work don't get the hype. Hell people cut down Quarless but who was our TE for the year we won the Super Bowl and who always was there to fill in for Finely when he got hurt. Quarless just did his job which for TE in this offense isn't alot in the passing game.


Ok that was just my thoughts now start your attacks now 😁
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
beast
9 years ago

I believe that Seattle throwing the big bucks at Graham who is not a complete player because he simply refuses to be a blocker has created a "chemistry" mess in Seattle.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



I don't think Graham refuses to block, I remember Graham giving CB Woodson one hell of a day blocking him all over the place... Woodson would beat the first block attempt but Grahams arms were SOOOO F'N long that he would be able to reset them and get a second block attempted in on Woodson before Woodson was able to get past him and that CLEARLY was pissing Woodson off... as he just wasn't used to it. Graham can block DBs (like WRs are asked to do), but he can't block guys with more power (like TEs are asked to do more often).


And I don't think the reason is because he refused too, but he aggressive blocks DBs... I think it's more physical reasons like he's arms are super long and lanky with no muscle and can be overpowered fairly easily even when giving proper blocking techniques... length without power can be a HUGE problem even more so when you get into leverage... which is why every year the NFL has some 6'7" or taller OTs struggle to make it, they might have the length but they don't have the leverage and might not have the power, or if they do have the power in an anchored stance can't be mobile while in the anchored stance and can run around them.

Because of Graham's height he simple loses the leverage battle if the defender gets into his pads enough, and he doesn't have the power to keep more powerful defenders out of his pads.


Graham is also struggling because the Saints worked off a spot offense, and told players to get to this or that spot... where the Seahawks (like the Packers) work off an adjustment or read offense where you have a basic plan set up but players are asked to adjust based on how they're reading the defense. Graham who mostly played basketball in college with one year of football is still adjusting to have to read and react vs. just get to a spot every time.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
9 years ago
I think Graham would substantially improve the Packers passing game. But that still doesn't make him worth trading a 1st round pick, and solid offensive linemen, and a huge salary.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (4h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (9h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (9h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (10h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (10h) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (12h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (14h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (14h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (14h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (14h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (14h) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (14h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (14h) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (14h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (14h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Around The NFL / wpr

9h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22h / Around The NFL / beast

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.