Bryan Bulaga's return to Packers could come sooner, not later

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

Bryan Bulaga's return to Packers could come sooner, not later

Continue Reading @ Rob Demovsky

Rob Demovsky wrote:

Wouldn't THIS be sweet.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

DakotaT
Select Member

9 years ago

The last thing we need is to rush him back. What we do need is a tight end that blocks well.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

9 years ago

Looking at the schedule I think we shouldn't rush and just wait to make sure he is healthy for Denver as we will certainly need him from what I have seen from the Broncos D.

FLORIDA PACKER88
Member

9 years ago

The last thing we need is to rush him back. What we do need is a tight end that blocks well.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

While Rodgers isn't quite Q level in terms of holding his blocks, if you watched you saw him block very well in the run game and I saw him hold up in pass pro the few times they asked him to do so. I think he's gonna be a very complete Tightend for years to come.

DoddPower
Veteran Member

9 years ago

Originally Posted by: FLORIDA PACKER88

Hopefully he will continue to become a well-rounded tight end, because I don't think he's ever going to be a dangerous receiving threat. Me thinks he would make a great #2 TE along with a more dangerous seam-stretcher with very good speed and 6'5+.

FLORIDA PACKER88
Member

9 years ago

Originally Posted by: DoddPower

He's not going to be Finley, but he's already proven his worth as a redzone threat and ability to find space. Tough to find those seam stretchers these days really.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

He's not going to be Finley, but he's already proven his worth as a redzone threat and ability to find space. Tough to find those seam stretchers these days really.

Originally Posted by: FLORIDA PACKER88

Give me steady Eddie over a shit talker who never actually produces.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

FLORIDA PACKER88
Member

9 years ago

Give me steady Eddie over a shit talker who never actually produces.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Finley didn't "never" produce. He certainly had some very productive outings. He just didn't do it on a consistent basis and wasn't ever really able to "put it together." Dude had all the talent in the world, wish it could have been different!

DoddPower
Veteran Member

9 years ago

Originally Posted by: FLORIDA PACKER88

Yeah and it's not just Finley or Richard Rodgers as the two choices. Jordan Cameron would look pretty good in a Packers uniform. Richard Rodgers hasn't proved a whole lot to me yet. Almost any decent-to-average player will look decent at times catching passes for Aaron Rodgers. To me, that's what he's looked like so far. A decent player that will catch a few passes a game and the occasional touchdown. Not bad, but it could be much better. Hopefully he continues to develop in all other aspects of his game, as well.

RainX
Member

9 years ago

#10

I'd be 110% happy keeping Bryan out until after the bye. St. Louis and San Diego are winnable games at home and we've got a tough second half schedule. I'd rather have him completely healthy for the stretch run then to rush him back and re-aggravate his foot injury.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (9h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (22h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS