Packers wide receiver Ty Montgomery is a physical oddity in the NFL

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

Damn, even his muscles have muscles

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

DakotaT
Select Member

9 years ago

Packers wide receiver Ty Montgomery is a physical oddity in the NFL

Damn, even his muscles have muscles

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra

Brick shithouse with speed, agility and good hands; what could go wrong?

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

9 years ago

He should have received a bit of confidence based on his 4th Quarter performance. I don't really like the size and weight comparisons as a means of judging success. Those other players didn't have the best QB in the league throwing the ball to him. I like him working the middle of the field and use his obvious physical strength to get those YACs.

sschind
Senior Member

9 years ago

Packers wide receiver Ty Montgomery is a physical oddity in the NFL

Damn, even his muscles have muscles

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra

He has muscles in places I don't even have places.

DarkaneRules
Veteran Member

9 years ago

It's mindboggling how slow Janis is at picking shit up. Anyway, this isn't about him; Ty is a fucking beast!

Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance

steveishere
Veteran Member

9 years ago

Cobb actually has a similar build even though it seems most people look at him as a "smallish" WR.

dyeah_gb
Member

9 years ago

Ty really established himself as the real deal in the game against the Chiefs. He also made some rookie mistakes like blocking the DB before the catch that cost GB a TD. It is great that he gets to learn from these mistakes with a win and the team at 3-0.

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman

yooperfan
Veteran Member

9 years ago

This kid is going to be a good one.
He's contributing more than I thought he would, I figured him as strictly a return man who would be used on offense in some gimmick type plays.
Due to injuries he has had the opportunity to prove he can catch and contribute as a receiver.
It doesn't hurt that he's got the greatest QB in the universe delivering the ball.
Monty is going to be fun to watch for years to come.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

9 years ago

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb

We just can't put any blame on Aaron Rodgers for anything can we? lol ... If Rodgers throws that ball when he's supposed to, then there is no flag. Those plays are usually bang-bang and for whatever reason, Rodgers didn't release the ball fast enough. Maybe it was a bad snap? Maybe the ball wasn't gripped right? I don't know, but the ball is supposed to be out of his hand immediately on those routes.

I'm going with Rodgers with the bad on that play from what I witnessed and not Ty Montgomery.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#10

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb

That blocking before the catch could have just as easily been called on Jones. The ball gets snapped, they count 1 Mississippi, 2 Louisiana block. Cobb, jones, Nelson, Driver, Jennings have all been called for that at some point over the years.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (9m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (10m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (30m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS