Honestly, if you read what Carroll is saying (and not what he's implying)... Carroll is just agreeing with something I've said during the I've said it in the earlier games...
This week the refs as a whole were VERY slow at blowing the plays dead which lead to a number of players to keep playing even after the ball carrier was on the ground but before the refs blew the play official dead.
There was just some ridiculous moments, where the play should of been called dead but wasn't so some the players kept playing... the one that sticks out in my head the most was Cowboys TE Witten caught a pass and was wrapped up and pushed backwards, clearly his forward progress had been stopped, but he was never dropped to the ground and the refs didn't blow the play dead. So one of the Eagles DL or OLB came from the line all the way to Witten and hit/tackled Witten.
The refs turned around and threw a yellow flag on the Eagles player for a late hit....
BUT really that wasn't on the player, and that wasn't a late hit based on when the whistle was blown because it was blown very very late. That hit (like a couple of other this weekend) was clearly on the refs not blowing plays dead when they're dead but waiting a while and assuming the players known it's over...
Since it happened across a number of NFL games, I'm guessing the NFL told the refs to not be quick on blowing the plays dead or something. But in some cases that was good, in other cases that lead to a lot of extra activities which didn't count for nothing... which is what Carol is verbally (in words) complaining about... the refs didn't blow the play dead when it was dead, so there was a of extra activities (which the Seahawks won in the pile) but didn't count because the play was dead.
Now he's implying it should of count... now I disagree there... the ref should of blown the play dead when it was dead.