Packers playing in London 2016

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25241204/report-packers-to-play-in-london-in-2016

Hope that doesn't cost us a home game and it doesn't. Jags are the home team.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

packerfanoutwest
Member

9 years ago

why does any team play outside the US? so dislike this

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

9 years ago

The NFL has this bizarre fascination with taking our game to the "world". MONEY, MONEY, MON AYYYYYY...

A team should NEVER play in London permanently. It's a logistical disadvantage for the team located there for all their road games and a huge advantage to them for all their home games.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

beast
Select Member

9 years ago

why does any team play outside the US? so dislike this

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest

Because the NFL owners are money hungry (like most big businesses) and they're close to maxing out of what they can get out of the US market, so they've been trying to build an over sea market for years if not decades so they can get even more.

The part I hate the most is they're claiming their trying to get enough interest to move a team over seas. Fans talk about plane ride / changing time zones and tax laws effecting the game enough... get a team over seas and that will only grow by 10 times or more. And in theory, if they're successful with this, in theory half the teams could be outside the US at some point in the very distance future. Of course as Mark Cuban suggested, if the NFL keeps trying to be over greedy, it could come to the down fall of the NFL, as maybe people less interested in it in every market if they were to get more teams over seas full time. Also I think they should take over Canada before attempting to get Europe. Because if they can't get Canada, then they probably can't get Europe.

Bigbyfan
Member

9 years ago

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

The fact that they want to take the Super Bowl (the biggest individual game in America) and play it in London disgusts me. It's called the NATIONAL Football League.

blank

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

9 years ago

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25241204/report-packers-to-play-in-london-in-2016

Hope that doesn't cost us a home game and it doesn't. Jags are the home team.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Precisely. There's no way the Packers will lose a home game. The Jags have pretty much the worst attendance in the NFL, and they have played quite a few home games in London for that reason. From the Packer perspective, they get a nationally televised game against what likely will still be in 2016 one of the worst teams in the NFL. I call that a win/win situation.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

Also I think they should take over Canada before attempting to get Europe. Because if they can't get Canada, then they probably can't get Europe.

Originally Posted by: beast

You stole my thunder. I have no clue how well the NFL is doing in Canada, but baby steps in Toronto with the Bills (as an example) seems to make a hell of a lot more sense to me than this bullheaded fascination with Europe that's been going on since (at least) the NFL Europe days.

It looks like it's 10ish hours for the Packers to fly there. They better damn well get their bye after this game.

Yerko
Senior Member

9 years ago

Originally Posted by: musccy

The thing with NFL moving into Canadian territory is that the people there don't really want it if it means it will overtake the CFL. The Canadians love their CFL.

With the NFL's current mindset, I doubt they'd want to share Canada with another league and people that are only half interested in their league. They'd want full takeover, which is why London is such a hot spot for them.

Why not Mexico? What ever happened to the whole Latino NFL movement?

I am not against playing games in London and I am on the fence about a franchise or two over there. They clearly have the interest of fans, why not continue to treat those fans?

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

The thing with NFL moving into Canadian territory is that the people there don't really want it if it means it will overtake the CFL. The Canadians love their CFL.

Originally Posted by: Yerko

I don't follow the CFL all that closely, I just see half-filled stadiums and wonder how much they love their sport.

I don't know if they'd embrace the NFL, but my point is it seems to make more sense to experiment with expansion where logistics are much more manageable and you have some sort of a history with the sport. See if you can expand on this hemisphere first.

You raise a good point about Mexico, I actually think it did OK in Mexico City a few years ago.

sschind
Senior Member

9 years ago

#10

Originally Posted by: musccy

Until they drank the water.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (2h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (3h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (3h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (3h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (4h) : Who? What?

beast (13h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (17h) : meh

Zero2Cool (21h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24