mi_keys
9 years ago

I could see us going 15-1 if our D is better. If the replacements for the 3 starters we lost fall on their faces I could see 9-7. Our O is outstanding enough that we should be able to outscore at least 9 opponents! I have to believe Ted Thompson feels he has decent replacements for the departed starters. This is all assuming no key long term injuries. I always think they "should" win all their games but of course that won't happen with the pretty tough schedule they have. So I'll say...12-4

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx 



I agree the defense is the bigger question mark, but I do wonder, other than Tramon did any of the other defensive departures play any significant snaps down the stretch/playoffs? I seem to recall House watching the Seattle game from the sidelines. Jones/Hawk I think saw limited snaps when Matthews went out for the last couple series. Unless I'm forgetting something I feel like we were largely playing fine with 3 of those 4 departures on the sideline anyway.

Overall I agree on total wins. I see them at around 11 or 12 with what we know right now.
Born and bred a cheesehead
greengold
9 years ago

3 starters we lost

Originally Posted by: PackerTraxx 



Except they didn't lose 3 starters. Hawk and Jones weren't starting at the end of the year, Tramon Williams is the only starter who is not returning.

If A.J. Hawk was listed as a starter it was a ceremonial title only. He played less than 30% of snaps the last several games.

Point taken, the draft class needs to step it up and contribute. But I don't see the situation as dire as some are portraying it.





Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
9 years ago

Home (6-2)
  1. L - Seattle Seahawks
  2. L - Kansas City Chiefs
  3. W - St. Louis Rams
  4. W - San Diego Chargers
  5. W - Detroit Lions
  6. W - Chicago Bears
  7. W - Dallas Cowboys
  8. W - Minnesota Vikings



Away (3-5)
  1. W - Chicago Bears
  2. L - San Francisco 49ers
  3. L - Denver Broncos
  4. L - Carolina Panthers
  5. L - Minnesota Vikings
  6. W - Detroit Lions
  7. W - Oakland Raiders
  8. L - Arizona Cardinals


Oops. No playoff happiness this year.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Poppa San
9 years ago
Home [7-1]

W - Seattle Seahawks
L - Kansas City Chiefs == never seem to play them goodly + emotional letdown after 2 big games
W - St. Louis Rams == squeeker
W - San Diego Chargers
W - Detroit Lions
W - Chicago Bears == Aaron lose with Favre in the house?
W - Dallas Cowboys == Just NOT going to lose two in a row and 3 outta 4.
W - Minnesota Vikings == Won't get swept by them.

Away [5-3]

W - Chicago Bears
W - San Francisco 49ers == Not as formidable on paper
W - Denver Broncos == don't bet against MM after the bye week
W - Carolina Panthers
L - Minnesota Vikings == Queens look to this to validate their playoff credentials
L - Detroit Lions == both teams have 11 days off. Detroit's SB this season.
W - Oakland Raiders
L - Arizona Cardinals == 2nd west coast trip in two weeks
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.

I awoke this morning with a headache. I still went to work. She went back to sleep.
Rockmolder
9 years ago

He gets Kudos for picking them at home but I have them winning in Lambeau and nothing is said lol. The running teams are going to kill us because we will be trying so hard to cover up our holes in the secondary.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



You've got us shitting ourselves every year. Already looking forward to your anual posts about the Lions really being the team to beat this year. 😝



Home (6 - 2)
  1. W - Seattle Seahawks
  2. W - Kansas City Chiefs
  3. W - St. Louis Rams
  4. L - San Diego Chargers
  5. W - Detroit Lions
  6. W - Chicago Bears
  7. L - Dallas Cowboys
  8. W - Minnesota Vikings



Away (5 - 3)
  1. W - Chicago Bears
  2. W - San Francisco 49ers
  3. L - Denver Broncos
  4. W - Carolina Panthers
  5. W - Minnesota Vikings
  6. L - Detroit Lions
  7. W - Oakland Raiders
  8. L - Arizona Cardinals

Zero2Cool
9 years ago
That first exhibition game has quite a few riled up. Would you like to add your record prediction or perhaps update the one you've done?
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

That first exhibition game has quite a few riled up. Would you like to add your record prediction or perhaps update the one you've done?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I still think we can go undefeated in regular season. Would really feel good about that if we had a defense or something at the TE position. I would guarantee a SB win if I felt better about both.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Bigbyfan
9 years ago

That first exhibition game has quite a few riled up. Would you like to add your record prediction or perhaps update the one you've done?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Do you still think we're gonna lose to the 49ers?
blank
gbguy20
9 years ago
Fuck the niners. shitty team. But damn does that rugby player look good.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
macbob
9 years ago
2015 Opponents

Barring AR injury.

Home (8 - 0 )

W - Chicago Bears
W - Seattle Seahawks
W - Kansas City Chiefs
W - St. Louis Rams
W - San Diego Chargers
W - Detroit Lions
W - Dallas Cowboys
W - Minnesota Vikings

Away (8 - 0)

W - Chicago Bears
W - San Francisco 49ers
W - Denver Broncos
W - Carolina Panthers
W - Minnesota Vikings
W - Detroit Lions
W - Oakland Raiders
W - Arizona Cardinals

The majority of the better teams are playing us at Lambeau (Sea, KC, StL, SD, Dal) vs on the road (Den, Ari).

Only two teams have their bye week before we play them: Denver (we have the same bye week) and Detroit (before our home game at Lambeau).

I'm expecting the team to be hungry and get out to a faster start than typical with MM.

Barring AR injury, should be a SB win.

Fan Shout
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
17h / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.