Zero2Cool
9 years ago

Read what I said more carefully.

I never said that Ted didn't take risks. I didn't even say he didn't take big risks. What I said was that he doesn't take big risks when it comes to veteran free agents. Not like Wolf did.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



What risks did Ron Wolf take? I'm having brain farts here. Reggie White, while Wolf had nothing to lose because the Packers were garbage for two or so decades prior. So you take a big swing. Keith Jackson trade, but Reggie gave assurance to Wolf that he could get Jackson to suit up.

Desmond Howard was not a risk. He was on his last hope and when he ran back a punt against I believe the Steelers, that locked down #22 for the roster. Maybe I'm not understanding what the definition of risk is. [Hey, uffa dafa(sp?), know a movie I can watch to help me out?]

The more I look into the details of Wolf and Ted Thompson, the more I think Thompson is equal if not more riskier than Wolf.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
9 years ago

Without Reggie, Brett ends his career with no SB appearances. Thank GOD our GM at the time realized we needed to go for it with our special QB. Thank GOD he could actually build a defense. Had he just hoped for a comp pick who might be good 3 years later our Favre years would've ended with no SB appearances. Thank GOD Ted Thompson was NOT our GM during a huge chunk of the Favre years. He would've completely wasted him...thankfully, for TT, Aaron is better than Brett and is able to overcome his lack of going for it almost singlehandedly.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Did you actually read my post or did you just think, "hey, someone said something, better have yet another piss and a moan about Ted Thompson"?

I said I don't think there's been another free agent with White's pedigree. Clearly, that would indicate I'm happy Wolf made the move.

The rest was simply a statement that free agent players carry some risk with them. So do draft picks. So what does that have to do with Ted Thompson?
Born and bred a cheesehead
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Did you actually read my post or did you just think, "hey, someone said something, better have yet another piss and a moan about Ted Thompson"?

I said I don't think there's been another free agent with White's pedigree. Clearly, that would indicate I'm happy Wolf made the move.

The rest was simply a statement that free agent players carry some risk with them. So do draft picks. So what does that have to do with Ted Thompson?

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 



Both. :signarg:

I'm simply comparing approaches. Reggie white was a monumental signing. Biggest of the big...sent waves through the NFL that little Green Bay was serious about winning a Super Bowl. Now, think over the 10 years and tell me one single time Ted Thompson made a move even near similar. Some will think Woodson or Peppers is similar but neither is remotely close to what Ron did with Reggie. That is one of the big reasons I don't like Ted Thompson all that much. He doesn't try to maximize what he has RIGHT NOW...he operates with 5 years in mind first. I understand having a vision for the future but to miss what is happening right now worried about 5 years from now is foolish. Spend your time thinking of how to get the Packers to the post game podium ceremony at the SuperBowl...not what some 4th round comp pick might mean to you in 3 years. Sure, the latter is important, just Ted Thompson prioritizes things incorrectly. He wants a competitive team...not a dominant one. Just a completely different mindset from RW and what I think is proper. It appears we have a large segment of fans here who are worried more about 5 years from now than they are how the Packers are going to do this season and you are the Ted Thompson fans.

EDIT: Ted Thompson does risk as much as RW but in the sense of being stupid relying on young guys to fill voids that he could fill by using FA. He hopes a guy will develop vs. Ron who saw a hole and filled it. Ted Thompson loves rolling into seasons with tons of question marks. Makes him look smarter if it works out.

It is hilarious to me that we have a JSO piece linked on the front page about TT's draft day trades. Curiously, that wasn't created as a topic with another tireless line about how great Ted Thompson is from a poster, here. Why was that not done? If you look at his draft day trades...pretty abysmal...really abysmal, actually. Of course, Clay Matthews! Clay Matthews! Go look at the rest. I love that he got DJ Williams at TE instead of Julius Thomas. It fits right in with NOBODY deciding to actually grade each Ted Thompson draft individually. That wasn't done because your contention that he was a stellar drafter goes up in smoke by the weight of evidence against that crazy statement. Those who look at him and study him objectively know he's not anywhere near worthy of the accolades he receives.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DoddPower
9 years ago

Both. :signarg:

I'm simply comparing approaches. Reggie white was a monumental signing. Biggest of the big...sent waves through the NFL that little Green Bay was serious about winning a Super Bowl. Now, think over the 10 years and tell me one single time Ted Thompson made a move even near similar. Some will think Woodson or Peppers is similar but neither is remotely close to what Ron did with Reggie. That is one of the big reasons I don't like Ted Thompson all that much. He doesn't try to maximize what he has RIGHT NOW...he operates with 5 years in mind first. I understand having a vision for the future but to miss what is happening right now worried about 5 years from now is foolish. Spend your time thinking of how to get the Packers to the post game podium ceremony at the SuperBowl...not what some 4th round comp pick might mean to you in 3 years. Sure, the latter is important, just Ted Thompson prioritizes things incorrectly. He wants a competitive team...not a dominant one. Just a completely different mindset from RW and what I think is proper. It appears we have a large segment of fans here who are worried more about 5 years from now than they are how the Packers are going to do this season and you are the Ted Thompson fans.

EDIT: Ted Thompson does risk as much as RW but in the sense of being stupid relying on young guys to fill voids that he could fill by using FA. He hopes a guy will develop vs. Ron who saw a hole and filled it. Ted Thompson loves rolling into seasons with tons of question marks. Makes him look smarter if it works out.

It is hilarious to me that we have a JSO piece linked on the front page about TT's draft day trades. Curiously, that wasn't created as a topic with another tireless line about how great Ted Thompson is from a poster, here. Why was that not done? If you look at his draft day trades...pretty abysmal...really abysmal, actually. Of course, Clay Matthews! Clay Matthews! Go look at the rest. I love that he got DJ Williams at TE instead of Julius Thomas. It fits right in with NOBODY deciding to actually grade each Ted Thompson draft individually. That wasn't done because your contention that he was a stellar drafter goes up in smoke by the weight of evidence against that crazy statement. Those who look at him and study him objectively know he's not anywhere near worthy of the accolades he receives.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Ted Thompson's approach is fine. He doesn't need to rely on outside free agents anymore than he already does. Not at all. All he has to do is draft better. It's that simple, although obviously drafting better is far from easy or simple. If Ted Thompson would have hit on a few more draft picks, recent Packers teams could have been totally different. One or two good players can make all the difference in the world. I think Ted Thompson can find another couple of players in this draft and along with the development of other young players, I expect the Packers to be as good as they were (which I think was good enough to win the Super Bowl), or better. Just having Aaron Rodgers more healthy in the playoffs makes the Packers better.

From my perspective, relying almost exclusively on the draft is a MUCH bigger risk than signing outside free agents. Any general manager can throw lots of money at a big-name player. The negative ramifications of that are usually two years down the road, or more and additional players can always be brought in. Finding star players in the draft is incredibly difficult when picking late in every round.

As Wade said, obviously Ted doesn't take many risks in free agency, but he does take some risks in that regard, and he takes massive risks with his reliance on the draft. It takes balls of steel or ignorance to do that. Ted Thompson is clearly confident in his ability, and for good reason. He's pretty damn good at it. If he can snag a couple more very good players in this upcoming draft that can contribute this year, I expect the Packers to win the Super Bowl this season or next, pending health (as always).
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Ted Thompson's approach is fine. He doesn't need to rely on outside free agents anymore than he already does. Not at all. All he has to do is draft better. It's that simple, although obviously drafting better is far from easy or simple. If Ted Thompson would have hit on a few more draft picks, recent Packers teams could have been totally different. One or two good players can make all the difference in the world. I think Ted Thompson can find another couple of players in this draft and along with the development of other young players, I expect the Packers to be as good as they were (which I think was good enough to win the Super Bowl), or better. Just having Aaron Rodgers more healthy in the playoffs makes the Packers better.

From my perspective, relying almost exclusively on the draft is a MUCH bigger risk than signing outside free agents. Any general manager can throw lots of money at a big-name player. The negative ramifications of that are usually two years down the road, or more and additional players can always be brought in. Finding star players in the draft is incredibly difficult when picking late in every round.

As Wade said, obviously Ted doesn't take many risks in free agency, but he does take some risks in that regard, and he takes massive risks with his reliance on the draft. It takes balls of steel or ignorance to do that. Ted Thompson is clearly confident in his ability, and for good reason. He's pretty damn good at it. If he can snag a couple more very good players in this upcoming draft that can contribute this year, I expect the Packers to win the Super Bowl this season or next, pending health (as always).

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I was about to hit the "applaud" button until I got halfway through your final paragraph.

He is not good nor is he d*mn good... why is our defense not good after years of picks and even a FA dumped into it? He's NOT a good drafter. He's good at finding WR talent. That's about the extent of it. Recently, he's hit on some OL which has been helpful as he'd been terrible at finding them for years. When you can't draft difference makers on D you need to go get them. Ron knew that and did...TT knows that and doesn't.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Zero2Cool
9 years ago
Somehow Dom Capers gets a free pass after how many first round flops?
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Somehow Dom Capers gets a free pass after how many first round flops?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Why is Dom still here? Ted Thompson decided to extend Mike McCarthy knowing Dom was his guy. That falls on the GM and nobody else.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Bigbyfan
9 years ago

Why is Dom still here? Ted Thompson decided to extend Mike McCarthy knowing Dom was his guy. That falls on the GM and nobody else.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Using that logic, this must all be Mark Murphy's fault. He gave Thompson an extension, who gave McCarthy an extension knowing Dom is his guy. Must be Murphy's fault and nobody else.

Your stubbornness when it comes to blaming Thompson for everything is amazing.
blank
nerdmann
9 years ago

Both. :signarg:

I'm simply comparing approaches. Reggie white was a monumental signing. Biggest of the big...sent waves through the NFL that little Green Bay was serious about winning a Super Bowl. Now, think over the 10 years and tell me one single time Ted Thompson made a move even near similar. Some will think Woodson or Peppers is similar but neither is remotely close to what Ron did with Reggie. That is one of the big reasons I don't like Ted Thompson all that much. He doesn't try to maximize what he has RIGHT NOW...he operates with 5 years in mind first. I understand having a vision for the future but to miss what is happening right now worried about 5 years from now is foolish. Spend your time thinking of how to get the Packers to the post game podium ceremony at the SuperBowl...not what some 4th round comp pick might mean to you in 3 years. Sure, the latter is important, just Ted Thompson prioritizes things incorrectly. He wants a competitive team...not a dominant one. Just a completely different mindset from RW and what I think is proper. It appears we have a large segment of fans here who are worried more about 5 years from now than they are how the Packers are going to do this season and you are the Ted Thompson fans.

EDIT: Ted Thompson does risk as much as RW but in the sense of being stupid relying on young guys to fill voids that he could fill by using FA. He hopes a guy will develop vs. Ron who saw a hole and filled it. Ted Thompson loves rolling into seasons with tons of question marks. Makes him look smarter if it works out.

It is hilarious to me that we have a JSO piece linked on the front page about TT's draft day trades. Curiously, that wasn't created as a topic with another tireless line about how great Ted Thompson is from a poster, here. Why was that not done? If you look at his draft day trades...pretty abysmal...really abysmal, actually. Of course, Clay Matthews! Clay Matthews! Go look at the rest. I love that he got DJ Williams at TE instead of Julius Thomas. It fits right in with NOBODY deciding to actually grade each Ted Thompson draft individually. That wasn't done because your contention that he was a stellar drafter goes up in smoke by the weight of evidence against that crazy statement. Those who look at him and study him objectively know he's not anywhere near worthy of the accolades he receives.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Ron Wolf HAD to be bold in pursuit of REggie White. Given the over all decades long culture of losing, combined with the weather and what happened to James Lofton, NO black players in the league wanted to come to Green Bay, if they didn't have to.

Wolf knew he had to change that. It wasn't just about "boldly" going after players.

Ted didn't have that challenge. His challenge was taking the team back from the QB who thought it was his place to run the franchise.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Using that logic, this must all be Mark Murphy's fault. He gave Thompson an extension, who gave McCarthy an extension knowing Dom is his guy. Must be Murphy's fault and nobody else.

Your stubbornness when it comes to blaming Thompson for everything is amazing.

Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



You took this a bit too far. Murphy should've moved on from Ted Thompson and our new GM should've moved on from MM.

However, since Ted Thompson was retained it was HIS call to extend MM. He chose to do so knowing Dom was his D. coord and all the failures on that side of the ball over the years. If Ted Thompson had such an issue with our ineffective defense, he could've brought in a new coaching staff. He didn't.

Your ability to NEVER blame Ted Thompson for ANYTHING amazes me.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (8h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (14h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (14h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (14h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (14h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (14h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (14h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (14h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (16h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (16h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (16h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (16h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (17h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (17h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (18h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (21h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (21h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.