beast
9 years ago

Aaron Kampman, Spencer Havner, how many of these marginally talented white guys have we gone through? And the crowd loves 'em every time.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Are you suggesting that if they're white, they must be marginally talented? Because Kampman wasn't marginal, but maybe you just enjoy trolling ... but Kampman played the run very well and in the process for 37 sacks in 3 years... and might of been better over a longer period if the Packers had better defensive players around him during the Sherman years.

Fans also liked William Henderson, Bubba Franks, Donald Lee, Corey Williams, Aaron Rouse, Will Blackmon, Davon House, marginal black players...

Fans like certain players ... hell for a while there seemed to be a push by fans to bench Nick Collins for Aaron Rouse... because Rouse could catch an INT (after giving up a TD) ... where Collins at the time seemed like knock a ton of balls down but couldn't catch a pass throw to him it seemed like early on in his career.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
9 years ago

Race is not an issue.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



That's what white right wingers always say, but it couldn't be farther from truth.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
9 years ago

Looks like you set up a fake argument for you to complain about... I never said Kuhn is a bone-crusher (because he's not), or a fast RB (because he's not), or that he's Packers People (though he probably is, that also is irrelevant to the subject)

Packers seem to bring in another FB every single year, and even drafted two, Korey Hall and Quinn Johnson... and some how Kuhn gets up on the final 53 man roster and the other guy sooner or later disappears.

They've had other FBs that better fit want you seemed to suggested you wanted and they got cut. Which might mean the Packers are looking for something other than just bone-crushing blocks and speed... like maybe the best overall versatile that is a 10/jack of most/all trades that gives them the best chance to win... maybe that's why they have kept Kuhn around this long. Nothing to do with Packers people or not.

But like I think you suggested, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Packers using more TE/H-back sets where a TE is in the back field, nor surprised about a TE or two drafted.

Originally Posted by: beast 



OK Pot! You should see yourself set up arguments with Uffda!

And actually I just forgot to mention the bone-crushing blocking in my first post.

Also, we don't spend any valuable picks trying to get a top notch fullback. We use our garbage picks or street free agents for some competition for Kuhn. Are we really trying all we can do to run the football?
UserPostedImage
beast
9 years ago

And actually I just forgot to mention the bone-crushing blocking in my first post.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 


Even if you did, that still would of gone into the Quinn Johnson got cut argument.

Also, we don't spend any valuable picks trying to get a top notch fullback. We use our garbage picks or street free agents for some competition for Kuhn. Are we really trying all we can do to run the football?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I'm very confused now... are you suggesting the Packers use a "valuable" draft pick to pick up a "top notch" player at a position you claimed is "a position that has become irrelevent in the modern day NFL"?

If it's irrelevant (like you claim) then why would you a valuable draft pick on it? Doesn't make sense to me... sounds like Al Davis talking about using 1st round picks on kickers because they're the best at their position.

Also what's a "valuable" draft pick?, just wondering where the line is between valuable draft pick and garbage draft pick.


And to answer your question... are we do everything we can do to run the ball? ... No, the Packers are a pass first offensively minded team, and rarely if ever to pass first offensively teams ever do everything they can to run the ball. Just like a lot of running teams don't do everything they can for the pass the ball.


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
9 years ago

That's what white right wingers always say, but it couldn't be farther from truth.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



I guess I can't presume to speak for others but I don't even know what color players are. It is not just football. I don't pay attention to baseball players either.

That's not to say after a few years I don't learn what their skin color is. It just doesn't matter to me. As far as I am concerned ALL Packers are green.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
9 years ago

Even if you did, that still would of gone into the Quinn Johnson got cut argument.



I'm very confused now... are you suggesting the Packers use a "valuable" draft pick to pick up a "top notch" player at a position you claimed is "a position that has become irrelevent in the modern day NFL"?

If it's irrelevant (like you claim) then why would you a valuable draft pick on it? Doesn't make sense to me... sounds like Al Davis talking about using 1st round picks on kickers because they're the best at their position.

Also what's a "valuable" draft pick?, just wondering where the line is between valuable draft pick and garbage draft pick.


And to answer your question... are we do everything we can do to run the ball? ... No, the Packers are a pass first offensively minded team, and rarely if ever to pass first offensively teams ever do everything they can to run the ball. Just like a lot of running teams don't do everything they can for the pass the ball.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I don't know what is so difficult to understand. We should get a bonecrushing blocking fullback for Lacy even though the FB position has become irrelevant in the NFL. That's not too difficult for you is it? Just because other teams don't use the FB anymore do the Packers have to conform?

I'm not going to talk to you like you're a 4 year old like I do others in this forum. Keep up!
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

I don't know what is so difficult to understand. We should get a bonecrushing blocking fullback for Lacy even though the FB position has become irrelevant in the NFL. That's not too difficult for you is it? Just because other teams don't use the FB anymore do the Packers have to conform?

I'm not going to talk to you like you're a 4 year old like I do others in this forum. Keep up!

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Lacy could have been our FB, if Johnathan Franklin hadn't ended his career early. LOL. I'm still not over that.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago
Love the off season...
Nerd rips every player and coach like they have somehow personally offended him.

Dakotat turns every thread iinto a political debate.

The laughs just keep on coming.

How many weeks until the draft?

That ought to be interesting.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
beast
9 years ago

I don't know what is so difficult to understand. We should get a bonecrushing blocking fullback for Lacy even though the FB position has become irrelevant in the NFL. That's not too difficult for you is it? Just because other teams don't use the FB anymore do the Packers have to conform?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 


No that statement made a lot more sense, than the other statements. Sounds like you wanted Quinn Johnson, a top bone crushing blocking FB, that was drafted with a valuable draft pick.

Damn those coaches for keeping the best 53 they thought could help win the most games for them! And not keeping the bone crushing FB...

More serious those... how many bone crushing FBs are there, that can keep making a good teams 53 man roster? Very few... that's why so few teams have a true very good bone crushing FB ... because most of them no longer exists... (for the most part )
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
9 years ago

No that statement made a lot more sense, than the other statements. Sounds like you wanted Quinn Johnson, a top bone crushing blocking FB, that was drafted with a valuable draft pick.

Damn those coaches for keeping the best 53 they thought could help win the most games for them! And not keeping the bone crushing FB...

More serious those... how many bone crushing FBs are there, that can keep making a good teams 53 man roster? Very few... that's why so few teams have a true very good bone crushing FB ... because most of them no longer exists... (for the most part )

Originally Posted by: beast 



Should've kept Vonta Leach.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Bears are sending RB Khalil Herbert to the Bengals, per sources.
Zero2Cool (2h) : ZaDarius Smith continues his "north" tour.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Let the Chiefs trade a 5th for him
Zero2Cool (2h) : Nearing 30, large contract, nope.
Martha Careful (15h) : any interest in Marshon Lattimore?
Zero2Cool (17h) : What does NFL do if they're over cap?
Mucky Tundra (17h) : They've been able to constantly push it out through extensions, void years etc but they're in the hole by 72 million next year I believe
hardrocker950 (18h) : Seems the Saints are always in cap hell
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Saints HC job is not an envious one; gonna be in cap hell for 3 years
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Dennis Allen has now been fired twice mid-season with Derek Carr as his starting QB
Zero2Cool (19h) : Kuhn let go
beast (21h) : I wonder if the Packers would have any interest in Z. Smith, probably not
Zero2Cool (21h) : Shefter says Browns and Lions will figure out how to get a deal done for Za'Darius Smith..
Zero2Cool (4-Nov) : Packers are more likely to have 1,000 yard rusher than 4,000 yard passer
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : It's raining hard.
Zero2Cool (3-Nov) : Packers inactives vs. Lions: CB Jaire Alexander S Evan Williams C Josh Myers Non-injury inactives: WR Malik Heath OL Travis Glover DE Bren
packerfanoutwest (3-Nov) : Malik Willis: My focus is helping the Packers win, not proving I can start elsewhere. But he could
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : I had Texans, but the loss of another WR flipped me
wpr (1-Nov) : I thought about taking the Jets but they've been a disaster. Losing to the Pats last week
Zero2Cool (1-Nov) : Surprised more didn't pick Jets in Pick'em.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

2h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Derek

5h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-Nov / Around The NFL / wpr

1-Nov / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Nov / Around The NFL / beast

31-Oct / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.