SUPER BOWL 49· Page 3 · PACKERSHOME

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

I hated McCarthy for his play calls that ended my Packers season, but man when you throw on the 1 yard line with the best punishing running back in the league you are a dumbass.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

Mike McCarty is/was a gutless moron for 2 weeks for running in the 4th q...now a coach gets aggressive and, um...

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#22

Mike McCarty is/was a gutless moron for 2 weeks for running in the 4th q...now a coach gets aggressive and, um...

Originally Posted by: musccy

Grasping...if you think this is the same I am scared. They were losing and we were winning. They needed to place their ball in the hands of their best player and didn't and guess what so did we.

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#23

it's not an apples to apples comparrison, I admit that. However, the Packers had a back averaging 4+ ypc going through much of the 4th and a hefty lead. Mike calls some runs and for weeks we read what a pussy he is. Carroll calls a pass and he's an idiot...actually a "moron" in the other thread. leading up to that, Mike didn't call Lacy's # enough at Detroit or in the 4th q. much of this season.

There is a revolving door of complaints on these boards based on whether a play worked or not, NOT based on any consistency in philosophies.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#24

We average a 4 YPC without a stacked box, we averaged a 0 afterwards. Rodgers is the MVP, and guess what he can make a few throws if needed. Instead of waiting until 3rd down to run a pass play why not hurt them early. 2wks later and the pain has not gone away. We could've won this year and I am sorry if I think we let upper management know that we pissed one away.

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#25

Trust me, i'm as pissed as anyone the team wasn't playing today.

you'll see stacked boxes a lot and stout defenses a lot, esp. @ Detroit and 4th q drives which fans have been clammoring for the ability to close out a game with sustained drives for at least 3 years now.

Mike relied on one of the top 5 backs, a line he trusted and a 12 point lead. Almost unanimously people begged for a pass. Comparable albeit certainly not identical scenario, and the same fans are calling a pick/slant a moronic play.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#26

Originally Posted by: musccy

The problem is the pick/slant is a moronic play on the NE defense. You are giving the NE defense the same latitude as the Seahawks which is frankly false.

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#27

Why is it a moronic play? If wilson throws it a little more inside, the dB doesn't have a play on the ball sans penalty.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

9 years ago

#28

I thought Seattle had it won. Hand off to Lynch, they are back to back champs.
That throw, man, if I was a Seattle fan, I would be SO ticked off!
Glad I'm not!!!
The look on Richard Sherman's face at the time of the INT.......PRICELESS!!!LOL!

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#29

Why is it a moronic play? If wilson throws it a little more inside, the dB doesn't have a play on the ball sans penalty.

Originally Posted by: musccy

It's a moronic play because you are giving their run defense way more credit than they deserve and the timeclock did not dictate pass.

musccy
Veteran Member

9 years ago

#30

There were 30 seconds left. Call a play you think will work. Wilson doesn't throw a pick and they still have downs and time and nobody is saying boo...it may have been a setup to soften the d on the next play for a draw or back to lynch.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (5m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (7m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (18m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS