Moronic Seahawk Play Calling· Page 2

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

If jordy is the best wr do you never pass to cobb? This aaron is our best player argument is an oversimplified "either / or" scenario that doesn't exist.

You want a 4th q pass? What happened on 3rd and 4 to quarless?

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#12

Throwing to Quarless is not a defense of our game plan as he is not a safe target. Throwing on a 3rd down when the defense knows you are going to throw is not a rational response. To me this even hurt more and I just wished they would have ran on the play because it made no difference.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

He's not a safe target?!? Mike doesn't just call the "throw it to andrew" play...there are reads to progress through.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: musccy

3rd and 4 to Quarless was a passing into known coverage. Pass on 1st down or 2nd and guess what Lacy becomes a weapon again.

Quarless is a bottom ranked TE and should never be our dependable hands TE. A failure of our organization beyond the game IMO.

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#14

I'll write a letter to Ted this offseason and make sure he knows to have a 53 All Pros on the team. Do you think Quarless was the only option Rodgers was instructed to throw to?

porky88
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#15

You can't compare this game to the NFC Championship. So much was different. Two different games, two different settings, and two different game plans. It doesn't make any sense to compare the two.

New England played to their strength (Tom Brady) instead of worrying about what Seattle does. Brady is their best player and they put the ball in his hand. He wasn't flawless. He made missed some throws, but he rose to the occasion. His two fourth-quarter TD drives was a privileged to watch. Good stuff. Good football.

Regarding the call, sometimes a bad call is a bad call. Marshawn Lynch is the best red zone back in football. Feed him the rock in that situation. Seattle got too cute. That was the difference in the end. Pete Carroll was worrying about what New England would do. Bill Belichick was playing to his team's strength.

http://www.row12.com/

IronMan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#16

Mike runs in the 4th...he's a wuss. Carroll passes in the 4th, he's a moron. Sure glad I'm not an NFL HC...damned if you do, damned if you dont.

Originally Posted by: musccy

Two completely different situations. Lynch should have got the ball on 2nd, 3rd, and 4th down if necessary.

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

10 years ago

#17

If Seattle is gonna throw the ball, why not say a play action pass like the TD they scored earlier? Why not a roll out or a boot leg to take advantage of Wilsons mobility? The guy who called the play is essentially throwing his WR under the bus (even though he put him in the spot) by saying he should have fought for it more. The WR on the play Lockette is an UDFA/Practice Squad fodder who only has a whopping 18 career receptions in the regular season. Seattle players openly wonder why the play was called. It all points to the same thing: they got away from their identity at the critical moment and that's why in the end it's a terrible play call.

(and an amazing play by Malcolm Butler)

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#18

Wasnt this message board furious with 4th quarter runs with a bruising back in the 4th quarter just 2 weeks ago. Now someone passes and...???

Originally Posted by: musccy

Shhhhh!! Players and Teams do not make good plays!! It's always the other team who is moronic, idiotic and/or stupid!!! Shhhhhh!!!

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#19

I don't really disagree with the play call itself. It was a well designed play, that the defender made not just a good play, but an outstanding play against. Wilson was a little late with the ball also. That play results in a completion and TD or at worst an incompletion probably 99% of the time.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#20

Wasnt this message board furious with 4th quarter runs with a bruising back in the 4th quarter just 2 weeks ago. Now someone passes and...???

Originally Posted by: musccy

First we do not have the run game of Seattle. And no, I wasn't furious that the ran the ball. I was upset because of the way they ran the ball and didn't even try to get the one first down that would have sealed the game.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

dfosterf (3h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (3h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (3h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (10h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (12h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (12h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (12h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (14h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24