Zero he had a good season i admit it just made me mad that a guy will write a story but not use all the facts thats why i laughed at the story
"TheEngineer" wrote:
You make it sound as though the writer is wrong. The difference between what you wrote and what he wrote is that, although those statistics are from the 4th quarter, the context within the 4th quarter the stats are from, are different. i.e., last 5 minutes, whole quarter, down by 7, etc. I don't agree that Rodgers has been as great as the article makes him out to be in the 4th quarter, but Rodgers does do a lot of other things well, like his redzone rating, 3rd down rating, etc.
"dhazer" wrote: