DoddPower
10 years ago

When Aaron Rodgers lines up to play linebacker, maybe I'll reconsider my thoughts this year.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



This makes no sense to me. Aaron Rodgers doesn't need to play any other position because he's the best at the most important position in the game. Frankly JJ Watt scoring a few touchdowns on offense on a shitty team really doesn't mean much to me (but his defensive TDs are impressive). I care more about a player that scores 30+ touchdowns, accounts for over 4,000 yards of offense, leads one of the best offenses in the league, a division title, the #2 seed, and a first round bye. Those are the things that really matter. JJ Watts individual accomplishments are great, but an MVP should make an entire team great (or at least an entire side of the ball), and Aaron Rodgers does just that.

I also don't look to fantasy football for any inclination on who the most valuable player in the league is.

It's a valid debate and it's not a land-slide either way. But it today's NFL, Aaron Rodgers is simply much more valuable than JJ Watt.
Porforis
10 years ago

Most Valuable means to me you would trade them for nobody. Houston would trade Watt for Rodgers and Andrew Luck in a heartbeat I am positive. Does it suck that it means this is a QB award? Yes. I like how the CFL handles this award as it uses the term "Most Outstanding Player", which although still means the QB wins it the majority of the time, it leaves room for others.

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



I initially agreed with your definition but then I got to considering - What if Manning had Rodgers' year, and you had the possibility to trade him for Luck or Russell Wilson? Wouldn't trading for youth be a huge benefit versus someone very close to the end of his career? Trades like that aren't about who's going to do the best for your team RIGHT NOW. MVP awards are about who's the best THIS YEAR.
sschind
10 years ago

Aaron Rodgers is the MVP if we like it or not. That recent game against the bills has made us forget how incredible Rodgers has been this season. The reason I say that we might not like Rodgers for MVP is that I understand that the odds are against the Mvps when it comes to superbowls (that was for you zero I caught on to your plan [grin1] ).

Originally Posted by: cheeseheads123 



Everyone keeps saying what an incredible year Rodgers is having and while I agree it is incredible I don't see it being THAT much better than several other QBs. Romo has a higher QB rating (not that QB rating is the be all and end all) 8 QBs have a higher completion percentage, 6 have more yards, Romo has a higher yards per attempt, and 2 have more TDs. The one stat that stands out to me and is truly incredible is he TD/INT ratio. Especially when you consider 4 of his 5 picks came off tipped balls.

Some will say that Rodgers probably sat the equivalent of a full game or more due to huge leads and if he would have played for those entire games his stats would be much higher but consider this. Matt Flynn only threw 18 passes in all that mop up time (completed 8 for 66 yards) Unless you assume McCarthy would have had Rodgers heaving up pass after pass had he still been in the game you can't assume that Rodgers' numbers would have been that much higher than they already are.

Having said this I am not trying to make it sound like stats should be the determining factor for MVP. This has nothing to do with how valuable he is to the team, just that what Rodgers is doing is not that special for QBs anymore.
beast
10 years ago

he's SCORED MORE touchdowns than both LeSean McCoy and Calvin Johnson -- two very dynamic players who are both considered first round draft choices in Fantasy Football.

Not to mention the fantasy leagues I was a part of that included IDP players had championship rosters with Watt in them.

Imagine... people losing sleep playing Fantasy Football because of a DEFENSIVE PLAYER?

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



Completely lost me with the fantasy argument... a real football thing shouldn't be given out becuase of fansty football... fansty football should have zero impact on the real MVP award.

As formthe 3-4 arguement I haven't watched to see their new scheme defense this year but their old scheme was a 3-4 line-up that played like a 4-3 scheme normally would... and not what I would call atrue 3-4 (again that was the old scheme but some thought they might be sticking with a scheme like that with them drafling a 4-3 DE so high to play 3-4 old and really have him play a stand-up 4-3 like role)
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
10 years ago

As formthe 3-4 arguement I haven't watched to see their new scheme defense this year but their old scheme was a 3-4 line-up that played like a 4-3 scheme normally would... and not what I would call atrue 3-4 (again that was the old scheme but some thought they might be sticking with a scheme like that with them drafling a 4-3 DE so high to play 3-4 old and really have him play a stand-up 4-3 like role)

Originally Posted by: beast 



Moreover, doesn't Watt play inside often in passing situations anyway? I'm not trying to minimize his accomplishments at all. But I think he's more of a DT in passing situations. Really, he's just a hybrid player, period, so applying any positional label to him can be a little misleading.

buckeyepackfan
10 years ago
Good arguments from both sides here.

I was wondering if any Defensive player had ever won the MVP award?

Went back and checked and the answer is no.

Watt will get DPOY, Aaron most likely will be MVP, but I wouldn't be surprised if he shares the award this year.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Rockmolder
10 years ago

Good arguments from both sides here.

I was wondering if any Defensive player had ever won the MVP award?

Went back and checked and the answer is no.

Watt will get DPOY, Aaron most likely will be MVP, but I wouldn't be surprised if he shares the award this year.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Alan Page and LT won it. PK Moseley even won it once, but I'm not counting that one, with the strike shortened season and all the weird things that brought us.

I'm still not sure who will win it. On one side, looking back at that 1986 MVP award which LT won, JJ Watt is on par with his career. It certainly wouldn't surprise me if he won it. There's no player as dominant on defense as Watt is right now.

On the other side, LT didn't have a QB going up against him who deserved it as much as Rodgers does now. Marino was the only one, looking at it from a pure performance stand point, but his team went 8-8 and, while he threw for the most yards and TDs by far, he also tossed the 2nd most interceptions.

I guess they had that same discussion as we're having now, though, but regarding Dickerson and LT. We'll see who will win it. It's 50/50 in my eyes.
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
If you are going by numbers, Romo has Rodgers beat for having a better quarterback season.

Oh, you say Romo is more efficient only because of his running back who racked up 1,800 yards rushing with 13 touchdowns?

What about Rodgers running back who had over 1,100 yards rushing and scored 13 touchdowns as well? What about the two receivers who caught over 90 passes with over 1,200 yards and each caught at least 12 touchdowns?


No, I do not want a Cowboys player to get any award over a Packers player, but when if are objective, --- which these awards are NOT (which is the point of this whole thread-thanks for noticing) --- Romo has actually been the most efficient QB this regular season. However, in my opinion, J.J. Watt is the most deserving of the Most Valuable Player award at a position the NFL deems (predicating that by the rules) is not that valuable.


Yes, Aaron Rodgers will win it.
Yes, Romo has had the better season statistically.
Yes, Watt is whom has most earned the award.


Romo will not win it because of his past failures, and that is wrong. Watt will not win it because everyone and their unborn grandchildren know QB is head and shoulders the most important position in the NFL, regardless of his insanely great season.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
10 years ago

If you are going by numbers, Romo has Rodgers beat for having a better quarterback season.

Oh, you say Romo is more efficient only because of his running back who racked up 1,800 yards rushing with 13 touchdowns?

What about Rodgers running back who had over 1,100 yards rushing and scored 13 touchdowns as well? What about the two receivers who caught over 90 passes with over 1,200 yards and each caught at least 12 touchdowns?


No, I do not want a Cowboys player to get any award over a Packers player, but when if are objective, --- which these awards are NOT (which is the point of this whole thread-thanks for noticing) --- Romo has actually been the most efficient QB this regular season. However, in my opinion, J.J. Watt is the most deserving of the Most Valuable Player award at a position the NFL deems (predicating that by the rules) is not that valuable.


Yes, Aaron Rodgers will win it.
Yes, Romo has had the better season statistically.
Yes, Watt is whom has most earned the award.


Romo will not win it because of his past failures, and that is wrong. Watt will not win it because everyone and their unborn grandchildren know QB is head and shoulders the most important position in the NFL, regardless of his insanely great season.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



You're really into this whole devil's advocate thing.

Romo will not not win it because of his past failures... Romo will not win it because he wasn't the best QB in the league.

I don't know what efficiency and a better season statistically is in your eyes. Rodgers had 4 more TDs and 4 less ints, while throwing for 800 more yards. The only thing Romo has on him is a 4% higher completion rate.

Murray running for 1800 yards is not really comparable to Lacy running for 1100. Also, you come up with our receivers, but fail to mention Dez Bryant. Or, the most important part, that freakish O-line Dallas has going.

Romo most likely has the best supporting cast in the league. There's not a truly bad part on that offense to be found. Mostly thanks to the O-line, but also because of Bryant, who's one of the best in the league, Murray who can obviously run it and his bff at TE, Witten.

I think I'd even put up Andrew Luck, before going to Romo.
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

You're really into this whole devil's advocate thing.

Romo will not not win it because of his past failures... Romo will not win it because he wasn't the best QB in the league.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



The award doesn't go to the best quarterback, it goes to the most valuable player of the season and that nearly always is a quarterback and the quarterback who has been the most efficient was Romo. This isn't rocket science. Wait, yes it is and I'm a rocket scientist!!! (looks at paystub, ...no ... no i am not).


Several times I've pointed out the bias, yet you folks seem to keep ignoring it, just validating how strong your bias truly is. Nothing wrong with that. As I have also said, if I'm told I can have any single player, I would without question take Aaron Rodgers over any other player and it has nothing to do with his stats this season or the prior season but rather his body of work throughout his career and because he wants to "Pump you up!".


That "freakish" OL? Oh, so cute you mention their OL but not the Packers? Again, BIAS. Face it. You do not want to be objective. And it is okay!! Goodness.


You'd put Andrew Luck over Romo, again, more bias seeping through! lol


You can only be shown the door, you have to choose to open it.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (45m) : That is fair by me.
    buckeyepackfan (46m) : Kenny Clark is the player, 2 1st rnd picks
    Zero2Cool (52m) : umm... what?
    wpr (1h) : I am stunned
    Mucky Tundra (1h) : RICKEY SCOOPS WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!
    Mucky Tundra (1h) : ITS HAPPENING
    buckeyepackfan (1h) : DEAL IS DONE
    buckeyepackfan (1h) : MICAH IS COMING TO GREEN BAY!!!!!!!!!
    wpr (7h) : Me do-ed it gooderly,
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Bahah, I was like WTF why isn't anyone posting on PP.com ... oops no one has permissions
    dfosterf (23h) : tell her I reckon
    dfosterf (23h) : Micah Robinson cut. Probable PS player tomorrow. Has to call mom back and t
    Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : New site so much better. Might make switch and deal with it.
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : Mecole Hardman to our practice squad
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : Nick Nieman from Texans our 5th linebacker. Special teams signing
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Looks like we signed Clayton Tune as QB3
    wpr (27-Aug) : TKT people lose their minds over QB3. Point is almost none of them are ready that's why they are on the PS and other teams don't take them.
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
    Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
    beast (27-Aug) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
    Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
    Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
    packerfanoutwest (27-Aug) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
    Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : what is Schefter saying?
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
    dfosterf (27-Aug) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
    Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
    Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
    Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
    Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
    dfosterf (26-Aug) : *Orzech*
    dfosterf (26-Aug) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
    Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
    Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
    wpr (26-Aug) : YES!!!!!!
    Mucky Tundra (26-Aug) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
    Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
    Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
    wpr (26-Aug) : He played pretty good.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

    14m / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    22h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    22h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

    26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

    23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.