nerdmann
10 years ago

I didn't think you would have the capacity to handle the response or know enough about football to know that Dallas would get crushed in Green Bay but probably beat us in Dallas. And we have no chance of beating Seattle in Seattle - it would be a repeat of game 1. Winning this week is very important.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



We can beat Seattle. We pissed that game away.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DakotaT
10 years ago

We can beat Seattle. We pissed that game away.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Not when the game is in Seattle, and they are locking that up right now. Maybe we will luck out and the Rams will do us a favor next week, but really doubtful. We really, really shit ourselves last week.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
10 years ago

yeah you can only say that after the Packers won. Game was in doubt the entire first half, not sure what game you were watching.

Originally Posted by: packerfanoutwest 



The game was never once in doubt from my perspective. That's why teams play four quarters. Games aren't decided after two quarters. I can truthfully say I never thought the Packers would lose this game. Of course it could have been a better win. It almost always can be. But it was still a good win, especially with a quarterback that wasn't 100% and on the road in a place the Packers have struggled recently. Now time to rest up and prepare for next week. Packers fans are such babies sometimes. The Packers defense was basically dominant this game and did exactly what they should do against an inferior team. And the offense was decent, too.
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Not when the game is in Seattle, and they are locking that up right now. Maybe we will luck out and the Rams will do us a favor next week, but really doubtful. We really, really shit ourselves last week.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



There ain't no way we win at Seattle. Saying the first game was close and we should've won? Delusional. Almost like saying Arizona should've beaten Seatlle tonight. Perhaps, Russell Wilson gets injured, or something, but outside of that ...no shot. Russ will run for 100+ on us. Rodgers will be scared out of his mind. We have no TE or legit 3rd WR to compete with their secondary. Lacy would have to run for 300 yards for us to win...I guess there's a chance that a lot of Packers fans love clinging to. A chance.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
10 years ago

There ain't no way we win at Seattle. Saying the first game was close and we should've won? Delusional. Almost like saying Arizona should've beaten Seatlle tonight. Perhaps, Russell Wilson gets injured, or something, but outside of that ...no shot. Russ will run for 100+ on us. Rodgers will be scared out of his mind. We have no TE or legit 3rd WR to compete with their secondary. Lacy would have to run for 300 yards for us to win...I guess there's a chance that a lot of Packers fans love clinging to. A chance.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Yeah, I don't see it happening either; let's just see if we can get that far. I'll be happy with beating Detroit next week, getting the second seed and then kicking Dallas' ass. Then we pray for a miracle because we are not as good a team as Seattle. Their DB's will control our receivers, they get pressure with the front four, and every defensive player hits like a Mack truck. That doesn't bode well for a finesse offense.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Yeah, I don't see it happening either; let's just see if we can get that far. I'll be happy with beating Detroit next week, getting the second seed and then kicking Dallas' ass. Then we pray for a miracle because we are not as good a team as Seattle. Their DB's will control our receivers, they get pressure with the front four, and every defensive player hits like a Mack truck. That doesn't bode well for a finesse offense.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Jordy's dropped pass... the defining moment of the 2014 season. Dallas hasn't lost on the road. That should be one heckuva game, if it happens. I thought 12-4 and one and done in playoffs heading into the season. Still, on track.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


blueleopard
10 years ago
At the beginning of the season, the Packers went in with the wrong gameplan, had their starting RT exit due to injury, and had virtually no identity on offense.

The Packers are a better team now than they were in September, and this team can beat anybody. Proof lies in the pudding with their win over New England, and it was a victory that was more than convincing. Will they win in Seattle? Nobody can gauge that, but Dallas proved they were beatable. With a depleted offensive line and no Percy Harvin, this Seattle team is very different. I do believe Russell Wilson has the intangibles to make up for the offense's lack of talent away from Beast Mode, but there's the key. The Packers simply have more playmakers than Seattle does.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
uffda udfa
10 years ago

At the beginning of the season, the Packers went in with the wrong gameplan, had their starting RT exit due to injury, and had virtually no identity on offense.

The Packers are a better team now than they were in September, and this team can beat anybody. Proof lies in the pudding with their win over New England, and it was a victory that was more than convincing. Will they win in Seattle? Nobody can gauge that, but Dallas proved they were beatable. With a depleted offensive line and no Percy Harvin, this Seattle team is very different. I do believe Russell Wilson has the intangibles to make up for the offense's lack of talent away from Beast Mode, but there's the key. The Packers simply have more playmakers than Seattle does.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



Seattle is a much better team than they were in September. It isn't just the Packers who had a chance to improve. New England barely eeked out a win at the Jets. Not exactly a road juggernaut this year...letting the Chiefs, yes, them, to score 41 on them.

Seattle has more defenders who can take away playmakers than Green Bay does. We have two legit options in the passing game...we need 3 or more to compete against their secondary. We couldn't run it at all there the first time. Why will it be different? This is the same kind of stuff that was said when getting ready to lose to the Niners again and again, and again. It's a bad matchup...realize that it is instead of going into fantasy mode talking about why it will be different. The Buffalo game and Jordy's drop has sent Packer nation into some crazy spin. Those are the world champs... walked into Arizona where they were 7-0 and left out of there with no questions to ask about who is the best in the NFC. The Packers played the Bills and Bucs in successive weeks and left all kinds of questions about their offense on the road. Do you not see that? One team is cranked up ready to defend a world championship with home field advantage and the other is sputtering. You can't wish that away no matter how much you love the Packers.

Marshawn and Russell are still there. We're going on the road and shutting them down? If you were a Seattle fan you would be ecstatic knowing Green Bay was coming to town.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


musccy
10 years ago

Yeah, I don't see it happening either; let's just see if we can get that far. I'll be happy with beating Detroit next week, getting the second seed and then kicking Dallas' ass. Then we pray for a miracle because we are not as good a team as Seattle. Their DB's will control our receivers, they get pressure with the front four, and every defensive player hits like a Mack truck. That doesn't bode well for a finesse offense.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Agreed. At this point, I think most feel/know it'll take something special to defeat Seattle. It's quite apparent that they're head and shoulders above the rest of the NFL now, even if they play on the road. For now, enjoy what's left, Sunday will be a festive atmosphere and a great game. I want to enjoy what I can with the rest of the season, not worry about what's not here yet.
nerdmann
10 years ago

At the beginning of the season, the Packers went in with the wrong gameplan, had their starting RT exit due to injury, and had virtually no identity on offense.

The Packers are a better team now than they were in September, and this team can beat anybody. Proof lies in the pudding with their win over New England, and it was a victory that was more than convincing. Will they win in Seattle? Nobody can gauge that, but Dallas proved they were beatable. With a depleted offensive line and no Percy Harvin, this Seattle team is very different. I do believe Russell Wilson has the intangibles to make up for the offense's lack of talent away from Beast Mode, but there's the key. The Packers simply have more playmakers than Seattle does.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



They don't scare me.

What scares me is Mike and Aaron playing scared, abandoning the run and shitting themselves. I'm also concerned that this team will go into an extended lull. Mike needs to hire a sports psychologist to get his team ready to play. So he knows how to get them mentally prepared.

However this team plays down to it's opponents level, and also up to it's oppenents level. We saw that against New England this year and when we went to Houston, was that last year or the year before?

Fuck the Seattle Seahawks.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
dfosterf (now) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (3m) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
packerfanoutwest (4m) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
beast (9m) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
beast (10m) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
beast (11m) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
beast (11m) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
dfosterf (44m) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
dfosterf (48m) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
dfosterf (50m) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
dfosterf (52m) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
beast (7h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.