Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Oh yeah forgot we should have drafted Cordarelle Patterson instead, dude is electric... haha

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



After last season, I was on the "damn Vikings" bandwagon for getting him. And now a former Packers 7th round pick is their best WR.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Oh yeah forgot we should have drafted Cordarelle Patterson instead, dude is electric... haha

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



Produce it.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


steveishere
10 years ago

Produce it.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Produce what? A quote?

"This is one of the biggest knocks on TT... the lack of sizzle players he drafts. It seems the Packers rarely take a guy in Round 1 who is a true game changer. Go back over decades of history and you rarely see it from Green bay, but you'll see it quite a bit from Minnesota.

It's tiring when you get the Vonnie Holiday's of the world while the rivals are getting the Randy Moss'.

Datone Jones vs. Cordarrelle Patterson (I realize Vikes had 3 cuts at it the 1st round and we had only one but we could've taken Patterson) "
Rockmolder
10 years ago

Hey Rock... Who cares about Seattle at Kansas City? Honestly. Who? Seattle is now going to host any and all comes in the playoffs, so you can talk about KC all day long... it isn't relevant because Seattle is a different team at home. Want to bring up Cowboys victory in Seattle?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



The Uffda's on Seattle's forum, when they gave the Cards more of a lead in the division?

The Cowboys are unbeaten on the road. For someone who puts that much into history and stats, that's one you handly ignore. (Or really, half of my last post)

If you honestly think THIS Packers team has a chance in Seattle...LMAO. Just LMAO. No shot...ZERO. NONE. It's beaten before it ever gets off the plane assuming it can even not go one and done which I wouldn't count on.



Convincing stuff.

Make excuses all day long...if you're a champion...you do not lose that game with what was riding. You just don't. Game reminded me of a game the Packers played vs. NYJ under Sherman that was basically the same thing.



So the Pats aren't a contender, then? They had a lot riding on that game against us. By your points, we suck. Therefore, the Pats must suck, as well.

You don't get what a pivotal loss that was do you? Just rely on the whole any given Sunday or we still have a chance type cliches? You're welcome to those ridiculous things. Reality is we blew it...just absolutely blew it and likely ended our season with yet another early playoff exit.



I do, but we're not down and out. We haven't even lost homefield advantage. Their schedule is tougher than ours is for the last two games. Even with Arizona's horrible QB situation, they're better than Tampa.

Don't count your chickens on that Tampa game...I'm not so sure we're winning down there.



Of course not. Luckely, you don't have to answer if they do. You're gone when we're playing good football.
uffda udfa
10 years ago

The Uffda's on Seattle's forum, when they gave the Cards more of a lead in the division?

The Cowboys are unbeaten on the road. For someone who puts that much into history and stats, that's one you handly ignore. (Or really, half of my last post)



Convincing stuff.



So the Pats aren't a contender, then? They had a lot riding on that game against us. By your points, we suck. Therefore, the Pats must suck, as well.



I do, but we're not down and out. We haven't even lost homefield advantage. Their schedule is tougher than ours is for the last two games. Even with Arizona's horrible QB situation, they're better than Tampa.



Of course not. Luckely, you don't have to answer if they do. You're gone when we're playing good football.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



Rock...are you stuck on the idea that Seattle may lose at Arizona on SNF? Pinning your hopes on that? I'm sorry but HFA is gone...out the window. It would take the miracle of miracles for us to have it throughout.

For you to even reference the Pats had to be tough for you to type. Did Brady play the worst game of his professional career in that game? Did Gronk drop a 94 yard TD pass? Did their ST's allow us to take one to the house? Those two games couldn't be more dissimilar in tenor and tone, but you've made them exactly the same to try and make a debate point? Missed the mark...badly.

I have to laugh at you saying I disappear when they're playing good football. I was here when they beat the Pats. I would argue the Packers haven't played good football...tell me, again, who have they beaten of any renown this year? Oh, New England,..right. Anyone else? Nope. Philly ain't good, Chicago ain't good, Minny ain't good, Carolina, NYJ, Atlanta?????...Miami is okay. Got drilled by Saints, Lions, Seahawks and Bills. Murderers row.

So, how impressive is this team...tell me? We've played good football? We've played bad teams and when we play a team with a very good defense we score 16, 13, and 7 points. LOL. Like a college team getting fat on cupcake that gets exposed when it plays a real team...that is Green Bay. Hey, though, we did beat New England, though...AT HOME, which is why it was beyond critical to get HFA throughout...did you not notice or have you missed that we've lost 4 games on the road this year and looked bad in all 4? Have you not noticed that we haven't lost at home?

So, rah, rah, rah all you'd like... losing yesterday puts a roadie to Seattle squarely into play. Yup, no big deal...it's all right in front of us...no way Aaron plays like that again...it's out of his system, right? Uh huh... no pattern... every single game on the road vs. a good D he folds...just folds...but Seattle at Seattle for the NFC Championship is going to be the trend breaker. Okay. Okay.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DakotaT
10 years ago
I love this place after a loss! It's like Christmas for the people that enjoy arguing. When Buckeye joins the party, it's really on!
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
10 years ago

I love this place after a loss! It's like Christmas for the people that enjoy arguing. When Buckeye joins the party, it's really on!

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Packers rattle off wins.. virtual silence. Packers lose one on the road to a good defense.. the rants are on.

Unfortunately... this has been the story of many a Packer fan, the lot of us spoiled fans.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Rockmolder
10 years ago

Rock...are you stuck on the idea that Seattle may lose at Arizona on SNF? Pinning your hopes on that? I'm sorry but HFA is gone...out the window. It would take the miracle of miracles for us to have it throughout.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I'm not. It's also very unlikely we lose against Tampa, but that seems like a rather valid point to you.

For you to even reference the Pats had to be tough for you to type. Did Brady play the worst game of his professional career in that game? Did Gronk drop a 94 yard TD pass? Did their ST's allow us to take one to the house? Those two games couldn't be more dissimilar in tenor and tone, but you've made them exactly the same to try and make a debate point? Missed the mark...badly.



You swing from one side to the other. My point is that we played well against, what many believe, is the best or second best team in the league. They had that game you just mentioned against the Chiefs. I reckon that's, in some way, not relevant, either.

I have to laugh at you saying I disappear when they're playing good football. I was here when they beat the Pats. I would argue the Packers haven't played good football...tell me, again, who have they beaten of any renown this year? Oh, New England,..right. Anyone else? Nope. Philly ain't good, Chicago ain't good, Minny ain't good, Carolina, NYJ, Atlanta?????...Miami is okay. Got drilled by Saints, Lions, Seahawks and Bills. Murderers row.



So if that's your standard for good teams, we're 2-2 against team, as the Saints and Bills are no better than the Vikings, Panthers, Dolphins, Eagles etc.

Take away that horrible start, from which we bounced back and have totally turned around, we're 2-0. Your shoddy reasoning in that case, not mine.

So, how impressive is this team...tell me? We've played good football? We've played bad teams and when we play a team with a very good defense we score 16, 13, and 7 points. LOL. Like a college team getting fat on cupcake that gets exposed when it plays a real team...that is Green Bay. Hey, though, we did beat New England, though...AT HOME, which is why it was beyond critical to get HFA throughout...did you not notice or have you missed that we've lost 4 games on the road this year and looked bad in all 4? Have you not noticed that we haven't lost at home?

So, rah, rah, rah all you'd like... losing yesterday puts a roadie to Seattle squarely into play. Yup, no big deal...it's all right in front of us...no way Aaron plays like that again...it's out of his system, right? Uh huh... no pattern... every single game on the road vs. a good D he folds...just folds...but Seattle at Seattle for the NFC Championship is going to be the trend breaker. Okay. Okay.



You know, normally I'd look up all the statistics from those road games, but I'm going to take a gamble and say they're rather amazing, regardless. The only game I can remember he "folded" in was against the Seahawks in the opener and last night against the Bills. A, what I asume will be, 4-4 record on the road is worse than I predicted, as well. That said, I see no reason why we'd have to lose on the road in the play-offs. Seattle's going to be tough, but it's far from a lost game.

Now, objectively, give me a reason why we're dead in the water in that game. Where do we match up so horribly that we couldn't possibly pull out a victory?
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Before counting Tampa Bay as a W, I believe Aaron Rodgers is winless at Tampa Bay.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago

Before counting Tampa Bay as a W, I believe Aaron Rodgers is winless at Tampa Bay.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



1&2 vs Tampa

Last meeting was in 2011, Rodgers 23of34 299yds 3TD 1INT QBRating 112.3
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (19m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (28m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (39m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (22h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.