Olivia Munn ruined Aaron Rodgers· Page 2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

Go back and look at the comments that came out after Rodgers 60 Minutes interview...he was very upset with the way he was portrayed and what was left out of the interview. The piece referenced he hated for people to say to him that he looked smaller in person than on TV.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Rodgers especially was upset that footage of him at a charity function to help fight childhood cancer landed on the cutting-room floor.

"For them to not even show really any of the content from that night, any of the kids, to not say anything about the (Midwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer) Fund, what they do for kids with cancer, I think that was the thing that was most disappointing about the piece," Rodgers said. "They had an opportunity to do some great things and really show some things I am passionate about and didn't do that."

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Kevin...I'm pretty aware of that...I was the one who told you to look into it. Dig deeper and see how 60 minutes said he was about the interview.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#13

Packers aren't a dominate team.. nothing has changed. When you find a dominate team these days.. let me know. I don't see one..

But whatever.. some find it fun to just stir.

Oh an Rodgers is a slightly insecure and very conservative about his image, his privacy and takes slight of comments made about him. Same guy that has been here since day one.. doesn't change the fact he is about as good as there is.

Oh my he has a personal life. What is funny.. people thinking that a personal life/ love interest is ruining the player.. see the knuckleheads in Dallas with Simpson. Also nothing new.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

IronMan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#14

Don't feed the troll guys. Don't worry. He will disappear again after the Packers win a few more games. He thrives when the Packers lose, which thankfully isn't very often.

wpr
Preferred Member

10 years ago

#15

Oh my he has a personal life. What is funny.. people thinking that a personal life/ love interest is ruining the player.. see the knuckleheads in Dallas with Simpson. Also nothing new.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

People were also saying the same thing about Cutler but then they realized he sucks all the time.

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#16

I didn't see Olivia's comments about their sex life or the 60 minutes interview, but I also don't need to in order to realize that this is one of the dumbest posts brought up on these boards.

Why the hell are we talking about or concerned with a player's sex life?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: musccy

In fairness, I split these these out of the Pretenders/Contenders thread. I agree with your question 100%. Some act like no NFL player has a significant other or something.

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#18

I figured it was split, zero.

So the bottom line of this split thread is that Rodgers doesn't like people to know about his personal life, and he apparently has sex with a fairly attractive celebrity.

How that has ANYTHING to do with his performance, or why either of those two things should be of ANY concern to us is completely beyond me. There are countless professions where you can ill-afford a negative public/social media perception. Teachers, religious leaders, and politicians just to name a few. I coach at a college so I'm in the same boat. Aaron Rodgers is a little testy about how he's perceived. Ladi - f'n - dah.

sschind
Senior Member

10 years ago

#19

We know he's private but we don't know him or how things that happen off the field effect him personally. We don't know to what extent those things do bother him or what effect those things have on his on field performance. I sincerely doubt Olivias comments had more of an effect than say Buffalo's coverage, the wind, Buffalo's pass rush, fan noise or many other factors. I guess Jordy, Adams, Quarless and Boykin were all super bothered by the comments as well.

Originally Posted by: steveishere

Well, Boinkin probably was since they were talking about him.

nyrpack
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#20

who cares if hes going out with her, shes hot , hes a star athlete with big buck$ , derek jeter in ny made a career of hanging with the big time girls and it never affected him on the field !!

jimmy b.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (29m) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (12h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (12h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (12h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (12h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (16h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (18h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (20h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (20h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (21h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (22h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (22h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (22h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (22h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS