Packers LB A.J. Hawk at a crossroads again· Page 12

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

I thought this was an A.J.Hawk thread. He has given his best, but is just slowing down. I say try to trade him for Draft picks. I my opinion, The first 2015 Draft pick should be used to get the best Linebacker available.

Anyone know a good 6'4" to 6'5" , 250 lb Linebacker that will be a good pick. Must be strong, quick, and very smart. A list of 2 or 3 players could fuel a good discussion.

👍

Originally Posted by: Smokey

You wouldn't get a 7th rounder for AJ Hawk. Guy has nothing left and when he did have something it wasn't much.

The kid from SCState can play...Joe Thomas...had he not been hurt in preseason, he may have actually been on the 53.

Wait, this is TT... he probably would've been PS'ed in favor of Bradford who didn't deserve it but was a draft pick. Kind of like Jumal Rolle severely outplaying Goodson but getting cut. Rolle has 3 picks for the Texans.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#112

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Took you awhile, but there you are!!!!

The Smartest man in Football is back!!!!

Damn, why the hell hasn't Ted Thompson been fired?????

One trick Pony, sooner or later, it all comes back to YOU hating on Ted Thompson, and you coming up with ridiculous claims trying to make Ted look bad!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Damn, took you 8 pages this time you are losing your touch!!!

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Rockmolder
Honored Member

10 years ago

#113

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Or like David Clowney, Lawrence Guy, Ricky Elmore...

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#114

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Beyond all the nonsense you type in reply, explain to me who outplayed who in preseason... Demetri Goodson or Jumal Rolle? That's all there is in your reply...a non answer to that question...so I ask. Will you respond with an actual answer since you love talking football? Or...will you type nonsense in reply? I'm going with nonsense.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#115

Buck... I thought this would help us understand who and where we are on this...

You are level 1 at the bottom of the pyramid, and not a very creative one at that. Soak that in for a second, if you can. It might help you. Might.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#116

Or like David Clowney, Lawrence Guy, Ricky Elmore...

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder

What UDFA that had never been on the roster in a previous was kept over Clowney? BTW, do you know why they drafted Clowney in the first place? Sure it was to be a WR or was it for some other ST role?

Lawrence Guy was IR'ed.

Ricky Elmore...a DE conversion that failed... to compare his situation to Rolle's is ridiculous. We wanted to keep Rolle we just couldn't stomach cutting a draft pick to do it. With Elmore it was completely different. A little memory refresher...from ESPN.com

Worst pick: Ricky Elmore, OLB.

The Packers tried to convert Elmore (No. 197, 2011) from a defensive end at Arizona to an outside linebacker in their 3-4 scheme, but it did not work. They cut him at the end of training camp and thought so little of his potential that they did not bother even bringing him back to the practice squad.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#117

Buck... I thought this would help us understand who and where we are on this...

You are level 1 at the bottom of the pyramid, and not a very creative one at that. Soak that in for a second, if you can. It might help you. Might.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

WOW, Now we have charts to look at!!!!!

Fool, when are you going to understand, you are irrelevant to me, accept for the fact that I have succeeded in getting you to do what you always do.

Quote other people, make irrelevant points, bash Ted Thompsons decisions, and best of all supplying me with laugh after laugh.

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

I'm not going to talk REAL football with you, why?

BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE!!!!

But please don't stop, it is amusing.

😆 😆 😆 😆

Anybody ever going to lock this thread down?

I think everyone has agreed that AJ Hawk is not performing well at this point, the reason doesn't matter, it's just a fact.

I stated before, The Packers are lucky Barrington has shown he can replace Hawk and the D is better.

The only difference in opinions is what AJ Hawk has meant to The Packers his whole career, and as with most players, those views are never going to change.

Really is time to move on, but if I can get a few more laughs from reading "The most intelligent football mind" ever to grace this forum posts, so be it.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#118

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Why would you want it locked? Now, if I know you, and I think I do, the last thing you would ever want is to lock a thread where you were just handing it to me post after post. Must be the opposite having you screaming UNCLE, Buck.

I'm glad we got a little football talk out of you after countless posts of bottom level pyramid reaction.

You're right....you aren't going to change your opinion of a Buckeye player... you'd rather go down with the ship than to ever admit you're wrong. I can somewhat admire that.

Just glad the AJ stuff is almost over...he'll be gone soon enough.

EDIT: BTW, I don't wish to fight with you. I understand you. No more AJ talk out of me. HE is irrelevant.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#119

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

Damn, I put it there Straight as I can and you still won't stop your stupidity.

😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#120

Going forward, Buck, focus on the pyramid and see if you can level up slowly but surely. It would be a tragedy for you to never take a step.

Fundamentals.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (12h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (16h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS