Then let him go.

When you already have the best QB in the league, not me.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

It would have been worth it simply for the uniqueness of it. I mean, Rodgers is great and all but such an oddity only comes around once in a life time and McCarthy missed it. I don't think we ever went with 5 TEs even with Rodgers in at QB.

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 

There is probably a reason he didn't. 2 or 3 of the TE couldn't catch the ball. Several couldn't block.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Wouldn't have mattered-just throw it to Finley and enter a footnote into NFL lore! Everybody wins except the opposing D 🖐

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 

One thing of which we can all be certain is that Ted will have affixed a value to Cobb, from which he will not acquiesce.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Agreed, Ted will not vary one iota in that regard.

Had to give you applaud just for using the word acquiesce.👍

Originally Posted by: Gilligan 

Yeah, but he gets a few lashes in the dojo for using that word.

Actually, I think Cobb has some real bargaining power. Adams isn't there yet, and we still don't have the elite athletic tight end. The guys we have at tight end are adequate, but not good enough to think they can steal some of Cobb's production to be arrogant enough to let him walk. Our young receivers provide a large drop-off in ability that Cobb has shown.

How much money do we have to use before the end of the year?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

the salary cap projected to spike from $133 million to perhaps as much as $145 million next year and $160 million in 2016.
Cap room shouldn't be an issue — the Packers have about $8.2 million remaining this year, according to the NFL Players Association. Based off next year's projections they probably will have $30 million in cap room with a free-agent list that includes Tramon Williams, B.J. Raji, Bryan Bulaga and Letroy Guion.