I don't believe in this "peaking too early" crap. If we are, then New England is too, and nobody seems to be saying that.
as for the Vikings game, we've scored over 50 against two better teams/better defenses (theoretically anyway) the past two weeks; Why would we not beat the Vikings even worse than that?

Packers 56 - Vikings 14

I really hope we have Tolzien active this game; I'm getting a little tired of seeing Flynn flounder when we get way ahead instead of Tolzien having a chance to show why he should be the number two.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

TPB,

Tolzien is not going to be active unless there is an injury to Flynn of Rodgers.

Flynn is the backup, when he goes in it is usually with other backups, it is unrealistic to expect them to play like the 1st unit, especially when the opponent is still playing their 1st string guys.

Flynn showed last year his knowledge of the system and experience far outweighed the fact that Tolzien has a better arm.

Tolzien is right where he should be, he will get his shot again next year and will probably have a good shot at supplanting Flynn.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 

I'm going to say Rodgers and Lacy both have big games and we hit the 50-burger trifecta: Packers 54, Vikings 20

Originally Posted by: Since69 

Tolzien actually looked pretty good last year when Mike unleashed him deep to mid range. It's just that stupid predictable dink and dunk shit that caused problems.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

I know what you're saying, our entire offense is dink and dunk right now lol. It's beyond frustrating to watch. Teddy has been pretty good in that 10-20 yard range, but for whatever reason he's been reluctant to pull the trigger more often, and too quickly looks for the checkdown. Checkdowns that start 5 yards behind the LOS, and go nowhere. It's going to be a bloodbath if our offense looks anything like it did against the Bears.

Originally Posted by: Reignman