I wish you'd explain those mysterious "numbers" which make things different than what good sense and your gut tell say. Good job of finally dropping the Bengals, but there are still a lot of things which are WAY off the wall. I submit mine as something more realistic:

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

Telling you wouldn't be much fun, now would it? 🙂

As for my gut, I post a "gut" upset each week. Granted, last week I was bias, admitted as much and also believed Tony Romo would not play.

A team isn't their last two or three gamesisn't their last two or three games and that's how most power rankings go. My gut is these rankings, even though they are predicated on a specific algorithm.

Like I said too, I think the Eagles are little low, but you watch. When we have a Super Bowl winner, I can almost guarantee they will be one of the top five on my last power rankings post of the regular season. Until then, keep'em coming. ;-)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

I think you just enjoy being contrary hahahaha. If a team "isn't their last two or three games" and the whole season what counts, the WHY does won/lost record mean so little in your rankings?

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

These are the kind of stats that throw things off kilter.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool