A veto'd trade!· Page 2

Smokey
Veteran Member

10 years ago

I can't say what's going on in your league, but is it worth all of the drama. In life , sometimes you're the bug , then sometimes you're the windshield. So either clean the windshield or get regenerated into a new life. If you can't change the past, you may just change the future. Put it behind you and go get busy . [boxing]

Pack93z
Select Member

10 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: dhazer

I don't know you else vetoed it.. I didn't like I stated on fleaflicker. I can't see the trade in the history on fleaflicker.. open and completed trades only.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#13

So who were the other 4 that vetoed it and if it would have been anyone else the trade would have went thru. The league is actually boring because there are no trades and the waiver wire is empty but oh well so be it. Thats the way it is and like I said I can be like the others and just veto trades and not explain why and when the facts are thrown out there to prove the trade I will just use my opinion to make a point and call it facts. Noone bother try sending trades to me because they will all be rejected my team will be the players I have now and maybe some waiver wire guys.

BTW its funny how someone calls the trade really lopsided but yet he turns and sends me a trade like this

Ohyafoster gets
Stevan Ridley RB NE (rank: 32-164) from Jenova Project
Colin Kaepernick QB SF (rank: 14-24) from Jenova Project
Randall Cobb WR GB (rank: 18-58) from Jenova Project
Team 2 gets
Percy Harvin WR SEA (rank: 26-79) from Ohyafoster
Peyton Manning QB DEN (rank: 3-3) from Ohyafoster
Marshawn Lynch RB SEA (rank: 1-13) from Ohyafoster

Seriously mine was lopsided and this wasn't lol

Screw everyone I will still win this league without anyone elses help SO SCREW YOU ALL

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Sure is interesting how you continue to target me when I echo'd Rockmolder and then Porky88 chimed in with similar reasoning. You must still be pissed off at how much I kick your ass in Fantasy Sports!!! 😆

Yep, I offered you a lopsided trade. That's how you start a negotiation, you tilt things your way and the other person tilts its their way and you meet in the middle. Well, unless you have an Ohio State University education, then you just accept a kick in the pants and call it a day.

Anyhow, you know two of the four veto's and had three people explain how it was lopsided. It is time to move on. 🐴

uffda udfa
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#14

There's no logic whatsoever to veto that trade especially this early in the season. You got hosed on that deal, or non deal.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Smokey
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#15

GET OVER IT ! MOVE ON & GET OVER IT !

dhazer
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#16

Hmmmmmmm Interesting that Gore and Rainey are both starting. Where is the so called experts that that said Rainey will always be the backup and so will Gore. Yes I messed up and dropped them players and boy how fast did they get scooped up.

BTW starting the season 0-6 and now I am on the verge of being just 2 games out of the playoffs :)

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: dhazer

We're still waiting on how the trade I had was not fair and for whom. I'm still lost on that accusation.

dhazer
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#18

Ok what did you give up lets take a look.

A running back that could be kicked off the team
A backup TE that noone really knows
and an injured back up running back

And you got a starting RB and a starting TE (yes they run a 2 TE set)

But then again its fair and to think my trade I had vetoed was 3 starting players for 1 starters lol and I was the one getting the 1 starter

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#19

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Gavin Escobar is taking over for Jason Witten and Joseph Randle will be asked to take carries from Demarco Murray. I wouldn't start either of them, except maybe Escobar. Darren Sproles when he's healthy is a starter.

Tim Wright and Shane Vereen are not starters, unless you have no one else, lol.

This is not an excessively lopsided trade. I got depth and he got a starter. And you bringing up your trade just makes me think you're salty and that's why you're reaching so deep here.

Jenova Project gets
Tim Wright TE NE (rank: 19-267) from The Fighting Roadkill
Shane Vereen RB NE (rank: 18-111) from The Fighting Roadkill

The Fighting Roadkill gets
Gavin Escobar TE DAL (rank: 26-331) from Jenova Project
Joseph Randle RB DAL (rank: 81-464) from Jenova Project
Darren Sproles RB PHI (rank: 19-121) from Jenova Project

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#20

Originally Posted by: dhazer

You want TE Tim Wright? You feel he is a starter. Make me an offer. You're high on the guy, I am not. Lets make a deal.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (9m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (9m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (30m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (2h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (3h) : Packers will get in

beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS