texaspackerbacker
10 years ago
I see a couple of you guys bit on Dakota's diversionary shit - ruining the thread as soon as it takes the inevitable turn away from leftist orthodoxy.

Wade, I hate to either agree with the newby leftist over you, or even fence-sit between what you said and he said, but you did kinda go overboard about McCain. This may be heresy, and Gunny, feel free to criticize, but merely being taken prisoner and staying there for a long period alone doesn't exactly fit my definition of "hero". Rather, that would require doing something extraordinary and VOLUNTARY either to accomplish the mission or save other troops. I guess he did fly missions over enemy territory, and THAT is more heroic IMO than getting shot down, captured, held and abused for however long it was.

As for his politics, I see him as a fairly shallow creature of convenience. He cowtowed to the damn libs, and probably for that reason, LOST the election and gave us damn Obama. Now, it apparently seems politically expedient to him to go all tea party. That, to me, is more moral phoniness than moral fiber.

I await VinceLambeauStarr's response to get back on topic of what this thread was supposed to be about.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
10 years ago
The worst part about the continuation of this horrible thread is that it gives blowhards like Texas an arena to beat down gay people. Gay people have taken more than their share of beat downs in this world, and we have finally come to an era in our human existence that they have the confidence to not take shit from assholes anymore, but dinausours like Texas think they still have some kind of moral high ground.

As for McCain, I think he's a douche because of his demands that this country go to war for any reason available. Yeah we get it, John, you're pissed about being a POW. Go to therapy.
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

The worst part about the continuation of this horrible thread is that it gives blowhards like Texas an arena to beat down gay people. Gay people have taken more than their share of beat downs in this world, and we have finally come to an era in our human existence that they have the confidence to not take shit from assholes anymore, but dinausours like Texas think they still have some kind of moral high ground.

As for McCain, I think he's a douche because of his demands that this country go to war for any reason available. Yeah we get it, John, you're pissed about being a POW. Go to therapy.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



hahahaha You just couldn't let the thread die huh? And then you whine about it. I think you're addicted to arguing shit like this; That's OK, I probably am too.

When/where did you EVER see me "beat down gay people"? - even with words hahahaha. Hate the SIN, not the SINNER, that's what I say. Most homosexual people just want to be left alone to practice their perversion in peace. I would even go so far as to say they themselves think of their behavior as abnormal and perverted. They don't - in most cases - give a damn about legislation, regulation, etc. They don't even care to inflict their behavior on the general population. THAT is the agenda of non-homosexual leftists - either the good-hearted "do-gooder" type, or the sick anti-American type (Dakota).

I guess we pretty much agree on McCain hahahaha - you do know he flip-flopped - against the war before he was for it? He's a political animal, pure and simple.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
DakotaT
10 years ago

hahahaha You just couldn't let the thread die huh? And then you whine about it. I think you're addicted to arguing shit like this; That's OK, I probably am too.

When/where did you EVER see me "beat down gay people"? - even with words hahahaha. Hate the SIN, not the SINNER, that's what I say. Most homosexual people just want to be left alone to practice their perversion in peace. I would even go so far as to say they themselves think of their behavior as abnormal and perverted. They don't - in most cases - give a damn about legislation, regulation, etc. They don't even care to inflict their behavior on the general population. THAT is the agenda of non-homosexual leftists - either the good-hearted "do-gooder" type, or the sick anti-American type (Dakota).

I guess we pretty much agree on McCain hahahaha - you do know he flip-flopped - against the war before he was for it? He's a political animal, pure and simple.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



It's funny how a credit jumping, tax evading, lazy, bigoted white man like you has the audacity to call anybody anti-American. Then throw your sham of a marriage to a girl younger than children - and that doesn't leave us with much to speak kindly too kindly of you.

You beat down gay people, minorities, immigrants, and actual good normal Americans with your overbearing, abominable views of the world and how you think this world should be. And worst of all, you actually can't see it!

Now I didn't hurt your feelings, did I, because Wayne thinks I'm too abrasive with horrible right wing ding? You don't kill dickheads with kindness. You get in the gutter with them and get ugly.
UserPostedImage
Gilligan
10 years ago

..You beat down gay people, minorities, immigrants, and actual good normal Americans with your overbearing, abominable views of the world and how you think this world should be. And worst of all, you actually can't see it!

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



DakotaT,

A lot people chalk up the type of diatribes like TexasPackerBacker and his ilk to “old white man” talk.

But I disagree, "old white man" is no defense for bigotry.
A bigot is a bigot, and age is no excuse.

These guys may be old coots now, but they didn’t grow up in the antebellum South.
They grew up in an America that was changing by the decade, even by the day, moving fitfully to a broader acceptance of civil rights and human liberties.
They may be creaky old men now, but they were young men or mere children in the 60's & 70's

When today’s old bigots were young, they failed to listen, failed to learn.


I am chosen by many but taken by no one.
IronMan
10 years ago
Whats wrong with gay marriage? Nothing. End of thread.
DoddPower
10 years ago


I guess we pretty much agree on McCain hahahaha - He's a political animal, pure and simple.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



As far as I'm concerned, this is the case for every mainstream politician. If not, they wouldn't be "mainstream" in the first place. I don't doubt that many start from a pure place. But if one wants to rise to the top, they have to play ball. That's one of the biggest problems with politics, imo.

texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

As far as I'm concerned, this is the case for every mainstream politician. If not, they wouldn't be "mainstream" in the first place. I don't doubt that many start from a pure place. But if one wants to rise to the top, they have to play ball. That's one of the biggest problems with politics, imo.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



True, but what does this have to do with gay marriage? You do realize, most of those "mainstream politicians" push the crap you love so much - including, but certainly not limited to gay marriage and the homosexual agenda in general, dontcha? Do you think they do that because they are nice do-gooder people like you seem to be? Hell No! It's all about staying in power/getting the votes of what they perceive as the new majority consisting of the old traditional Dem/lib coalition of minorities, enhanced by a younger generation they see as brainwashed to their point of view by the leftist media and leftist educational establishment. I think that perception is wrong, though. I guess we will find out in the '14 and '16 elections. I'm pretty optimistic; How about you hahahaha?


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
texaspackerbacker
10 years ago

It's funny how a credit jumping, tax evading, lazy, bigoted white man like you has the audacity to call anybody anti-American. Then throw your sham of a marriage to a girl younger than children - and that doesn't leave us with much to speak kindly too kindly of you.

You beat down gay people, minorities, immigrants, and actual good normal Americans with your overbearing, abominable views of the world and how you think this world should be. And worst of all, you actually can't see it!

Now I didn't hurt your feelings, did I, because Wayne thinks I'm too abrasive with horrible right wing ding? You don't kill dickheads with kindness. You get in the gutter with them and get ugly.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Ooooooh, did I get to you? Or is it just things slipping away in general hahahahaha?

I plead guilty to the whole first paragraph. I think we've had this discussion before - Some people whine about being anti-government (not necessarily you on that one); Some whine about the corporate bigwigs getting over on us little people - I would say "good normal Americans", but basically we're talking about the same crowd. I LIVE what you and your kind only whine about. Admittedly, my "credit jumping, tax evading" ain't gonna make a very big dent in the establishment, but it works for me - I'm proud, healthy, and extremely happy. Something tells me that the same cannot be said for somebody posting the crap you post. But then most on your side of the spectrum are sad dissatisfied losers who just can't manage to enjoy the magnificent freedom and prosperity we all enjoy in America. It must really suck to be like that hahahahaha.

The second paragraph I'll lump in with my reply to Gilligan. Is that OK with you, Skipper?



Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Gilligan
10 years ago

The second paragraph I'll lump in with my reply to Gilligan. Is that OK with you, Skipper?

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Save your childish taunts asshole, I've heard them all.
My last name is Gilligan.

I got your type pegged, Ray.
I am chosen by many but taken by no one.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (4h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (14h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (18h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (22h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (22h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12m / Random Babble / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.