RaiderPride
15 years ago
Forget for a moment who may be hired to coach the "D" Forget who might be D.C. who he will bring in, and what scheme they will run.

I would like to get the forums view on the move it self. The whole house cleaning thing. You have to admit, no one really expected the whole house to be torn down and re built. (I Know Moss is still here, but I think he is gone anyway.)

Personally I think it is gutsy. There is no doubt that if this does not work, Mike M. is putting his head coaching neck in the noose.

I am a firm believer in hiring slow, and firing fast in business. It is proven, it works, and most people do not realize the financial cost to a company with a bad hire. In football that cost is wins, and wins have value just like sales do in business.

First think I thought of it was done to make the DC job more attractive to hire the best candidate. The chance to bring in all his own people, and run it his way. Having the ability to have input and bring in his own people might entice one of the head coaching candidates, or the BEST CANDIDATE.

Like it or not... I think the move shows direction, and commitment to change. I like the fact that it sends a message to the players that the team is willing to clean house and expects accountability from the top down.

Your thoughts?
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
IMO, I think the move is right, and to me shows that Moss will not be the DC. Unless there has already been talk with him and he said he doesn't want any of the assistants.

That is why I think the replacement would come from outside the organization.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
shield4life
15 years ago
Yes it is a risk, I agree. The move was made so most probably we could start a new scheme and a complete new look. Now will it work no guarantee's, but better then having Sanders running the show 🙂. I feel like Mike Nolan and his staff is heading to GB.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
Pack93z
15 years ago
Is it gutsy or does it speak of a little heat being felt?

Personally, I like the move.. in three years the defensive performances have been roller coastish and lacking of in game flexibility to adjust to what the offenses were doing.. time and time again.. if an offense was able to do something successfully in the first quarter of a game.. they had success doing the exact same thing late in the game.. didn't play to the game at hand.. just to the scheme moreso.

I understand the gutting of the staff to allow a new DC to hire his people into place.. but leaving Moss on the roster then?

It shall be interesting to see how this shakes out.. hopefully soon if the St Louis search doesn't drag out to long.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
IronMan
15 years ago



Like it or not... I think the move shows direction, and commitment to change. I like the fact that it sends a message to the players that the team is willing to clean house and expects accountability from the top down.

Your thoughts?

"RaiderPride" wrote:



Couldn't agree more. I didn't think Mike McCarthy had it in him. I couldn't have been more wrong!

UserPostedImage
gbpfan
15 years ago
I think it speaks volume,that M.M. made these moves just hope,who ever is d.c. comes in with a good scheme,and the players adapt .
DakotaT
15 years ago
I think everyone is overreacting. The new DC will and should be allowed to choose HIS own coaches. Maybe a few of these guys will be hired back, but let's wait and see who gets the top job first.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
15 years ago
I brought up in another thread a little bit of a twist to this.

If you remember McCarthy retainted Sanders after Bates balked. Mac wanted Bates but he was too pissed he didn't get HC to stick around so Mike McCarthy elevated Sanders to keep the defense intact that Bates used.

They felt this important because there was Bates and before him Slowick and before him Donetell so they didn't want to change the "D" around again.

Now I think under the circumstances at the time this may have been in the best interest of the team but I wonder if he had his druthers would McCarthy have gone this route to begin with? I don't know.

Which leads me to another topic. We may not have had to clean up this mess if Sherman had not used Donetell as a scape goat for the 4th and 26th debacle against Philly. The Packers really screwed up letting him get away.

Other than '07 our "D" has never played at the level he had them at.
"The train is leaving the station."
15 years ago
Agreed, no coach should get fired for one player out of position on one play. It was absurd. I think I wanted the OC gone that year and they fired the DC. I couldn't believe it.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
15 years ago
Ironman......thats SICK!!! (As in FUNNY sick!!!)LOLOLOL!!!

Anyways......i like the moves.
All the people that were complaining, saying that Mike McCarthy wouldn't do anything have to be surprised now. And i think the moves were do. Lets face it, the D stunk this year. For every big play they made, they would make a bad one.
Hopefully this will work and get our D where it SHOULD be.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (8h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (10h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (20h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (20h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
39m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Random Babble / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.