Former Packers DL C.J. Wilson Signs with Raiders· Page 2

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

looks like mckenzie isnt taking the ted approach, thats why they will always be in the cellar !!

Originally Posted by: nyrpack

Ted signed plenty of FAs, back when the cupboards were bare. Koren Robinson, Mark Roman, Marquand Manual, etc.

Let McKenzie stock up on good players and win a SB. Then see how much he spends.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

10 years ago

#12

Solid against the run. Dunno why they didn't use him more last year.

Oh yeah, Capers.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Yeah it's Capers fault that all the other healthy DL out played him and earned their way past him...

Wilson was solid paying two gap, but was under average at everything else.

If Worthy was healthy at the start of the season, Wilson might not of even made the team last year.

And Boyd came in and out played him as a rookie.

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: beast

Boyd was a NT.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

10 years ago

#14

Boyd was a NT.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Boyd was used at NT, DT and DE, he wasn't just a NT. And he out played Wilson to get on the field.

From what I heard of Wilson sounds like he's a GREAT MAN! But he got out played last year by the other guys stepping up and he didn't.

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

10 years ago

#15

Considering that he was a 7th rounder, I'd say the Packers squeezed all they could out of him and then found something better. Best of luck to him.

As far as the Raiders signing a ton of Packers FA-they're not exactly breaking the bank signing him and Jones. I think this is more McKenzie bringing in vets so he can tell his young guys/draft picks "These guys won a Super Bowl and come from a background where winning is an expected thing. They know what it takes to win and the dedication it takes. Emulate them."

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#16

I've heard a few times that C.J. Wilson is good against the run. Compared to other players at the same position in the same defensive scheme, he is ranked 50th against the run. I think marginal player is overstating his value. Mike Daniels and Jerel Worthy both ranked much higher. (Worthy had just 12 snaps.)

DakotaT
Select Member

10 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I like Worthy, Daniels, and Boyd. I just wish we could find a better nose tackle than Raji. I believe Raji to be lazy and stupid. The jury is still out on Datone Jones and what Peppers will bring us. But CJ Wilson, good riddance.

steveishere
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

If that's PFF rankings he was ranked 10th in 2012. He got injured last year and his play and snaps suffered for it.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#19

If that's PFF rankings he was ranked 10th in 2012. He got injured last year and his play and snaps suffered for it.

Originally Posted by: steveishere

That is quite true and for comparison sake, B.J. Raji was ranked 6th.

DoddPower
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#20

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

I don't have any problem with the guy, but he is the definition of a replaceable player, imo.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (8h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (9h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (9h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (12h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (12h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (12h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (15h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (15h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (15h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (15h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (15h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (15h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (15h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (15h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (16h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (17h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (17h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (17h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (17h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (17h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (18h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (18h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (18h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (18h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (19h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (20h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (20h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (21h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (21h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (21h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (21h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (21h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (21h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (21h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (21h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (21h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (21h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (21h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (21h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (22h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (22h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS