Rockmolder
10 years ago
Rumours about the Packers from Walterfootball :

The Green Bay Packers have their defense as the priority of their offseason. It sounds as though Green Bay is more inclined to draft for defense early rather than offensive players like a new tight end or offensive line help. Sources with the Packers say they want to improve the speed and playmaking ability on their defense. Getting their defense more dynamic and faster is a top priority of their offseason according to sources.



The Packers are also interested in Stanford outside linebacker Trent Murphy . Green Bay has some edge rushers in Clay Matthews and Nick Perry, but both players have dealt with injuries. Murphy (6-5, 252) fits the mold as an edge rusher in their defense as he led the nation with 15 sacks last season. If Murphy falls to their second-round pick, that would be ideal for Green Bay.



Rumours involving the Packers from NFL Trade rumours :

A Packers scout reportedly mentioned that “based on what I’m seeing Tahj Boyd  is not draftable."

Tony Pauline added that Boyd’s showing on Monday “Ugly” as he “makes receivers work too hard to catch the ball.”



Not totally Packers related, a part from it being our scout, but that guy had some momentum going at one point. He's compared to Russell Wilson on the CBS site (take that with a grain of salt), but he's having a rough time right now.

Players who the Packers have had meetings  with:

Tre Boston, S, North Carolina (East-West Shrine game)
Max Bullough , LB , Michigan State (East-West Shrine game)
Trent Murphy , DL, Stanford (Very interested, nothing about where they've had a meeting. I'd assume the Senior Bowl)

I've decided to add some mock drafts to see who the draftnicks have the Packers taking:

[list]
  • Row12 (Our very own Porky88)  - C.J. Mosley, ILB, Alabama 
  • Walter Football (Walter)  - Ra'Shede Hageman, DE/DT, Minnesota 
  • Walter Football (Charlie Campbell)  - Calvin Pryor, S, Louisville 
  • NFL.com (Daniel Jeremiah)  - Ha Ha Clinton-Dix, S, Alabama 
  • NFL.com (Bucky Brooks)  - Louis Nix III, NT, Notre Dame [/list]


    This is all I have time for right now. I'll add some others when I get the chance.

    Updated 22-01
    musccy
    10 years ago

    the Packers say they want to improve the speed and playmaking ability on their defense. Getting their defense more dynamic and faster is a top priority of their offseason according to sources.



    hasn't this been a point of emphasis for a long time for this defense?
    texaspackerbacker
    10 years ago
    Murphy seems like a good player, but I don't really like the concept of taking college DEs and using them as OLBs. That's Nick Perry; Murphy may be better than Perry, but he's still basically the same situation. Clay Matthews is an example of a LB being used as a LB. Most of the good pass rushing OLBs as well as ILBs around the league are like that: successful and athletic college LBs, not converted DEs. We need more athleticism at LB.

    The rumors above are good, though, in that they identify the two top areas of need: OLB and Safety, not necessarily in that order. I would add ILB to that.

    One more thing, especially with regard to the talking and interviewing thing: I wish we wouldn't limit ourselves so much with "good character"/"Packer way" type players. Sometimes you can get a guy and make him better in that category. Look at Shields, for example, and a lot of others from other teams. Who would we rather have? a Richard Sherman? or say a Davon House?
    Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
    If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
    steveishere
    10 years ago

    Murphy seems like a good player, but I don't really like the concept of taking college DEs and using them as OLBs. That's Nick Perry; Murphy may be better than Perry, but he's still basically the same situation. Clay Matthews is an example of a LB being used as a LB. Most of the good pass rushing OLBs as well as ILBs around the league are like that: successful and athletic college LBs, not converted DEs. We need more athleticism at LB.

    The rumors above are good, though, in that they identify the two top areas of need: OLB and Safety, not necessarily in that order. I would add ILB to that.

    One more thing, especially with regard to the talking and interviewing thing: I wish we wouldn't limit ourselves so much with "good character"/"Packer way" type players. Sometimes you can get a guy and make him better in that category. Look at Shields, for example, and a lot of others from other teams. Who would we rather have? a Richard Sherman? or say a Davon House?

    Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



    Aldon Smith - college DE
    Robert Mathis - college and NFL DE
    Tamba Hali - college DE
    Elvis Dumervil - college DE
    Terrell Suggs - college DE
    Lamarr Woodley - college DE/LB
    Von Miller - college DE/LB
    Brian Orakpo - college DE

    Richard Sherman isn't really a bad character person and as far as I know wasn't coming out of college. We've got guys on the team who were much worse character guys than Sherman anyway.
    Bigbyfan
    10 years ago

    Aldon Smith - college DE
    Robert Mathis - college and NFL DE
    Tamba Hali - college DE
    Elvis Dumervil - college DE
    Terrell Suggs - college DE
    Lamarr Woodley - college DE/LB
    Von Miller - college DE/LB
    Brian Orakpo - college DE

    Richard Sherman isn't really a bad character person and as far as I know wasn't coming out of college. We've got guys on the team who were much worse character guys than Sherman anyway.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 



    Add DeMarcus Ware to that list.

    Sherman isn't a bad guy. You never hear a single bad word about him from any of his teammates. I have yet to see him play dirty either. He is just a guy who likes to talk, be heard, and does not give a damn what anybody outside of his locker room feels about it.

    I would love to have players like Sherman our team. Maybe our defense would actually look like they give a shit. I'm sure most of the people on this forum would hate to have someone like him, considering the outrage caused by any little comment made by a player that isn't completely cliche or politically correct.


    blank
    DoddPower
    10 years ago

    hasn't this been a point of emphasis for a long time for this defense?

    Originally Posted by: musccy 



    I would think that would pretty much be a priority every off season. For both sides of the ball. Generic statement, but it's good to hear all the same. Hopefully it actually happens.

    Zero2Cool
    10 years ago

    You never hear a single bad word about him from any of his teammates. I have yet to see him play dirty either. He is just a guy who likes to talk, be heard, and does not give a damn what anybody outside of his locker room feels about it.

    Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



    hasn't stopped the masses from blasting Jermichael Finley.
    UserPostedImage
    Bigbyfan
    10 years ago

    hasn't stopped the masses from blasting Jermichael Finley.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    Exactly my point. People want our team to have an attitude or swagger on the field, but blast them when they show even a little of it in an interview.


    blank
    nerdmann
    10 years ago

    Exactly my point. People want our team to have an attitude or swagger on the field, but blast them when they show even a little of it in an interview.

    Originally Posted by: Bigbyfan 



    If a player wants to talk shit, that's fine. But produce on the field. Finley came out every year saying he was going to "take over" the league, and did not impress.

    Sure, this past year he was looking better before he went down. But that's not how good he always looked.
    “Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
    beast
    10 years ago

    Murphy seems like a good player, but I don't really like the concept of taking college DEs and using them as OLBs. That's Nick Perry; Murphy may be better than Perry, but he's still basically the same situation. Clay Matthews is an example of a LB being used as a LB. Most of the good pass rushing OLBs as well as ILBs around the league are like that: successful and athletic college LBs, not converted DEs. We need more athleticism at LB.

    Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



    Yeah you're mistaken about a couple of things there...

    Murphy was a college 3-4 OLB in college, just like Matthews, not a 4-3 DE like Perry.

    But Stanford goes to a 4 man front (just like the Packers) when they put in nickel and Murphy was used as a 4-2 DE then.

    Most are listing Murphy as a DE because they think his future in the NFL is as a 4-3 DE, because some have questioned if he's athletic enough to be a 3-4 OLB at the NFL level, while I haven't seen anyone question weather he seems tough enough / physical enough to be a 4-3 DE as those are his strength. I've seen someone some compare him to Justin Smith, thinking he could become a very athletic 3-4 DE like Justin Smith if any 3-4 team was brave enough to try it, as he plays with the same physical style of play and toughness that Smith does. I'm not sure if I'd go that far but I find the idea interesting.



    Also Steveishere is right a lot of the best pass rushing 3-4 OLBers were pass rushing college DEs.

    3-4 OLB ask guys to read the field, pass rush and the edge to their side. Most college OLBers are 4-3 OLB and most 4-3 OLB aren't used to pass rush or hold the edge nearly as much as 4-3 DEs are. Which makes 4-3 DE and 3-4 OLB sort of the same thing as they're edge guys protecting/attacking the edge... while 4-3 OLB aren't asked to nearly as much.

    I looked up the NFL sacks list, and of the OLB with over 8 sacks this last season, I only saw two that I have found were a LB for more than one year in college.

    Justin Houston who was a 3-4 OLB in college.

    Ahmad Brooks who was a 3-4 OLB in college.

    The other 10 (or so) OLBers with 8 sacks or more this last season were on the DL in college.


    Problem is most colleges use 4-3 systems instead of 3-4 systems... so 3-4 teams have to look for 4-3 DEs which are used to handling the guy duties but can also pick up the LB system, as most of the 4-3 OLB can't pick up the edge duties.

    Aldon Smith - college DE
    Robert Mathis - college and NFL DE
    Tamba Hali - college DE
    Elvis Dumervil - college DE
    Terrell Suggs - college DE
    Lamarr Woodley - college DE/LB
    Von Miller - college DE/LB
    Brian Orakpo - college DE

    Richard Sherman isn't really a bad character person and as far as I know wasn't coming out of college. We've got guys on the team who were much worse character guys than Sherman anyway.

    Originally Posted by: steveishere 




    UserPostedImage
    Fan Shout
    beast (3m) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (4m) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (14m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (26m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (35m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (56m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (2h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (2h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (5h) : Packers will get in
    beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    26m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.