wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

People saying a TE but I really don't think it is that huge of a need. If we have Nelson, Cobb, Jones and Boykin, is a TE really that important? Quarless did a very good job at the end and he is a good blocker. I would worry more about the lines and safety. I see on walters football they have us taking Mosely at ILB.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



It depends on the TE. If they can land an All Pro TE then yeah they need him. If it is just a run of the mill average TE who doesn't do anything outstanding and can be replaced by 30 other guys then no they don't need him.
UserPostedImage
play2win
11 years ago

I don't think it's that different from any other position, really. TE just has lower positional value. Or used to have. Right now, I'd take a TE of Gronk's or Graham's caliber with the 21st pick in a heartbeat.

Not going BPA and drafting purely for need is what teams like the Jaguars tend to do. That nets you guys like Alualu at 10 overall and Gabbert in that same slot. The Lions did the same thing before they started drafting BPA. They've take a big step up from those days since they went with a guy like Farley, even though DT wasn't a need at that time.

The draft is just not something you should fill holes with like that. That's what FA is for. Even if we do barely use FA, that doesn't mean you want to go and then use the draft as a substitute.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



Exactly. Ted must use FA or make a trade for a veteran top FS. Then, draft BPA. Problem is, will he make a move prior to the draft to insure S is covered?
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

I do not know if it applies to safety, but Jason Wilde did say the Packers wouldn't take Matt Elam because of his height. One cornerback in nine drafts doesn't do much to debunk the rule. Plus, I believe Hayward was listed as 6-1 at Vanderbilt. Colleges do exaggerate height, but it's not as if he's as small as Lamarcus Joyner or Terrell Buckley. I’m sure Thompson (and Wolf) had exceptions over their tenure as GM, but I’m guessing it was rare. Regardless, it would surprise me if the Packers took Joyner or any cornerback that small.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
11 years ago

Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Jason Garrett owes 10% of his yearly earnings since becoming a coach in the NFL to Terrell Buckley.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
porky88
11 years ago

Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


I did check every one of Ted Thompson's drafts and I did not find a single cornerback under 5-11. It is the Terrell Buckley rule. I thought it applied to 6-0 and under, but Beast correctly pointed out that it is 5-10 and under. For what it's worth, I found no DB smaller than 5-10. Regardless, this rules out Florida State CB/S Lamarcus Joyner, who I find to be one of the most instinctive players in this draft.
cheeseheads123
11 years ago
Thats a shame because Joyner is one hell of a player
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

I don't think it's that different from any other position, really. TE just has lower positional value. Or used to have. Right now, I'd take a TE of Gronk's or Graham's caliber with the 21st pick in a heartbeat.

Not going BPA and drafting purely for need is what teams like the Jaguars tend to do. That nets you guys like Alualu at 10 overall and Gabbert in that same slot. The Lions did the same thing before they started drafting BPA. They've take a big step up from those days since they went with a guy like Farley, even though DT wasn't a need at that time.

The draft is just not something you should fill holes with like that. That's what FA is for. Even if we do barely use FA, that doesn't mean you want to go and then use the draft as a substitute.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



I agree with most of what you say. The problem is, TE is a position where it is hard to identify a future star. As I said, Gronk and Graham are examples of that. There probably are a lot of negative examples too.

You can modify drafting BPA by putting a few limits on it. For example, no chance we draft a QB or probably not a RB even if they are at the top of the board. All things considered, I would treat TE the same way. What we already have ain't great, but it is pretty decent, and drafting a TE #1 is far from a sure thing to be a star player. Plus, bottom line is the need for defensive playmakers.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
beast
11 years ago

Another very interesting guys that might be there is

DL Stephon Tuitt, Notre Dame, 6-6, 312

He's a prototypical 3-4 DE type than can sub in at NT from time to time but I don't think he can stay there. Though Packers haven't seem to want prototypical 3-4 DEs for what ever reason.

Prototypical 3-4 DE normally have longer limbs to battle with so they can play one gap and two gap better... because of the longer limbs they're usually 6'4" and up and they did grab Datone Jones 6'4" ... but Packers have seemed to prefer going the other way geting shorter guys, the idea of having short guys is they're closer to the ground and there for a better natural leverage point.


I understand having better natural leverage is important but so is keeping guys out of your pads... I question the Packers not grabing more taller DL to get that reach vaule which most 3-4 teams seem to perfer in their DEs.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

I did check every one of Ted Thompson's drafts and I did not find a single cornerback under 5-11. It is the Terrell Buckley rule. I thought it applied to 6-0 and under, but Beast correctly pointed out that it is 5-10 and under. For what it's worth, I found no DB smaller than 5-10. Regardless, this rules out Florida State CB/S Lamarcus Joyner, who I find to be one of the most instinctive players in this draft.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



The only way to correctly point it out is to source the rule directly to Ted Thompson's words. I have yet to see that. Otherwise we can surmise there is a rule to not draft Wisconsin players since Ted Thompson as Packers GM (not sure about Seattle time as draft guru). Or about a hundred other "rules".


I liked that Tyrann Mathieu (sp) coming out of college, but figured he was too short especially after Charles Woodson said something about the Packers needed to get bigger and faster and someone on the staff agreed with him.
UserPostedImage
play2win
11 years ago

The only way to correctly point it out is to source the rule directly to Ted Thompson's words. I have yet to see that. Otherwise we can surmise there is a rule to not draft Wisconsin players since Ted Thompson as Packers GM (not sure about Seattle time as draft guru). Or about a hundred other "rules".


I liked that Tyrann Mathieu (sp) coming out of college, but figured he was too short especially after Charles Woodson said something about the Packers needed to get bigger and faster and someone on the staff agreed with him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yeah, the Mathieu pick was also fraught with character issues. I think that is what kept him out of GB, rather than size/stature. The kid can certainly play the game of football. I wish we had him. At least, I think I do… 😆
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (14h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (18h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (18h) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (19h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (19h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (19h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (19h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (19h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (19h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (19h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (19h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (19h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (20h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (20h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (21h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (21h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (22h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Random Babble / bboystyle

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.