Harris hopes to join Lacy in 1-2 running punch

MintBaconDrivel
Senior Member Topic Starter

11 years ago

GREEN BAY — DuJuan Harris is hoping to be part of the 1-2 running back punch with Eddie Lacy next year that the two were supposed to be this year.

Harris entered training camp as the Green Bay Packers starting running back, coach Mike McCarthy had insisted, but a right knee injury that had sidelined him all offseason recurred in his preseason debut, landing him on injured reserve.

Harris said at midseason that there was fluid on the knee and irritation of the patellar tendon but no structural damage found when he underwent surgery in August, which is a good sign for a full return to action when the offseason program and organized team activities kick off in spring.

"If they would've needed me last night, I'd have switched jerseys with somebody if I needed to," Harris said as the Packers players cleared out their lockers Monday, one day after their season-ending 23-20 NFC Wild Card Playoff loss to the San Francisco 49ers at Lambeau Field.

"I can run. I can outrun a lot of the guys in this league right now. my test is going to be getting it at top speed and then stopping all of a sudden. Once I get that down, I know [the] things I can do."

While Lacy rushed for a Packers rookie record 1,178 yards and 11 touchdowns in essentially 14 games — he added 21 carries for 81 yards in Sunday's loss to the 49ers — No. 2 running back James Starks, who carried 89 times for 493 yards (5.5-yard average) and three touchdowns, is an unrestricted free agent and rookie fourth-round pick Johnathan Franklin suffered a season-ending neck injury after contributing little (19 carries, 107 yards) in his first season.

The door would certainly be open for Harris, who was the Packers' lone productive running back in 2012, to have a role. After his promotion to the 53-man roster from the practice squad, Harris carried 34 times for 157 yards and two touchdowns in the regular season, then added 28 carries for 100 yards and two more TDs in the playoffs. He also caught two passes for 17 yards in the regular season and seven passes for 64 yards in the playoffs.

"It's going to be interesting for people to tune into it," Harris said of 2014. "Hopefully Starks comes back, hopefully I come back. None of us knows what's going to go on this offseason. There could be some surprises. Every year there's some surprises. We've just got to bust our butts. Hopefully everyone's healthy and we're a force to be reckoned with."

Jason Wilde wrote:

Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

blueleopard
Member

11 years ago

Starks was simply fantastic this year, but if he gets too expensive, I wouldn't mind going into next season with Lacy, Harris, and Franklin in the backfield.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

sschind
Senior Member

11 years ago

If Starks leaves Harris will get his chance. We all know Lacy isn't going anywhere and I doubt Franklin is either so that leaves Harris and Starks. Will the Packers keep 4 RBs next year? Who knows. If they go into next season with Lacy, Starks, Franklin and Harris I'll be more than fine with it. If they decide to go with Lacy, Harris, and Franklin that would be OK as well.

I know players don't always say the right things and I'm sure lots of times they don't mean what they say but you gotta at least give Harris credit for saying "Hopefully Starks is back" Its is Starks is his biggest threat to making the team.

DakotaT
Select Member

11 years ago

Packers won't be able to afford Starks, and Harris makes him expendable. I think our bases are covered. Besides, having 4 capable running backs is an unnecessary luxury when obvious glaring holes exist elsewhere on the roster.

sschind
Senior Member

11 years ago

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

You are probably right about affording Starks and its a luxury for sure but I wouldn't say unnecessary. Having 3 capable backups is ALWAYS a good thing if it doesn't hamper your salary cap.

DoddPower
Veteran Member

11 years ago

You are probably right about affording Starks and its a luxury for sure but I wouldn't say unnecessary. Having 3 capable backups is ALWAYS a good thing if it doesn't hamper your salary cap.

Originally Posted by: sschind

That's the problem though. It very likely WILL impact the salary cap. I think the Packers need two dependable borderline #1 running backs given Lacy's physical running style. I would love to see Starks back, but I think Harris and Franklin could get it done. Starks will likely be too expensive, although I'm sure the Packers could afford to keep him if they really wanted to. It may be a wise decision. I really doubt Starks will be incredibly expensive, but who knows. Given how cheap Harris and Franklin probably are, it's not a bad idea. But still, keeping four RBs and a FB is a little excessive on a team with many needs.

rabidgopher04
Member

11 years ago

DuJuan Harris? Oh yeah. I forgot about that guy.

Amazing Bacon Delivery Service! Never be without good bacon again.

beast
Select Member

11 years ago

I want another physical RB behind Lacy, in case something happens to Lacy.

Yes they got Harris and Franklin but both of them were on the IR and can you trust and count on them that they won't again?

but some interesting names out there if Packers are willing to grab anyone in FA (I doubt it at RB).

Toby Gerhart, Vikings ~ Packers fans really say he's poor and only a back-up but he's flashed some really good games and has been behind AP so could he be a very good back-up or even a starter on another team? I think it's possible. Also his brother is a Center on the Packers practice squad.

Rashad Jennings, Raiders~ i got a feeling the Raiders are going to try to resign him. Jennings is a guy I've like since he was in the draft and I wanted the Packers to draft him. Got drafted to the Jags and didn't really get to show anything with Maurice Jones-Drew there. Went to the Raiders flashed some potential.

Maurice Jones-Drew, Jags ~ He'll only be 29... of course 29 is old for a RB, and he'll probably be looking for big money and want to be starter.

Darren McFadden, Raiders ~ Very talented but very injury prone... might do him some good being a back-up though, if no one throws big money his way who knows...

Though i see resigning Starks as more likely or grabbing someone in the draft.

steveishere
Veteran Member

11 years ago

Rashad Jennings I think is a really good back but I think the Raiders are going to re sign him to be their starter. I wanted us to draft Gerhart and I like him but I think someone will over pay him. Pass on McFadden. Out of all those I'd rather keep Starks but I won't be surprised if he gets a good offer from someone. I think Harris and Franklin have shown enough ability that they'd be adequate back ups. We don't need to over pay for a RB behind Lacy, I don't see it as a big enough priority. I think we just keep the guys we've got.

luigis
Member

11 years ago

#10

Lacy, Harris and Starks will be a very good group of RBs.

I don't see Jonathan Franklin making the roster next year regardless of what happens with Starks and Harris.

Luis

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (4h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?

dfosterf (9h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (9h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (9h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (14h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (16h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (18h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (18h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (18h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (19h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (20h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24