No. No. And again, no.
The Packers do not need an all-world back to provide "balance".
Peterson is getting up there in RB mileage.
And, IIRC, he has had two serious injuries (one in college, one in pros) already.
I was not a fan of the Lacy pick (as, I expect you will recall, Wayne). But looks like I was wrong.
And even if Lacy turns out to be a one-year wonder, trading for Peterson makes no sense to me.
If the Packers want to make a "blockbuster" trade (which, of course, Ted does not), go for an OL.
FWIW
Originally Posted by: Wade