GameDay [2013] Green Bay Packers at Baltimore Ravens· Page 5

DoddPower
Veteran Member

11 years ago

not sold on hyde for a punt returner - I mean he looked good in that one run - but to me he looks a bit skinny and can he hang onto the ball I Got to wonder

Originally Posted by: Dulak

Do you have an evidence that makes you think he cannot hold onto the ball?

steveishere
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#42

Apparently House came out because he was getting gassed by being the gunner on punt team. Which makes sense I guess you don't want a tired DB out there trying to cover Jacoby Jones or Torrey Smith. The way House has been playing he should probably be earning snaps over Tramon on defense. Maybe they need to find someone else to be the gunner.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#43

They did wear down late in the game though. Keep that in mind, the next time Aaron goes into no-huddle.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Possession Packers 31:22 Ravens 28:38

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#44

Originally Posted by: steveishere

Why over Tramon? Tramon has played well too. I just do not like when we play a zone in the secondary. I think our corners are talented enough to play man with just about any receiving core in the league. It seems like receivers always find holes in our zone, and it ends up allowing big plays.

steveishere
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#45

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

Because Shields has been taking the tougher assignments this year and Tramon still plays soft when he's doing anything but covering somebody 1 on 1. If House earns any starter reps in the secondary Tramon atm is the weakest link.

nerdmann
Premier Member

11 years ago

#46

Possession Packers 31:22 Ravens 28:38

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Gotta do better than that.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#47

Originally Posted by: steveishere

I think this is a good problem to have. Our secondary is surprisingly very deep. I really just wish we would play more man coverage and stay out of the zone more. Seems like most of the big plays are given up because of a hole in the zone.

beast
Select Member

11 years ago

#48

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go.

Even more big plays might be given up if they played more man coverage. They're doing good, but that's not Harris, Woodson and pre injury Williams out there. They might give a lot more coverages in man and that might be the reason they went to more zone.

But I do agree that I wish we could run some more man, if it wouldn't hurt too much, because I think Burnett could be GREAT at SS and seems like they're trusting Jennings more with FS stuff.

If they were able to get Burnett free, that means the CBs would need to be okay to be on an island by themselves at times, and i'm not sure I fully trust current Williams, and Shields can make GREAT plays, but also makes some big mistakes, would be rolling the dice.

But if they free Burnett thatm might mean more chances for INTs or getting a LB free to blitz etc...

Wade
Veteran Member

11 years ago

#49

Gotta do better than that.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I don't care about this TOP ratio if the Packers D plays as well as they did against Baltimore for all but about 7 minutes in the fourth quarter.

D O M I N A T E ! ! ! ! ! !

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

cheeseheads123
Member

11 years ago

#50

😍 😍

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (17h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (21h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (21h) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (22h) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (22h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (22h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (22h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (22h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (22h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (22h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (22h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (22h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (23h) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (23h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (23h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (23h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22