MintBaconDrivel
11 years ago

GREEN BAY — No lasting judgments were or should have been made from one brief locker-room interview session. But considering the source of the short, blasé answers being given, perhaps it was a sign of things to come.

Tight end Jermichael Finley stood before a thicket of microphones after one of the team's organized team activity practices this spring, and the adjective that previously might have started this sentence — loquacious — was in no way applicable. He basically spent four minutes repeating one phrase.

"I feel good," he said, half a dozen times.

If fewer words leads to greater production from the Green Bay Packers mercurial tight end, that will be wonderful news for Finley's teammates and coaches. The organization decided in March that he was worth keeping around for the final year of his contract, paying him the $3 million roster bonus he was due and running his total compensation for this season to $8.25 million. The 26-year-old enters his sixth NFL season having flashed breathtaking talent, but his production hasn't always matched his bravado.

That said, he did look like a player who was serious about realizing his vast potential during the second half of last season. At midseason, he'd dropped seven passes in the first eight games, his agent had questioned via social media quarterback Aaron Rodgers' leadership abilities, and Finley, never one to censor himself, had continued his outspoken ways, to the chagrin of the organization.

But then, Finley flipped the switch. He wound up breaking the franchise single-season record for receptions by a tight end (61), and he didn't drop a single pass over the final six games (including playoffs). Tight ends coach Jerry Fontenot said Finley's drop percentage early in the season was "about 30 percent," and during the second half of the season, it was down to 6 percent.

Not coincidentally, Finley's relationship with Rodgers was improving during that time, as the pair began spending the night before each game talking about the game plan, how Finley should run his routes and life in general. The connection made a big difference, as Finley caught 26 passes in the final five regular-season games and also had a breakthrough day in Detroit on Nov. 18, when his three receptions included a touchdown and a critical 40-yard catch-and-run to set up the game-winning score.

Then, he showed up for the offseason program having put back on the weight he'd shed in advance of the 2011 season (an unapproved weight loss that had ticked his coaches off to no end), leading head coach Mike McCarthy to say the 6-foot-5, 247-pound Finley looked "excellent. … I really like the offseason that Jermichael has put together so far."

When Finley was told of McCarthy's comments, he simply reacted by saying they were "good to hear" before dismissing it as being "only minicamp." As for his weight, Finley was dismissive of that, too.

"If I play my style of ball, everything else will fall in place and take care of itself at the end of it," he said. "My weight is at (a number where it's) me feeling good and moving fast and physical, feeling healthy. If I do what I'm supposed to do, everything else will take care of itself."

One thing is clear: After an up-and-down 2011, Finley is clearly entering the year on a higher note this time around. Fontenot hopes his finish to last season was a harbinger of things to come.

"He seems like he's really dialed in. as far as expectations go, I didn't set any expectations last year, we just wanted to continue to improve each and every week, and that's the same mentality we're taking this year — let's get better, let's find a starting point and let's get better each and every week. We're capable of doing great things," Fontenot said. "I think we definitely had a year to grow off of last year and the way we finished off the year, I'm happy with where we're starting. But again, we have a long ways to go."

The primary reason Finley figures to be considerably more vital to the offense is the free-agent departure of wide receiver Greg Jennings, who missed half of last season with a lower abdominal muscle tear. Even though Jennings wound up missing so much time, the Packers still went into last season expecting him to be a major contributor. This year, the Packers figure to run plenty of offensive sets with three wide receivers, Finley and a running back on the field, which should lead to more opportunities. (His 61 receptions came on 88 targets.) While McCarthy has vowed to not make the same mistake he did in 2010 — when he built the offense around Finley, only to see him suffer a season-ending knee injury in Week 5 — the coach has always seen Finley as a matchup problem for defenses.

And yet, once again, Finley downplayed the idea of getting more chances with Jennings in Minnesota.

"Of course, losing a big player like that, there's many opportunities for multiple players on the team. For (fellow tight end Andrew) Quarless, me and the receivers we've got. So we're going to have to step it up and make some plays.

"If I do what I'm supposed to do, everything else will take care of itself."

Jason Wilde  wrote:


Zero2Cool
11 years ago
This Finley guy just does not get it. Why won't he just shut up and play???
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
11 years ago
Hopefully he does what he is supposed to do and everything falls into place!
OlHoss1884
11 years ago
As it is a contract year I expect him to be more focused, but I do not expect the team to offer him big money to re-sign, so it's probably his last in GB. I think there are some potentially very good replacements who will get playing time this year to show their stuff, and if Lacy and Franklin turn out to be as good as expected, there will be even less dependence on the TE to catch passes as part of the offense in any case.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" --Albert Einstein
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

As it is a contract year I expect him to be more focused, but I do not expect the team to offer him big money to re-sign, so it's probably his last in GB. I think there are some potentially very good replacements who will get playing time this year to show their stuff, and if Lacy and Franklin turn out to be as good as expected, there will be even less dependence on the TE to catch passes as part of the offense in any case.

Originally Posted by: OlHoss1884 



Shortly after signing the two year contract, Finley had said he was trying too hard to have a great contract year and that took his focus away.
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

As it is a contract year I expect him to be more focused, but I do not expect the team to offer him big money to re-sign, so it's probably his last in GB. I think there are some potentially very good replacements who will get playing time this year to show their stuff, and if Lacy and Franklin turn out to be as good as expected, there will be even less dependence on the TE to catch passes as part of the offense in any case.

Originally Posted by: OlHoss1884 



I agree completely with this, and also to some extent, with Z2C's followup comment. He SHOULD have a great contract year, but history says maybe not.

We got him as a bargain (what was it, 3rd or 4th round pick?); He wasn't as great as expected, but he was damn good for the round where we got him; We probably will lose him for nothing more than a compensatory pick; And somehow, I can't get too excited about that. I think the phasing in of others - Quarles, maybe Stoneburner and/or Bostick will ultimately result in a stronger situation in 2014.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
nerdmann
11 years ago
Dude's still only what, 25?

He's got one more shot to be the man. If he shuts his pie hole and lights it up, Ted will pay him the money.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
OlHoss1884
11 years ago

I agree completely with this, and also to some extent, with Z2C's followup comment. He SHOULD have a great contract year, but history says maybe not.

We got him as a bargain (what was it, 3rd or 4th round pick?); He wasn't as great as expected, but he was damn good for the round where we got him; We probably will lose him for nothing more than a compensatory pick; And somehow, I can't get too excited about that. I think the phasing in of others - Quarles, maybe Stoneburner and/or Bostick will ultimately result in a stronger situation in 2014.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Agreed. And since I think they want to run the ball more effectively, I am thinking a guy who can block some will hold more value in the long run. Even if Finley has a monster year, so what? Pay him $6 million a year for 4 or 5 years? No way! But someone will and best of luck to them.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" --Albert Einstein
nerdmann
11 years ago

Agreed. And since I think they want to run the ball more effectively, I am thinking a guy who can block some will hold more value in the long run. Even if Finley has a monster year, so what? Pay him $6 million a year for 4 or 5 years? No way! But someone will and best of luck to them.

Originally Posted by: OlHoss1884 



If dude displays value, Ted will pay him.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

If dude displays value, Ted will pay him.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



You're probably both right. If Finley gets his shit together for a year, SOMEBODY will pay him the big bucks, and unless somebody else goes totally crazy, that somebody will probably be TT. Then, after he gets his big contract with a lot of guaranteed money, Finley will go back to "not being able to focus", and good luck to whoever signs him - us.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (21h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (21h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.