beast
11 years ago

By taking them out, you take out the ones the Receiver is responsible for.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



No it doesn't the drops are still there.

It doesn't really matter though. If a receiver reduces the number of missed targets because he is better, he should get credit for it.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



Targets are more on the QB than the R (receiver) and you keep only taking about the reduce... they can also add to them. Which there for those come closer to cancelling each other out and it's even more so on the QB and even less so on the R.


UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
11 years ago

No it doesn't the drops are still there.



Targets are more on the QB than the R (receiver) and you keep only taking about the reduce... they can also add to them. Which there for those come closer to cancelling each other out and it's even more so on the QB and even less so on the R.

Originally Posted by: beast 



The drops are there, but the fighting for a ball that would be deflected or picked off by the DB are not. The times he uses his body to shield the defender. The times he gets open with a great cut or outrunning the coverage. None of those are there either.

Just like YAC for a QB. It isn't all to the credit of the QB, but some is. They don't take YAC out of the passer rating. Because the better QBs will have more.

If a R is great at getting separation, he will have fewer passes deflected. He will have fewer passes thrown away. His completions per target will go up the better he is.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
nerdmann
11 years ago
i still think there's something about the way Aaron throws the ball.

If it was just one guy dropping passes, that'd be one thing.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
11 years ago

If a R is great at getting separation, he will have fewer passes deflected. He will have fewer passes thrown away. His completions per target will go up the better he is.

Originally Posted by: Dexter_Sinister 



If you assume, the QB only throws to a guy when he's open. Then yes... but often times when the QB is pressure they still try to get the ball off and at times isn't near the R.

So you're correct R can effect the target... but the QB effect it so much more. And we don't know if they even had a chance at catching the ball. And lots of teams play in zones, so the guy could beat his coverage but the QB doesn't see a double team and the ball doesn't get to the R and it's the fault of the QB.

The targets add a lot more that on the QB than the R. Can the R effect it? Yes... but they're more the dependent variable on that stat with independent variable... if the R is more so the dependent variable it shouldn't count against them.

UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
11 years ago

If you assume, the QB only throws to a guy when he's open. Then yes... but often times when the QB is pressure they still try to get the ball off and at times isn't near the R.

So you're correct R can effect the target... but the QB effect it so much more. And we don't know if they even had a chance at catching the ball. And lots of teams play in zones, so the guy could beat his coverage but the QB doesn't see a double team and the ball doesn't get to the R and it's the fault of the QB.

The targets add a lot more that on the QB than the R. Can the R effect it? Yes... but they're more the dependent variable on that stat with independent variable... if the R is more so the dependent variable it shouldn't count against them.

Originally Posted by: beast 



No I am not assuming that.

But just like YAC for a QB, it doesn't all have to be because of him for him to have a positive impact on YAC. A QB doesn't actually get YAC. He is completely dependent on the WR. But a better QB will have more. So it counts..

Will a better receiver be open more than a bad one?

Will a better receiver have fewer passes defensed?

Will a better receiver fight for a ball?

Will a better receiver go up and get the ball at it's highest point?

Will a better receiver shield the defender?

Will a better receiver get more separation?

If YAC counts for a QB, Targets count for a WR.

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (12h) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (13h) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (15h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (15h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (15h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (15h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (15h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (16h) : I think this games over
beast (16h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (17h) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (20h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (20h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (20h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.