wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago
a kitchen site for the UK no less. makes no sense.
UserPostedImage
Laser Gunns
11 years ago
Woah,

Didn't realize it was that bad.

I was just wondering if was a robot program or a couple of douches.

MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
Zero2Cool
11 years ago
Here is one suggestion ...


1. Creat a Role named "Unapproved", set it as "Is Start"
2. Set "Read Only Access" or "No Access" on all forum
3. Once admin approved, then you set them to "Registered User" Role (offical member) and they can post things.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago
I seem to recall years ago I registered at some website and they wouldn't let me you my hotmail account. They didn't allow any of those types be it gmail (which wasn't around back then.) yahoo or the like. I had to use the one that was assigned to my internet provider. I wonder if that would slow things down some. Of course technology has changed so much. We probably only had a couple of accounts available to use. Now providers allow you to create a whole lot more.

btw I checked with another board that I go to. I never see spam posts there so I asked him what he did. The only thing he did that I have not seen mentioned here was that he wanted the new members to have a US email address. I find it strange since he was regular posters who are overseas. I told him we have too many members that live overseas who are valued members of the board and we wouldn't want to keep others like them from joining.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago
Thank you for the leg work.

yopmail was the tell tale for the spammers, but now they are using @domain.com of their choice. I could create wpr@packershome.com if I wanted and if banned, create wpr1@packerhsome.com, etc... or wpr@noequalsol.com ... domain's are easy to come by, especially with the free email services.

I know a few tricks to find out if they are spam accounts. I just have to catch them in the middle of creating/posting, which I have quite a few times. Which lemme tell you, when I slap them out before they get to post ... BOOM I do a little fist pump and flip the finger at them with a big smile.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

Thank you for the leg work.

yopmail was the tell tale for the spammers, but now they are using @domain.com of their choice. I could create wpr@packershome.com if I wanted and if banned, create wpr1@packerhsome.com, etc... or wpr@noequalsol.com ... domain's are easy to come by, especially with the free email services.

I know a few tricks to find out if they are spam accounts. I just have to catch them in the middle of creating/posting, which I have quite a few times. Which lemme tell you, when I slap them out before they get to post ... BOOM I do a little fist pump and flip the finger at them with a big smile.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



=d> =d> =d>

Kevin:
[boxing] [boxing] [boxing] [boxing] [boxing] [boxing] [boxing] [boxing] [boxing] [boxing]

then they say:
[wasntme] [wasntme] [wasntme] [wasntme] [wasntme]

Yeah having your own domain 10 years ago was almost unheard of unless you were a pretty good sized company. All the more reason to hate godaddy.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago
lol I had my own domain 10 years ago ... for a Tribes 2 Renegades clan called Death 2 All. It was d2aclan.com but I think someone has since bought it.

]d2a[ SlickVision

for the win!
UserPostedImage
Porforis
11 years ago

Thank you for the leg work.

yopmail was the tell tale for the spammers, but now they are using @domain.com of their choice. I could create wpr@packershome.com if I wanted and if banned, create wpr1@packerhsome.com, etc... or wpr@noequalsol.com ... domain's are easy to come by, especially with the free email services.

I know a few tricks to find out if they are spam accounts. I just have to catch them in the middle of creating/posting, which I have quite a few times. Which lemme tell you, when I slap them out before they get to post ... BOOM I do a little fist pump and flip the finger at them with a big smile.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Or just redirect them to lemonparty instead.
Pack93z
11 years ago

Here is one suggestion ...


1. Creat a Role named "Unapproved", set it as "Is Start"
2. Set "Read Only Access" or "No Access" on all forum
3. Once admin approved, then you set them to "Registered User" Role (offical member) and they can post things.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Here is the thing with these approaches.. at least from my viewpoint and experience. The casual user passing by the becomes interested in a topic and wishes to respond, now will not have the ability to, which might prevent them from interacting and possibly becoming more involved.

Basically, will it have an impact on the growth of the website that you have been seeking?

I think it is more notable here because everything falls on one.. not a few that can spread over the load of nipping the spam accounts in the bud.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

Here is the thing with these approaches.. at least from my viewpoint and experience. The casual user passing by the becomes interested in a topic and wishes to respond, now will not have the ability to, which might prevent them from interacting and possibly becoming more involved.

Basically, will it have an impact on the growth of the website that you have been seeking?

I think it is more notable here because everything falls on one.. not a few that can spread over the load of nipping the spam accounts in the bud.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Probably, but what negative impact to the growth desired is spam having? How many people want to come to a site littered with crap about kitchens in the UK when they are expecting to talk about the Packers? I'd think that would turn quite a few away too. I could be over analyzing things too though. I dunno.

Maybe adding a person or two to help clean up the spam would be best. I dunno. I just don't like sharing "my" problems. I should be smart enough to figure something out to stop this crap. Ugh!!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4h) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (4h) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (5h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (5h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (5h) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (5h) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (5h) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (17h) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (17h) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (17h) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (18h) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (18h) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (18h) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (18h) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (19h) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (19h) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (19h) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (20h) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (20h) : Chiefs got shutout
Zero2Cool (20h) : Rodgers passes for 3rd TD. might be last game of an amazing career
Mucky Tundra (21h) : "The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry."
Zero2Cool (22h) : Owner ... love it
Zero2Cool (22h) : Mayo was the guy they groomed for HC and one of the reasons they let Bill go.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Pats have the #4 pick, lots of cap space and Maye at QB; should fetch some attention
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Well that didn't take long; Jerod Mayo out as Patriots HC
Zero2Cool (22h) : I would expect it to be higher in favor of Eagles
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Thst line seems...generous
Zero2Cool (23h) : Eagles -3.5 over Packers in Wildcard Round
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Did it though? Pokes beat the Commanders on the road with Cooper Rush previously
Zero2Cool (5-Jan) : That gives them their best chance
Mucky Tundra (5-Jan) : Cowboys starting Trey Lance at QB vs Commanders; GB vs Philly in the Wild Card incoming!
Mucky Tundra (4-Jan) : Stinks for Lloyd. Hoping he comes back strong for next year
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Packers placed Marshawn Lloyd on reserve non-football illness list
Zero2Cool (3-Jan) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

33m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

3-Jan / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.