I seen this the other day... without knowing all the case history, it seems weak on the surface in the court of law.
Basic premise, it is illegal to discriminate on ethic background or sexual orientation, but Iowa now is splitting the hairs based on looks?
I read about he "low cut" top and other accusations, but after her long tenure of employment it seems that behavior would have been more prevalent earlier than now.
Me thinks it was the wife's insecurities that prompted the termination.. unjustly in my opinion. And the fine state of corn upheld it.
What next.. incorrect eye color? Shade of hair?
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"