I got you down as a vote favoring the 5 round magazine limit, comrade. lol

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 

Unfortunately, I fear that compared to your enlightened ass, 95% of America would qualify as rednecks. I'm dammned glad I don't have a gun!

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

Continuing to put words in my mouth is only making you a jackass, buckwheat.

You want me to answer the questions he poses and I'm saying the questions arise from the multitude of inaccurate reports, because those reporting care not about accuracy but about being first on the 'breaking news'. Essentially, right back to my point of the author using the piss poor journalism in this country and leveraging brilliant wording to brainwash people thinking the many errant reports were FACTUAL reports, instead of being inaccurate shoot from the hip reports to get their article published first.

I really don't know how to make this more simple for you.

Shooting happens in school.
Reporters throw out anything they 'hear', claiming its from witnesses before verifying the information.
New reports come out after more information obtained.
Official report after confirmation of events while cross checking facts, etc...
Fella on the internet uses the multitude of flippant reports as facts that were retracted by Government and brainwashes weak minded folks who don't understand how to businesses try to monetize the internet.
Most people hate the Government, or at least dislike it strongly and don't trust it (no fault there) and that makes the aforementioned article more believable.


Does that make more sense? I ask because I care. I truly do not want people falling for this guy's manipulation. It really saddens me that people buy into that stuff. And I do not mean that in any negative connotation at all.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Should I put you down as favoring the 5 cartridge magazine max or against? Personally, I'm totally ready to give up the high-capacity magazines if only it would shut Dakota T's liberal-assed-big-yap for just five fucking minutes. Alternatively, should we discuss Plato's 36?

Sorry, Wade, lol - I can't help myself- good stuff...

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 

Well, with my bad vision, *I* shouldn't be allowed anything more than a zero cartridge magazine. :)

But I favor no restrictions on gun ownership (other than the obvious ones re: felons, certified psychopaths, etc.

So, put me down as "anti."

:)

By the way, Sage Steele, like any babe, looks far better in stiletto heels than in knee high boots.

Whoever invented knee high boots for attractive women should be required to be locked in a room with a bunch of people armed with mega-magazined automatic weapons.

And I'd definitely vote for a ban on attractive women wearing knee high boots for anything other than being outside in northern winters. *That* would be a law worth passing.

:)

Originally Posted by: Wade 

I had a humor-thing going, there.


The libs can whine and parade, the Euro-soccer suckers can condescend, the Dems can milk the issue, but let's not get confused...

Not one single gun will get confiscated by the government from an otherwise law-abiding citizen.

Not safely for our society, anyway.

Gun owners are not New Yorkers or Nancy Pelosi Feinstein/ Boxer voters. I would like to witness the attempt to take the guns from self-perceived-law-abiding citizens, that would certainly be fun to watch.

"dfosterf" wrote:

Not a single word was put in your mouth.

I know where the questions arise from. My point is: Not a single news source back tracked and claimed previous reports were false, misled, misunderstanding, etc. They just simply reported new information. Sure, the likely story is probably the one most recently 'reported', but why are all the past reports plain ignored instead of addressed?

It saddens you? Really? He compiles all the information that was given and once reported as FACT (which is funny, because facts NEVER change) and draws the conclusion that we REALLY don't know what happened there. Your definition of manipulation is shaky at best.

Originally Posted by: Formo 

Zombieslayer: you would have loved Sage's footwear this morning -- boots WITH stiletto heels. :)

Had this glittery club blouse number on, too. But I digress from my main question...

Er, Zero, whatcha picking fights with Formo now for? Feel sorry for him for being a Viking fan, that I understand. Or are you just bored?

He after all has been making a bit more sense than most of the people in this thread*, after all.

:)

Heck, even Foster seems desirous of appeasing liberals on this one. Though that's sort of like feeling sorry for VIking fans, come to think of it.

Originally Posted by: Wade